Department of Child Health, TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214475. eCollection 2019.
Developmental milestones are commonly used in child health care, although from many milestones the predictive validity has not been adequately assessed. We aimed to determine the predictive validity of 75 developmental milestones for detecting limited intellectual functioning that can be obtained before the age of 4 years. We performed a case-control study with 148 children aged 5-10 years with limited intellectual functioning (IQ 50-69), who were in special education (cases) and a random sample of 300 children aged 5-10 years who were in regular elementary education (controls). Developmental milestones scores were retrieved from Child Healthcare files. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (LR+) and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) for limited intellectual functioning. The LR+ determines whether a test result changes the probability that a condition exists. Given the prevalence of intellectual disability (1-3%), we considered that an LR+ > 10 would be clinically useful, as it increases the a priori probability of limited intellectual functioning from 2% to a posteriori probability of at least 17%. Out of 75 assessed milestones, 50 were included in the analysis. We found nine milestones to have a significant adjusted (for socio-economic status and prematurity) DOR > 1 and a significant LR+ > 10 (assessment age in months between brackets): 'says "dada-baba‴ (9), 'balances head well while sitting' (9), 'sits on buttocks while legs stretched' (9), 'babbles while playing' (12), 'sits in stable position without support' (12), 'walks well alone' (24), 'says "sentences" of 3 or more words' (36), 'places 3 forms in form-box' (36) and 'copies circle' (48). Sensitivities of these 9 milestones varied from 8-54%, specificities of these 9 milestones varied from 95-100%. Combining these milestones at 9, 12, and 36 months respectively resulted in sensitivities of 27-60% and specificities of 94-99%. These nine developmental milestones have substantial predictive validity for limited intellectual functioning.
发育里程碑在儿童保健中被广泛应用,尽管其中许多里程碑的预测有效性尚未得到充分评估。我们旨在确定 75 项发育里程碑在检测 4 岁前有限智力功能方面的预测有效性。我们进行了一项病例对照研究,纳入了 148 名 5-10 岁患有有限智力功能(智商 50-69)的儿童,这些儿童在特殊教育中(病例),并随机抽取了 300 名 5-10 岁在普通小学教育中的儿童作为对照组(对照组)。从儿童保健档案中获取发育里程碑评分。我们计算了有限智力功能的敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(LR+)和诊断比值比(DOR)。LR+确定测试结果是否改变了疾病存在的可能性。鉴于智力残疾的患病率(1-3%),我们认为 LR+>10 将具有临床意义,因为它将有限智力功能的先验概率从 2%提高到了至少 17%的后验概率。在评估的 75 个里程碑中,有 50 个被纳入分析。我们发现 9 个里程碑具有显著的调整后(针对社会经济地位和早产)DOR>1 和显著的 LR+>10(括号中为评估年龄):“说“爸爸-妈妈”(9),“坐时能很好地平衡头部”(9),“双腿伸展时坐在臀部上”(9),“玩耍时自言自语”(12),“能在无支撑的情况下稳定地坐着”(12),“能独立行走”(24),“说 3 个或更多单词的句子”(36),“将 3 个形状放入形状盒中”(36)和“复制圆圈”(48)。这 9 个里程碑的敏感性从 8-54%不等,特异性从 95-100%不等。分别在 9、12 和 36 个月时结合这些里程碑,敏感性为 27-60%,特异性为 94-99%。这 9 项发育里程碑对有限的智力功能具有很强的预测有效性。