Zoorob Dani, South Mary, Karram Mickey, Sroga Julie, Maxwell Rose, Shah Aparna, Whiteside James
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine And Reconstructive Surgery, University Of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, MS 2028, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA,
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jun;26(6):845-52. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2606-4. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
Our aim was to determine the effects of pelvic floor physical therapy (PT) and levator-directed trigger-point injections (LTPI) on sexual function and levator-related pelvic pain.
A randomized trial among women with pelvic floor myalgia (PFM) was performed wherein participants received either PT or LTPI. Pain was assessed and 1 month posttreatment completion. Levator-based pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).
Twenty-nine women completed the study (17 had PT, 12 had LTPI). Both groups reported reduction in vaginal pain: mean NRS change from baseline of 4.47 [standard deviation (SD) 2.12) for PT and 4.67 (SD 1.72) for LTPI (p = 0.8)]. A >50 % improvement in NRS was documented among 59 % of women receiving PT and 58 % receiving LTPI (p = 1.0). Consistent with NRS scores, mean PGI-I score was 2.50 (SD 1.17) for PT and 2.17 (SD 1.01) for LTPI (p = 0.5). Mean change in FSFI favored PT [PT +8.87 (SD 5.60), LTPI +4.00 (SD 5.24), p = 0.04], reflecting improvement in the sexual pain domain favoring PT (p = 0.02). However, the time in weeks to effect improvement favored LTPI if controlling for the degree of change in NRS (p = 0.01) and FSFI (p = 0.01).
Vaginal myalgia and sex-related pain improved with pelvic floor PT and LTPI. Time-to-effect improvement and significance of therapy are dependent on treatment type.
我们的目的是确定盆底物理治疗(PT)和提肌触发点注射(LTPI)对性功能及与提肌相关的盆腔疼痛的影响。
对患有盆底肌痛(PFM)的女性进行了一项随机试验,参与者接受PT或LTPI治疗。在治疗结束后1个月评估疼痛情况。使用数字评分量表(NRS)和患者总体改善印象(PGI-I)量表评估与提肌相关的疼痛。使用女性性功能指数(FSFI)评估性功能。
29名女性完成了研究(17名接受PT,12名接受LTPI)。两组均报告阴道疼痛减轻:PT组从基线的平均NRS变化为4.47[标准差(SD)2.12],LTPI组为4.67(SD 1.72)(p = 0.8)。接受PT的女性中有59%和接受LTPI的女性中有58%的NRS改善>50%(p = 1.0)。与NRS评分一致,PT组的平均PGI-I评分为2.50(SD 1.17),LTPI组为2.17(SD 1.01)(p = 0.5)。FSFI的平均变化有利于PT组[PT组+8.87(SD 5.60),LTPI组+4.00(SD 5.24),p = 0.04],反映出在性疼痛领域PT组改善更明显(p = 0.02)。然而,如果控制NRS(p = 0.01)和FSFI(p = 0.01)的变化程度,达到改善效果所需的周数LTPI组更短。
盆底PT和LTPI可改善阴道肌痛和与性相关的疼痛。达到改善效果的时间和治疗的显著性取决于治疗类型。