• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切换成本对选择惰性及其后果的影响。

The effect of switching costs on choice-inertia and its consequences.

机构信息

Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 25;14(3):e0214098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214098. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0214098
PMID:30908520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6433253/
Abstract

In two studies we provide a novel investigation into the effects of monetary switching costs on choice-inertia (i.e., selection of the same option on consecutive choices). Study 1 employed a static decisions-from-feedback task and found that the introduction of, as well as larger, monetary switching costs led to increases in choice-inertia. While experience and decreases in the similarity of options average payouts (expected value: EV) increased choice-inertia for the option with a higher EV (the EV maximizing option), switching costs increased choice-inertia for the inferior option (the lower EV option): The proportion of total participants showing choice-inertia for the EV maximizing option also increased with switching costs. Study 2 employed a dynamic decisions-from-feedback task where halfway through the task the EV maximizing option became the inferior option. The effect of switching costs increasing choice-inertia for both the EV maximizing and the inferior option was replicated with little impact of the change in options values being detected. In sum, decision makers appear to be sensitive to switching costs, and this sensitivity can bias them towards inferior or superior options, revealing the good and the bad of choice-inertia.

摘要

在两项研究中,我们对货币转换成本对选择惯性(即在连续选择中选择相同选项)的影响进行了新的研究。研究 1 采用了静态决策反馈任务,发现引入和增加货币转换成本会导致选择惯性增加。而经验和选项平均支付(预期价值:EV)的相似性降低会增加高 EV 选项(最大化 EV 选项)的选择惯性,而转换成本则会增加低 EV 选项(低 EV 选项)的选择惯性:表现出对最大化 EV 选项的选择惯性的总参与者比例也随着转换成本的增加而增加。研究 2 采用了动态决策反馈任务,在任务进行到一半时,最大化 EV 的选项变成了低 EV 的选项。转换成本增加了对最大化 EV 选项和低 EV 选项的选择惯性的影响,而选项价值的变化几乎没有影响。总之,决策者似乎对货币转换成本很敏感,这种敏感性会使他们偏向于低 EV 或高 EV 的选项,从而揭示了选择惯性的优缺点。

相似文献

1
The effect of switching costs on choice-inertia and its consequences.切换成本对选择惰性及其后果的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 25;14(3):e0214098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214098. eCollection 2019.
2
Patient inertia and the status quo bias: when an inferior option is preferred.患者惰性和现状偏见:当较差的选择更受青睐时。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1763-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797613479976. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
3
Autonomous mechanism of internal choice estimate underlies decision inertia.自主的内部选择估计机制是决策惯性的基础。
Neuron. 2014 Jan 8;81(1):195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
4
The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.吸引力效应调节奖励预测误差和跨期选择。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371-382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016.
5
Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N - 2 repetition costs in task switching?任务切换中的动作控制:动作效应是否会调节任务切换中的N-2重复成本?
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):146-156. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0946-7. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
6
Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.适应性历史偏差源于过去选择的置信度加权积累。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2418-2429. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2189-17.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
7
Similarity and decision time in preferential choice.偏好选择中的相似性与决策时间。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun;71(6):1276-1280. doi: 10.1177/1747021818763054. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
8
Choice adaptation to changing environments: trends, feedback, and observability of change.选择适应不断变化的环境:变化的趋势、反馈和可观察性。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1486-1512. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01313-2. Epub 2022 May 23.
9
The impact of choice discriminability and outcome valence on visual decision making under risk.选择可辨别性和结果效价对风险下视觉决策的影响。
Vision Res. 2022 Oct;199:108073. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108073. Epub 2022 May 25.
10
Risk Preferences in Surrogate Decision Making.代理决策中的风险偏好。
Exp Psychol. 2017 Jul;64(4):290-297. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000371.

引用本文的文献

1
Risky hybrid foraging: The impact of risk, reward value, and prevalence on foraging behavior in hybrid visual search.有风险的混合觅食:风险、奖励价值和发生率对混合视觉搜索中觅食行为的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1037/xge0001652.
2
Don't Give-Up: Why some intervention schemes encourage suboptimal behavior.不要放弃:为何一些干预方案会助长次优行为。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):363-372. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02537-w. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
The reference dependence roots of inaction inertia: A query theory account.不作为惯性的参照依赖根源:查询理论解释。

本文引用的文献

1
The Interpersonal Sunk-Cost Effect.人际沉没成本效应。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;29(7):1072-1083. doi: 10.1177/0956797617752641. Epub 2018 May 11.
2
Choice in experiential learning: True preferences or experimental artifacts?体验式学习中的选择:真实偏好还是实验产物?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Mar;174:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
3
Reliance on small samples, the wavy recency effect, and similarity-based learning.对小样本的依赖、波浪式近因效应和基于相似性的学习。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 31;18(3):e0282876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282876. eCollection 2023.
4
On the Effect of Practice on Exploration and Exploitation of Options and Strategies.实践对选项与策略探索及利用的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 12;12:725690. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725690. eCollection 2021.
Psychol Rev. 2015 Oct;122(4):621-47. doi: 10.1037/a0039413. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
4
Absolutely relative or relatively absolute: violations of value invariance in human decision making.绝对相对还是相对绝对:人类决策中价值不变性的违背
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):22-38. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0858-8.
5
Switching benefits and costs in competitive health insurance markets: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence from the Netherlands.竞争型健康保险市场中的收益与成本转换:来自荷兰的概念框架与实证证据
Health Policy. 2015 May;119(5):664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
6
Learned helplessness and learned prevalence: exploring the causal relations among perceived controllability, reward prevalence, and exploration.习得性无助与习得性偏好:探索感知可控性、奖励普遍性和探索行为之间的因果关系。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Oct;25(10):1861-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797614543022. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
7
When natural selection should optimize speed-accuracy trade-offs.自然选择何时应优化速度与准确性的权衡。
Front Neurosci. 2014 Apr 10;8:73. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00073. eCollection 2014.
8
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
9
Patient inertia and the status quo bias: when an inferior option is preferred.患者惰性和现状偏见:当较差的选择更受青睐时。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1763-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797613479976. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
10
On surprise, change, and the effect of recent outcomes.论意外、变化及近期结果的影响。
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 21;3:24. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00024. eCollection 2012.