• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在保肢治疗前后,糖尿病足溃疡愈合与不愈合患者的微生物组存在差异。

Evidence of differential microbiomes in healing versus non-healing diabetic foot ulcers prior to and following foot salvage therapy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2019 Jul;37(7):1596-1603. doi: 10.1002/jor.24279. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1002/jor.24279
PMID:30908702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6659747/
Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) contribute to 80% of lower extremity amputations. Although physicians currently rely on clinical signs along with non-specific biomarkers of infection, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, to diagnose and monitor DFU, there is no specific and sensitive measure available to monitor or prognosticate the success of foot salvage therapy (FST). To address this we performed a prospective, observational microbiome analysis to test the hypotheses that: (i) the initial microbiomes of healed versus non-healed DFU are distinct; (ii) the microbial load, diversity and presence of pathogenic organism of the DFU change in response to antibiotics treatment; and (iii) the changes in the DFU microbiome during treatment are prognostic of clinical outcome. To test this, microbiome analyses were performed on 23 DFU patients undergoing FST, in which wound samples were collected at zero, four, and eight weeks following wound debridement and antibiotics treatment. Bacterial abundance was determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Eleven patients healed their DFU, while FDT failed to heal DFU in the other 12 patients. Microbiome results demonstrated that healing DFUs had a larger abundance Actinomycetales and Staphylococcaceae (p < 0.05), while DFUs that did not heal had a higher abundance of Bacteroidales and Streptococcaceae (p < 0.05). FST marked increases Actinomycetales in DFU, and this increase is significantly greater in patients that healed (p < 0.05). Future studies to confirm the differential microbiomes, and that increasing Actinomycetales is prognostic of successful FST are warranted. Statement of Clinical Significance: Tracking changes in the prevalence of pathogens in diabetic foot ulcers may be a clinical tool for monitoring treatment response to foot salvage therapy and prognosticating the need for further surgical intervention. The initial wound sample microbiome may provide important prognostic information on the eventual clinical outcome of foot salvage therapy. It may serve as an important clinical tool for patient counseling and making surgical decision of pursuing foot salvage versus amputation. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1596-1603, 2019.

