Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Carolina Medical School, Columbia, South Carolina.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Phys Ther. 2019 Jul 1;99(7):946-952. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz050.
Patients with pelvic pain due to pelvic floor myofascial pain syndrome are often referred for pelvic floor physical therapy, the primary treatment option. However, many patients do not adhere to the treatment.
The purpose of this study was to examine the adherence rate and outcomes of patients referred for physical therapy for pelvic floor myofascial pain syndrome and identify risk factors associated with nonadherence.
This was a retrospective cohort study.
ICD-9 codes were used to identify a cohort of patients with pelvic floor myofascial pain syndrome during a 2-year time period within a single provider's clinical practice. Medical records were abstracted to obtain information on referral to physical therapy, associated comorbidities and demographics, and clinical outcomes. "Primary outcomes" was defined as attendance of at least 1 visit. Secondary outcomes included attendance of at least 6 physical therapist visits and overall improvement in pain. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square, Fisher exact, and independent t tests. Nonparametric comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Multivariate analysis was completed to adjust for confounders.
Of the 205 patients, 140 (68%) attended at least 1 session with physical therapy. At least 6 visits were attended by 68 (33%) patients. Factors associated with poor adherence included parity and a preexisting psychiatric diagnosis. The odds of attending at least 1 visit were 0.75 (95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.90) and 0.44 (95% confidence interval = 0.21-0.90), respectively. Patients who attended ≥ 6 visits were more likely to have private insurance (78%) and travel shorter distances to a therapist (mean = 16 miles vs 22). Patients with an improvement in pain (compared with those who were unchanged) attended an average of 3 extra physical therapist visits (mean = 6.9 vs 3.1).
Limitations include reliance on medical records for data integrity; a patient population derived from a single clinic, reducing the generalizability of the results; the age of the data (2010-2012); and the likely interrelatedness of many of the variables. It is possible that maternal parity and psychiatric diagnoses are partial surrogates for social, logistic, or economic constraints and patient confidence.
Initial adherence to pelvic floor physical therapy was less likely for multiparous women and women with a history of psychiatric diagnosis. Persistent adherence was more likely with private insurance or if the physical therapist location was closer. Pain improvement correlated with increased number of physical therapist sessions.
患有盆底肌筋膜疼痛综合征所致骨盆疼痛的患者常被转介至盆底物理治疗,这是主要的治疗选择。然而,许多患者不坚持治疗。
本研究旨在检查因盆底肌筋膜疼痛综合征而接受物理治疗的患者的依从率和治疗结果,并确定与不依从相关的风险因素。
这是一项回顾性队列研究。
使用 ICD-9 代码在单名提供者临床实践的 2 年时间内确定盆底肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者队列。从病历中提取信息,以获取有关转介至物理治疗、相关合并症和人口统计学以及临床结果的信息。“主要结果”定义为至少参加 1 次就诊。次要结果包括至少参加 6 次物理治疗就诊和疼痛总体改善。使用卡方检验、Fisher 确切检验和独立 t 检验进行统计分析。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行非参数比较。完成多变量分析以调整混杂因素。
在 205 名患者中,有 140 名(68%)至少参加了 1 次物理治疗。至少有 6 次就诊的患者有 68 名(33%)。与依从性差相关的因素包括多胎和先前存在的精神科诊断。至少就诊 1 次的可能性分别为 0.75(95%置信区间为 0.62-0.90)和 0.44(95%置信区间为 0.21-0.90)。参加≥6 次就诊的患者更有可能拥有私人保险(78%),并且前往治疗师的距离较短(平均 16 英里与 22 英里)。与疼痛改善的患者(与疼痛无变化的患者相比)相比,他们平均多参加 3 次物理治疗(平均 6.9 次与 3.1 次)。
局限性包括依赖病历来确保数据完整性;患者人群来源于单个诊所,降低了结果的普遍性;数据的时代(2010-2012 年);许多变量之间可能存在相互关系。产妇生育次数和精神科诊断可能是社会、后勤或经济限制以及患者信心的部分替代指标。
多胎妇女和有精神科诊断史的妇女初次接受盆底物理治疗的依从性较低。有私人保险或治疗师位置较近时,持续依从性更高。疼痛改善与物理治疗师就诊次数增加相关。