Pel Johan J M, Boer Aleid C, van der Steen Johannes
Vestibular and Ocular Motor Research Group, Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Vis. 2019 Mar 1;19(3):9. doi: 10.1167/19.3.9.
In this study, a perceptual visual crowding paradigm was designed to quantitatively assess the detection speed of (un)crowded meaningful visual targets using eye-movement responses. This paradigm was tested in individuals with dyslexia and age-matched controls. Trials were shown on a monitor with an integrated eye tracker to 25 control and 11 dyslexic subjects without any known ocular problems. Each trial started with fixation of a central target. Next, four peripheral targets were shown (left, right, top, bottom), one being a duplicate of the central target. The duplicate was either surrounded by flankers (crowding trials) or shown in isolation (reference trials). The timing of the primary saccades were obtained as a measure for detection speed. The performance of the reference trials was significantly higher compared to the crowding trials (p < 0.05) and a 54% increase in saccadic reaction time (SRT) was found for the crowding trials. The linear mixed model revealed a significant effect of critical spacing and chart type. For the reference trials, no significant differences in SRT were found between dyslexic and control subjects. However, for the crowding trials, a significant increase of ∼13% in SRT was found in the dyslexic subjects. A first application of this paradigm showed that dyslexic subjects perform equally well in identifying visual targets in crowded as well as uncrowded scenes compared to controls. However, they seem to need more time to identify targets in crowded scenes, which might be related to the reading difficulties that they experience in general.
在本研究中,设计了一种感知视觉拥挤范式,以使用眼动反应定量评估(未)拥挤的有意义视觉目标的检测速度。该范式在诵读困难个体和年龄匹配的对照组中进行了测试。试验通过带有集成眼动追踪器的显示器向25名对照受试者和11名无任何已知眼部问题的诵读困难受试者展示。每个试验开始时先注视一个中央目标。接下来,显示四个周边目标(左、右、上、下),其中一个是中央目标的复制品。该复制品要么被侧翼干扰物包围(拥挤试验),要么单独显示(对照试验)。获取初次扫视的时间作为检测速度的指标。对照试验的表现显著高于拥挤试验(p < 0.05),并且发现拥挤试验的扫视反应时间(SRT)增加了54%。线性混合模型显示临界间距和图表类型有显著影响。对于对照试验,诵读困难受试者和对照受试者之间的SRT没有显著差异。然而,对于拥挤试验,诵读困难受试者的SRT显著增加了约13%。该范式的首次应用表明,与对照组相比,诵读困难受试者在识别拥挤和未拥挤场景中的视觉目标方面表现同样出色。然而,他们似乎需要更多时间来识别拥挤场景中的目标,这可能与他们通常遇到的阅读困难有关。