摘要

糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)占下肢截肢的 80%。尽管医生目前依赖临床症状以及感染的非特异性生物标志物,如红细胞沉降率和 C 反应蛋白,来诊断和监测 DFU,但目前尚无可用的特定和敏感措施来监测或预测足部保存治疗(FST)的成功。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项前瞻性、观察性的微生物组分析,以检验以下假设:(i)愈合的 DFU 与未愈合的 DFU 的初始微生物组是不同的;(ii)DFU 的微生物负荷、多样性和致病生物体的存在因抗生素治疗而改变;(iii)治疗过程中 DFU 微生物组的变化是临床结果的预测因素。为了验证这一点,对 23 例接受 FST 的 DFU 患者进行了微生物组分析,其中在清创和抗生素治疗后 0、4 和 8 周采集伤口样本。使用定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)测定细菌丰度。11 例患者的 DFU 愈合,而其余 12 例患者的 FDT 未能治愈 DFU。微生物组结果表明,愈合的 DFU 中有大量放线菌目和葡萄球菌科(p<0.05),而未愈合的 DFU 中则有大量拟杆菌目和链球菌科(p<0.05)。FST 使 DFU 中的放线菌目显著增加,而在愈合的患者中增加更为显著(p<0.05)。需要进一步的研究来确认差异微生物组,以及放线菌目的增加是 FST 成功的预测指标。临床意义声明:跟踪糖尿病足溃疡中病原体流行率的变化可能是监测足部保存治疗反应并预测是否需要进一步手术干预的临床工具。初始伤口样本微生物组可能为足部保存治疗的最终临床结果提供重要的预后信息。它可以作为患者咨询和决定进行足部保存治疗还是截肢的重要临床工具。2019 年骨科研究协会。由 Wiley Periodicals,Inc. 出版。J Orthop Res 37:1596-1603,2019.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2693/6659747/128f1ec49fea/nihms-1039761-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2693/6659747/6bdbffe37dd1/nihms-1039761-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2693/6659747/5032948c8a6b/nihms-1039761-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2693/6659747/128f1ec49fea/nihms-1039761-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2693/6659747/6bdbffe37dd1/nihms-1039761-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2693/6659747/5032948c8a6b/nihms-1039761-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2693/6659747/128f1ec49fea/nihms-1039761-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence of differential microbiomes in healing versus non-healing diabetic foot ulcers prior to and following foot salvage therapy.在保肢治疗前后,糖尿病足溃疡愈合与不愈合患者的微生物组存在差异。
J Orthop Res. 2019 Jul;37(7):1596-1603. doi: 10.1002/jor.24279. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
2
Association between baseline abundance of Peptoniphilus, a Gram-positive anaerobic coccus, and wound healing outcomes of DFUs.Peptoniphilus(一种革兰阳性厌氧球菌)基线丰度与 DFUs 愈合结局的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0227006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227006. eCollection 2020.
3
Poorly designed research does not help clarify the role of hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers.设计不佳的研究无助于阐明高压氧在慢性糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的作用。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2016 Sep;46(3):133-134.
4
Emerging Diabetic Foot Ulcer Microbiome Analysis Using Cutting Edge Technologies.利用前沿技术分析新兴糖尿病足溃疡的微生物组。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;16(2):353-363. doi: 10.1177/1932296821990097. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
Prospective randomised placebo-controlled trial assessing the efficacy of silver dressings to enhance healing of acute diabetes-related foot ulcers.一项前瞻性随机安慰剂对照试验,评估银敷料促进急性糖尿病相关足部溃疡愈合的疗效。
Diabetologia. 2023 Apr;66(4):768-776. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05855-7. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
6
A series of systematic reviews to inform a decision analysis for sampling and treating infected diabetic foot ulcers.一系列系统评价,为感染性糖尿病足溃疡的采样和治疗决策分析提供依据。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Apr;10(12):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-221. doi: 10.3310/hta10120.
7
Incidence and risk factors for developing infection in patients presenting with uninfected diabetic foot ulcers.未感染的糖尿病足溃疡患者发生感染的发生率及危险因素。
PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0177916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177916. eCollection 2017.
8
Examining diabetic heel ulcers through an ecological lens: microbial community dynamics associated with healing and infection.从生态角度审视糖尿病足跟溃疡:与愈合和感染相关的微生物群落动态。
J Med Microbiol. 2019 Feb;68(2):230-240. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000907. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
9
Topical application of the bee hive protectant propolis is well tolerated and improves human diabetic foot ulcer healing in a prospective feasibility study.在一项前瞻性可行性研究中,局部应用蜂巢保护剂蜂胶耐受性良好,并能促进人类糖尿病足溃疡的愈合。
J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):850-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
10
Metagenomics of diabetic foot ulcer undergoing treatment with total contact casting: a case study.采用全接触石膏治疗的糖尿病足溃疡的宏基因组学:一项病例研究。
J Wound Care. 2022 Sep 1;31(Sup9):S45-S49. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup9.S45.

引用本文的文献

1
Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 3 - A scoping review of chemical biomarkers.伤口管理、愈合及早期假肢康复:第3部分——化学生物标志物的范围综述
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2025 Feb 21;8(1):43717. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.43717. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring the Microbiome of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Focus on Cases with a Clinical Worse Outcome.探索糖尿病足溃疡的微生物群:聚焦临床结局较差的病例
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jul 18;14(7):724. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14070724.
3
Skin microbiota and diabetic foot ulcers.

