Kieser J A, Groeneveld H T
Anthropol Anz. 1986 Jun;44(2):175-82.
Problems of small sample size and incompleteness of fossil data in the evaluation of metric asymmetry may be overcome by the application of cluster sampling techniques together with factorial analyses of variance. Degrees of fluctuating odontometric asymmetry are reported in Australopithecus, Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis. In all three populations mesiodistal dimensions were shown to be more asymmetric than buccolingual dimensions, with maxillary teeth exhibiting significantly greater degrees of asymmetry than mandibular teeth. Neanderthal teeth were significantly more metrically asymmetric than those of either Australopithecus or H. erectus, with population differences in asymmetry centered in the maxillary teeth.
