• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

打分还是不打分?绩效评估期间员工的自主反应与心理健康

To Rate or Not to Rate? Autonomic Response and Psychological Well-being of Employees During Performance Review.

作者信息

Balconi Michela, Venturella Irene, Fronda Giulia, de Filippis Daniela, Salati Emanuela, Vanutelli Maria Elide

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Department of Psychology Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (Mss Balconi, Venturella, Fronda, and de Filippis); Azienda Trasporti Milanesi (Ms Salati); and Universita degli Studi di Milano (Dr Vanutelli), Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2019 Apr/Jun;38(2):179-186. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000257.

DOI:10.1097/HCM.0000000000000257
PMID:30920993
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Organizational research started including neurosciences exploring pivotal phenomena and promoting organizational well-being. Leadership was investigated by assessing psychophysiological responses during performance review characterized by narrative or quantitative assessments and their effects on employees' well-being. As is known, rating could be perceived as threatening for employees' ranking and status perception, leading to avoidant behaviors.

DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

Here, manager-employee dyads were assigned to 2 conditions: in the nonrate scenario, managers were asked to describe the employee's performance; in the rate one, they had to provide a quantitative rating. Skin conductance level and response and heart rate indices were continuously recorded.

FINDINGS

Dyads in nonrate condition showed higher arousal-related responses (skin conductance level and skin conductance response), perhaps highlighting an increased engagement triggered by a rewarding exchange. Conversely, in rate condition, employees showed higher heart rate, usually related to negative and stressful conditions, and avoidant behaviors.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Results are discussed for their possible applications to employees' well-being.

摘要

未标注

组织研究开始纳入神经科学,以探索关键现象并促进组织福祉。通过评估绩效评估期间的心理生理反应(以叙述性或定量评估为特征)及其对员工福祉的影响来研究领导力。众所周知,评级可能被员工视为对其排名和地位认知的威胁,从而导致回避行为。

设计与方法

在此,将管理者 - 员工二元组分为两种情况:在非评级场景中,要求管理者描述员工的绩效;在评级场景中,他们必须提供定量评级。持续记录皮肤电导水平、反应和心率指标。

研究结果

非评级条件下的二元组表现出与唤醒相关的更高反应(皮肤电导水平和皮肤电导反应),这可能突出了由有回报的交流引发的更高参与度。相反,在评级条件下,员工表现出更高的心率,这通常与负面和压力条件相关,以及回避行为。

原创性/价值:讨论了研究结果在员工福祉方面的可能应用。

相似文献

1
To Rate or Not to Rate? Autonomic Response and Psychological Well-being of Employees During Performance Review.打分还是不打分?绩效评估期间员工的自主反应与心理健康
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2019 Apr/Jun;38(2):179-186. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000257.
2
Correlates of procrastination and performance at work: The role of having "good fit".工作中拖延与绩效的关联因素:“匹配良好”的作用。
J Prev Interv Community. 2018 Jul-Sep;46(3):228-244. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2018.1470187.
3
A study of relationship between managers' leadership style and employees' job satisfaction.管理者领导风格与员工工作满意度之间的关系研究。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2006;19(2-3):xi-xxviii. doi: 10.1108/13660750610665008.
4
Combined effects of workplace bullying and perceived organizational support on employee behaviors: does resource availability help?工作场所欺凌与感知到的组织支持对员工行为的综合影响:资源可用性是否有帮助?
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018 Nov;31(6):654-668. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1521516. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
5
Transforming service employees and climate: a multilevel, multisource examination of transformational leadership in building long-term service relationships.转变服务员工与服务氛围:对构建长期服务关系中变革型领导的多层次、多源考察。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):1006-19. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1006.
6
Optimizing healthcare employee performance: a serial mediation model.优化医疗保健员工绩效:一个串联中介模型。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Oct 18;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):201-223. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2024-0126.
7
Analysis of factors affecting employee satisfaction: A case study from Pakistan.影响员工满意度的因素分析:来自巴基斯坦的案例研究。
Work. 2015;52(1):137-52. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152039.
8
Employees' and line managers' active involvement in participatory organizational interventions: Examining direct, reversed, and reciprocal effects on well-being.员工和直线经理积极参与参与式组织干预措施:检验对幸福感的直接、反向和互惠影响。
Stress Health. 2019 Feb;35(1):69-80. doi: 10.1002/smi.2841. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
9
What Factors Influence Employee Service Recovery Performance and What Are the Consequences in Health Care?哪些因素会影响员工的服务补救绩效,在医疗保健领域这些因素会带来怎样的后果?
Qual Manag Health Care. 2016 Jul-Sep;25(3):162-75. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000104.
10
Beyond safety outcomes: An investigation of the impact of safety climate on job satisfaction, employee engagement and turnover using social exchange theory as the theoretical framework.超越安全结果:以社会交换理论为理论框架,探讨安全氛围对工作满意度、员工敬业度和离职率的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2016 Jul;55:248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain Oscillations and Autonomic Synthonization via Comodulation in Collaborative Negotiation.协作谈判中通过共调制实现的脑振荡与自主同步化
Entropy (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;27(8):873. doi: 10.3390/e27080873.
2
Which type of feedback-Positive or negative- reinforces decision recall? An EEG study.哪种类型的反馈——积极的还是消极的——能增强决策回忆?一项脑电图研究。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2025 Jan 8;18:1524475. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2024.1524475. eCollection 2024.
3
Social Interoception and Autonomic System Reactivity during Synchronization Behavior.
同步行为中的社会内感受与自主神经系统反应性
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 20;14(3):149. doi: 10.3390/bs14030149.
4
Autonomic synchrony induced by hyperscanning interoception during interpersonal synchronization tasks.人际同步任务期间通过超扫描内感受诱发的自主同步。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jul 21;17:1200750. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1200750. eCollection 2023.
5
Bringing social interaction at the core of organizational neuroscience.将社会互动置于组织神经科学的核心。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 17;13:1034454. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1034454. eCollection 2022.
6
The Dialogue Between Two or More Brains: The "Hyperscanning" for Organization.两个或多个大脑之间的对话:用于组织的“超扫描”。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 30;11:598332. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598332. eCollection 2020.