Nephrology Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
Nephrology Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):904-910. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
The association of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors with survival rates of nursing home (NH) residents with treated end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is unclear. We examined whether race/ethnicity, ZIP code-level, and individual-level indicators of poverty relate to mortality of NH residents on dialysis.
Retrospective cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Using the United States Renal Data System database, we identified 56,194 nursing home residents initiated on maintenance dialysis from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2013, followed until May 31, 2014.
We evaluated baseline characteristics of the NH cohort on dialysis, including race and ethnicity. We assessed the Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status as an indicator of individual-level poverty and ZIP code-level median household income (MHI) data. We conducted Cox regression analyses with all-cause mortality as the outcome variable, adjusted for clinical and sociodemographic factors including end-of-life preferences.
Adjusted Cox analysis showed a significantly lower risk of death among black vs nonblack NH residents [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89, 0.94]. Dual-eligibility status was significantly associated with lower risk of death compared to those with Medicare alone (AHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.78, 0.82). Compared to those in higher MHI quintile levels, NH ESRD patients in the lowest quintile were significantly associated with higher risk of death (AHR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06, 1.13).
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Black and Hispanic NH residents on dialysis had an apparent survival advantage. This "survival paradox" occurs despite well-documented racial/ethnic disparities in ESRD and NH care and warrants further exploration that could generate new insights into means of improving survival of all NH residents on dialysis. Area-level indicator of poverty was independently associated with mortality, whereas dual-eligibility status for Medicare and Medicaid was associated with lower risk of death, which could be partly explained by improved access to care.
种族、民族和社会经济因素与接受治疗的终末期肾病(ESRD)的养老院(NH)居民的生存率之间的关系尚不清楚。我们研究了种族/民族、ZIP 代码级别和个人贫困指标是否与 NH 透析患者的死亡率有关。
回顾性队列研究。
参与者/设置:我们使用美国肾脏数据系统数据库,确定了 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日期间开始维持性透析的 56,194 名 NH 居民,并随访至 2014 年 5 月 31 日。
我们评估了 NH 透析队列的基线特征,包括种族和民族。我们评估了医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格状况作为个人贫困水平的指标,以及 ZIP 代码级别中位数家庭收入(MHI)数据。我们进行了 Cox 回归分析,以全因死亡率为结局变量,调整了临床和社会人口学因素,包括临终前的偏好。
调整后的 Cox 分析显示,与非黑人 NH 居民相比,黑人 NH 居民的死亡风险显著降低[调整后的危险比(AHR)0.91,95%置信区间(CI)0.89,0.94]。与仅拥有医疗保险的患者相比,双重资格状态与较低的死亡风险显著相关(AHR 0.80,95%CI 0.78,0.82)。与较高的 MHI 五分位水平相比,最低五分位的 NH ESRD 患者的死亡风险明显较高(AHR 1.09,95%CI 1.06,1.13)。
结论/意义:接受透析治疗的黑人 NH 居民和西班牙裔 NH 居民的生存优势明显。这种“生存悖论”尽管在 ESRD 和 NH 护理方面存在有据可查的种族/民族差异,但仍需要进一步探讨,这可能会为提高所有 NH 透析患者的生存提供新的思路。区域贫困指标与死亡率独立相关,而医疗保险和医疗补助的双重资格与较低的死亡风险相关,这可能部分解释为获得更好的护理机会。