本文引用的文献

1
2018 international consensus meeting on musculoskeletal infection: Summary from the biofilm workgroup and consensus on biofilm related musculoskeletal infections.2018 年肌肉骨骼感染国际共识会议:生物膜工作组总结及生物膜相关肌肉骨骼感染共识
J Orthop Res. 2019 May;37(5):1007-1017. doi: 10.1002/jor.24229. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
2
Tracking Anti- Antibodies Produced and during Foot Salvage Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infections Reveals Prognostic Insights and Evidence of Diversified Humoral Immunity.跟踪糖尿病足感染保肢治疗过程中产生的抗抗体可揭示预后信息和多样化体液免疫的证据。
Infect Immun. 2018 Nov 20;86(12). doi: 10.1128/IAI.00629-18. Print 2018 Dec.
3
皮肤微生物群与糖尿病足溃疡
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jul 1;16:1575081. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1575081. eCollection 2025.
4
Microbial Influences on Calcium-Phosphorus Homeostasis and Metabolic Bone Diseases: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomisation Study on the Gut-Bone Axis.微生物对钙磷稳态及代谢性骨病的影响:肠道-骨骼轴的双向孟德尔随机化研究
J Cell Mol Med. 2025 Apr;29(7):e70491. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70491.
5
Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 1 - A scoping review of healing and non-healing definitions.伤口管理、愈合及早期假肢康复:第1部分——愈合与不愈合定义的范围综述
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2024 Nov 15;7(2):43715. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43715. eCollection 2024.
6
Community assembly of the human piercing microbiome.人体穿孔微生物组的群落组装。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Nov 29;290(2011):20231174. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1174.
7
Understanding the impact of spinal cord injury on the microbiota of healthy skin and pressure injuries.了解脊髓损伤对健康皮肤和压疮微生物群的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 2;13(1):12540. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39519-2.
8
Multi-Instrumental Analysis Toward Exploring the Diabetic Foot Infection Microbiota.多仪器分析探索糖尿病足感染微生物组。
Curr Microbiol. 2023 Jul 5;80(8):271. doi: 10.1007/s00284-023-03384-z.
9
Prognostic factors for delayed healing of complex wounds in adults: A scoping review.成人复杂性创伤愈合延迟的预后因素:范围综述。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep;20(7):2869-2886. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14128. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
10
The Skin Microbiome: Current Landscape and Future Opportunities.皮肤微生物组:现状与未来机遇。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 16;24(4):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043950.
Factors determining the risk of diabetes foot amputations--A retrospective analysis of a tertiary diabetes foot care service.
决定糖尿病足截肢风险的因素——一项三级糖尿病足护理服务的回顾性分析
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;114:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Burden of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers on Hospital Admissions and Costs.感染性糖尿病足溃疡对住院及费用的负担
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 May;33:149-58. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.11.025. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
5
The effect of antibiotics on the microbiome in acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Oct;5(10):884-93. doi: 10.1002/alr.21591. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
6
The major predictors of amputation and length of stay in diabetic patients with acute foot ulceration.急性足部溃疡糖尿病患者截肢及住院时间的主要预测因素。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015 Jan;127(1-2):45-50. doi: 10.1007/s00508-014-0630-5. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
7
An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform.Illumina MiSeq 平台上用于多重 16S rRNA 基因测序的改良双索引方法。
Microbiome. 2014 Feb 24;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-6.
8
Diabetic foot ulcer microbiome: one small step for molecular microbiology . . . One giant leap for understanding diabetic foot ulcers?糖尿病足溃疡微生物群:分子微生物学的一小步……对理解糖尿病足溃疡而言却是一大步?
Diabetes. 2013 Mar;62(3):679-81. doi: 10.2337/db12-1325.
9
The neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer microbiome is associated with clinical factors.糖尿病神经病变性足溃疡的微生物组与临床因素有关。
Diabetes. 2013 Mar;62(3):923-30. doi: 10.2337/db12-0771. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
10
2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections.2012 年美国传染病学会临床实践指南:糖尿病足感染的诊断与治疗。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(12):e132-73. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis346.