Rivera Navarro Jesús, Franco Tejero Manuel, Conde Espejo Paloma, Sandín Vázquez María, Gutiérrez Sastre Marta, Cebrecos Alba, Sainz Muñoz Adelino, Gittelsohn Joel
Sociology and Communication Department, Social Sciences Faculty, Salamanca, Spain.
Social and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares (Madrid), Spain; Global Obesity Prevention Center, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (Maryland), United States of America; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, (Maryland), United States of America.
Gac Sanit. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):517-522. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
Qualitative methods may help to understand features related to health urban inequalities as a way to include citizens' perceptions of their neighbourhoods in relation to their health-related behaviours. The aim of this article is to describe the methods and design of a qualitative urban health study.
The Heart Healthy Hoods (HHH) analyses cardiovascular health in an urban environment using mixed methods: electronic health records, quantitative individual questionnaires, physical examination, semi-structured Interviews (SSIs), focus groups (FGs) and participatory technics such as photovoice. This article focuses on the HHH qualitative methods and design. A case study was used to select three neighbourhoods in Madrid with different socioeconomic levels: low, medium, and high. The selection process for these three neighbourhoods was as follows: classification of all Madrid's neighbourhoods (128) according to their socioeconomic level; after ranking this classification, nine neighbourhoods, three by socioeconomic level, were short-listed; different urban sociology criteria and non-participant observation were used for the final selection of three neighbourhoods. After selecting the three neighbourhoods, thirty SSIs were held with residents and six SSIs were held with key informants. Finally, twenty-nine FGs will be conducted over the course of 8 months, between May and December of 2018.
Systematization in the selection of neighbourhoods and the use of adequate techniques are essential for the qualitative study of urban health inequalities.
定性方法可能有助于理解与城市健康不平等相关的特征,以此将居民对其社区与健康相关行为的认知纳入考量。本文旨在描述一项定性城市健康研究的方法与设计。
“健康心脏社区”(HHH)采用混合方法分析城市环境中的心血管健康状况,包括电子健康记录、定量个人问卷、体格检查、半结构化访谈(SSIs)、焦点小组(FGs)以及诸如照片声音等参与式技术。本文聚焦于HHH的定性方法与设计。采用案例研究法在马德里选取了三个社会经济水平不同的社区:低、中、高。这三个社区的选取过程如下:根据社会经济水平对马德里所有社区(128个)进行分类;对该分类进行排名后,筛选出九个社区,每个社会经济水平各三个;最终通过不同的城市社会学标准和非参与式观察选定三个社区。选定这三个社区后,与居民进行了30次半结构化访谈,并与关键信息提供者进行了6次半结构化访谈。最后,将于2018年5月至12月的8个月时间内开展29次焦点小组访谈。
社区选择的系统化以及适当技术的运用对于城市健康不平等的定性研究至关重要。