Biscaldi M, Gezeck S, Stuhr V
Brain Research Unit, Institute of Biophysics, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 1998 Nov;36(11):1189-202. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00170-x.
A large group of subjects, either average readers or reading/spelling disabled subjects (n = 185; age between 8-25 years; M = 13 +/- 4 years), were tested in various standardized cognitive tasks including reading/spelling assessment and in non-cognitive saccadic eye movement tasks. Dyslexics were separated into a subgroup (D1) with deficits in the serial auditory short-term memory and a subgroup (D2) with an isolated low achievement in reading/writing. Control subjects had no relevant cognitive deficit of any type. Saccadic eye movements were measured in a single target and in a sequential-target task. A significant correlation was found between abnormal saccadic control and reading disability. The two dyslexic groups showed only slight differences. As compared to the control group, the mean values of the standard deviations of the saccadic reaction times (SRT) and the amount of late saccades (SRT > 700) were significantly increased in both dyslexic groups and especially in group D1 who also showed an increased amount of anticipatory saccades. The number of express saccades (SRT = 80-134 ms) was increased, but not significantly, in D2 dyslexics. Both dyslexic groups produced significantly more regressive saccades in the sequential-target task. The correlation between saccadic variables and "reading factor" was 0.4. Significant deviations from normal performance of the saccadic variables were found in an estimated 50% of the dyslexics as compared to 20% of the control subjects. In spite of their worse level in saccadic control, dyslexics also developed with age in the eye movement performance as the control subjects did. Yet, the development was slower in group D1. It is suggested that reading process and saccade system are both controlled by visuo spatial attention and fixation systems that maybe impaired or develop slowly in many dyslexic subjects.
一大组受试者,包括普通阅读者或阅读/拼写障碍者(n = 185;年龄在8至25岁之间;平均年龄M = 13±4岁),接受了各种标准化认知任务测试,包括阅读/拼写评估以及非认知性扫视眼动任务。诵读困难者被分为一个在系列听觉短期记忆方面有缺陷的亚组(D1)和一个在阅读/写作方面仅有低成绩的亚组(D2)。对照组没有任何类型的相关认知缺陷。在单目标和序列目标任务中测量扫视眼动。发现异常扫视控制与阅读障碍之间存在显著相关性。两个诵读困难组仅显示出轻微差异。与对照组相比,两个诵读困难组的扫视反应时间(SRT)标准差和晚期扫视(SRT > 700)数量的平均值均显著增加,尤其是D1组,该组还表现出预期扫视数量增加。D2组诵读困难者的快速扫视(SRT = 80 - 134毫秒)数量增加,但不显著。两个诵读困难组在序列目标任务中产生的回退扫视都显著更多。扫视变量与“阅读因子”之间的相关性为0.4。与20%的对照组受试者相比,估计50%的诵读困难者的扫视变量表现出与正常表现的显著偏差。尽管诵读困难者的扫视控制水平较差,但他们的眼动表现也像对照组受试者一样随着年龄增长而发展。然而,D1组的发展较慢。有人提出,阅读过程和扫视系统都受视觉空间注意力和注视系统控制,而在许多诵读困难受试者中,这些系统可能受损或发展缓慢。