Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory, Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Air Force Research Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1486-1512. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01313-2. Epub 2022 May 23.
Making successful decisions in dynamic environments requires that we adapt our actions to the changing environmental conditions. Past research has found that people are slow to adapt their choices when faced with change, they tend to be over-reliant on initial experiences, and they are susceptible to factors such as feedback and the direction of change (trend). We build on these findings using two experiments that manipulate feedback and trend in a binary choice task, where decisions are made from experience. Feedback was either partial (providing only the outcome of the selected choice) or full (providing outcomes of the selected and the forgone choice) and the expected value of one option either increased, decreased, or remained constant. Crucially, although the two choice options had equal expected value averaged across all trials, their expected values on individual trials differed, and halfway through 100 choice trials the choice option with higher expected value switched, requiring participants to adapt their choices in order to maximize their outcomes. In Experiment 1, the probability of receiving the high-value outcome changed over time. In Experiment 2, the outcome value changed over time. Generally, we found that participants had trouble adapting to change: full feedback led to more maximization than partial feedback before the switch but did not make a difference after the switch, suggesting stickiness and poor adaptation. Slightly better adaptation was found for changing outcome values over changing probabilities, implying that the observability of the element of change influences adaptation.
在动态环境中做出成功的决策需要我们根据不断变化的环境条件调整我们的行动。过去的研究发现,当面临变化时,人们调整选择的速度较慢,他们往往过于依赖最初的经验,并且容易受到反馈和变化方向(趋势)等因素的影响。我们通过两个实验在二进制选择任务中操纵反馈和趋势,在这个任务中,决策是基于经验做出的。反馈要么是部分的(只提供所选选择的结果),要么是完全的(提供所选和放弃选择的结果),并且一个选项的预期值要么增加,要么减少,要么保持不变。至关重要的是,尽管两个选择选项在所有试验中平均具有相等的预期值,但它们在单个试验中的预期值不同,在 100 次选择试验的中途,具有更高预期值的选择选项发生了切换,要求参与者调整他们的选择以最大限度地提高他们的结果。在实验 1 中,高价值结果的出现概率随时间变化。在实验 2 中,结果值随时间变化。总的来说,我们发现参与者难以适应变化:在切换之前,完全反馈比部分反馈导致更多的最大化,但在切换之后没有区别,这表明存在粘性和适应性差。对于随概率变化的结果值的稍微更好的适应性表明,变化元素的可观察性影响适应性。