• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国外科学委员会普通外科认证考试是否存在性别偏见?

Is There Gender Bias on the American Board of Surgery General Surgery Certifying Examination?

机构信息

James Madison University, Center for Assessment and Research Studies, Harrisonburg, Virginia.

The American Board of Surgery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2019 May;237:131-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.014
PMID:30917895
Abstract

BACKGROUND

When oral examinations are administered, examiner subjectivity may possibly affect ratings, particularly when examiner severity is influenced by examinee characteristics (e.g., gender) that are independent of examinee ability. This study explored whether the ratings of the general surgery oral certifying examination (CE) of the American Board of Surgery and likelihood of passing the CE were influenced by the gender of examinees or examiners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data collected from examinees who attempted the general surgery CE in the 2016-2017 academic year were analyzed. There were 1341 examinees (61% male) and 216 examiners (82% male). Factorial analysis of variance and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of examinee and examiner gender on CE ratings and likelihood of passing the CE.

RESULTS

Examinees received similar ratings and had similar likelihood of passing the CE regardless of examinee or examiner genders and different combinations of examiner gender pairs (all P values > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that CE ratings of examinees are not influenced by examinee or examiner gender. There was no evidence of examiner bias due to gender on the CE.

摘要

背景

当进行口头考试时,考官的主观性可能会影响评分,特别是当考官的严格程度受到与考生能力无关的考生特征(例如,性别)的影响时。本研究探讨了美国外科学委员会普通外科口头认证考试(CE)的评分以及考生通过 CE 的可能性是否受到考生或考官性别的影响。

材料和方法

分析了 2016-2017 学年参加普通外科 CE 的考生的数据。共有 1341 名考生(61%为男性)和 216 名考官(82%为男性)。使用方差因子分析和逻辑回归分析来评估考生和考官性别对 CE 评分和通过 CE 的可能性的影响。

结果

无论考生或考官的性别如何,以及考官性别的不同组合如何,考生的评分和通过 CE 的可能性都相似(所有 P 值均>0.05)。

结论

这些结果表明,考生的 CE 评分不受考生或考官性别的影响。CE 上没有证据表明考官存在性别偏见。

相似文献

1
Is There Gender Bias on the American Board of Surgery General Surgery Certifying Examination?美国外科学委员会普通外科认证考试是否存在性别偏见?
J Surg Res. 2019 May;237:131-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
2
Examiner-examinee gender concordance does not impact ratings on the American Board of Surgery Vascular Surgery Certifying Examination.主考性别与考生性别一致不会影响美国外科学会血管外科学认证考试的评分。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1854-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.063. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
3
Review courses for the American Board of Surgery certifying examination do not provide an advantage.针对美国外科委员会认证考试的复习课程并无优势。
Surgery. 2015 Oct;158(4):890-6; discussion 896-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.04.044. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
4
A Look at Demographics and Transition to Virtual Assessments: An Analysis of Bias in the American Board of Surgery General Surgery Certifying Exams.人口统计学与向虚拟评估的转变:美国外科学委员会普通外科认证考试中偏见的分析。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Apr;81(4):578-588. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
5
Association of Demographic and Program Factors With American Board of Surgery Qualifying and Certifying Examinations Pass Rates.人口统计学和项目因素与美国外科学委员会资格认证考试通过率的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 1;155(1):22-30. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4081.
6
Evaluating the effectiveness of a mock oral educational program.评估模拟口腔教育项目的有效性。
J Surg Res. 2016 Oct;205(2):305-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.088. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
7
The American Board of Surgery Certifying Examination: a retrospective study of the decreasing pass rates and performance for first-time examinees.美国外科学委员会认证考试:首次考生通过率和表现下降的回顾性研究。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;69(2):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
8
Using the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination to predict board certification: a cautionary study.利用美国外科委员会住院医师培训考试预测委员会认证:一项警示性研究。
J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;71(6):e144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
9
The public mock oral: a useful tool for examinees and the audience in preparation for the American Board of Surgery Certifying Examination.公众模拟口头考试:美国外科学委员会认证考试考生和观众备考的有用工具。
J Surg Educ. 2010 Jan-Feb;67(1):33-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.10.007.
10
A 5-year review of feedback on the Philadelphia-area mock ABS certifying examination.对费城地区模拟美国骨科学会认证考试反馈的5年回顾。
J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;71(6):e11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program Scores and Written Qualifying Examination Performance.眼科知识评估项目分数与书面资格考试成绩
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.1933.
2
Examining Gender-Based Differences in Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments in Faculty Assessments by Residents and Fellows.研究生和住院医师对教员评估中定量评分和叙述性评论的性别差异研究。
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Jun;17(3):338-346. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00627.1. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
3
Differential attainment in assessment of postgraduate surgical trainees: a scoping review.
研究生外科培训生评估中的差异表现:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 30;24(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05580-2.
4
A scoping review of successful strategies for passing the American Board of Surgery certifying examination.美国外科委员会认证考试成功策略的范围综述
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Dec 31;17:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.12.013. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Surgical Education: Disparities in Education May Impact the Quality and Likelihood of Completion of Training.外科教育:教育方面的差异可能会影响培训的质量和完成培训的可能性。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Mar 8;36(5):315-320. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1763519. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
The importance of USMLE step 2 on the screening and selection of applicants for general surgery residency positions.美国医师执照考试第二步(USMLE step 2)在普通外科住院医师职位申请人筛选和选拔中的重要性。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 27;9(7):e17486. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17486. eCollection 2023 Jul.