• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交网络中的供精者信息披露:异性恋夫妇的经验。

Donor insemination disclosure in social networks: heterosexual couples' experiences.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Cult Health Sex. 2020 Mar;22(3):292-306. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1589578. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1080/13691058.2019.1589578
PMID:30931807
Abstract

The way in which heterosexual couples manage information about infertility and donor insemination within their social networks has not yet been explored in-depth. This study focuses on how parents and aspiring parents manage information about infertility and donor insemination within their social networks. Fifteen Belgian couples were interviewed as part of a parenthood research project. Thematic analysis resulted in the identification of four themes. The first of these reveals how the social context can best be understood as a continuous confrontation with social expectations. A second theme highlights the diverse ways in which couples manage personal information in this confronting context. The third theme stresses how couples manage information about donor insemination so as to be treated as a 'normal' family. The final theme shows how emotional regulation within the context of the extended family plays a role in couples' decisions about how to manage information with relatives. Results are analysed using the concept of 'systemic emotion management' and the importance of being seen by others as a 'normal' family. Study findings signal the importance of managing information within social networks and are of relevance to a range of practitioners.

摘要

异性恋夫妇在社交网络中管理不孕和供精信息的方式尚未得到深入探讨。本研究聚焦于父母和准父母在社交网络中如何管理不孕和供精信息。作为一项生育研究项目的一部分,对 15 对比利时夫妇进行了采访。主题分析确定了四个主题。第一个主题揭示了社会背景如何最好地被理解为与社会期望的持续对抗。第二个主题强调了夫妇在这种对抗性背景下管理个人信息的多种方式。第三个主题强调了夫妇如何管理供精信息,以使自己被视为一个“正常”的家庭。最后一个主题表明,在大家庭的背景下进行情绪调节如何在夫妇决定如何与亲戚管理信息方面发挥作用。研究结果使用“系统情绪管理”的概念和被他人视为“正常”家庭的重要性进行分析。研究结果表明了在社交网络中管理信息的重要性,与一系列从业者有关。

相似文献

1
Donor insemination disclosure in social networks: heterosexual couples' experiences.社交网络中的供精者信息披露:异性恋夫妇的经验。
Cult Health Sex. 2020 Mar;22(3):292-306. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1589578. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
2
How couples' experiences prior to the start of infertility treatment with donor gametes influence the disclosure decision.夫妇在接受供精治疗前的经历如何影响披露决策。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;76(2):125-32. doi: 10.1159/000353901. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
3
Beyond sperm cells: a qualitative study on constructed meanings of the sperm donor in lesbian families.超越精子细胞:对女同性恋家庭中精子捐赠者构建意义的定性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1248-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu060. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
4
Positioning the donor in a new landscape-mothers' and fathers' experiences as their adult children obtained information about the identity-release sperm donor.将供体置于新的环境中——父母在其成年子女获取有关身份释放精子供体的信息时的体验。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jul 19;36(8):2181-2188. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab146.
5
Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.身份公开供精或供卵治疗后 111 对夫妇的披露行为和意向:随访至子女 1-4 岁。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Oct;27(10):2998-3007. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des285. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
6
Fear, fascination and the sperm donor as 'abjection' in interviews with heterosexual recipients of donor insemination.在对接受供精人工授精的异性恋者的访谈中,恐惧、着迷与作为“令人厌恶之物”的精子捐赠者
Sociol Health Illn. 2009 Jul;31(5):705-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01171.x. Epub 2009 May 12.
7
The Meaning of the Sperm Donor for Heterosexual Couples: Confirming the Position of the Father.精子捐赠者对异性恋伴侣的意义:确认父亲的地位。
Fam Process. 2017 Mar;56(1):203-216. doi: 10.1111/famp.12156. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
8
Helping parents to tell their children about the use of donor insemination (DI) and determining their opinions about open-identity sperm donors.帮助父母告知孩子关于使用供体人工授精(DI)的情况,并确定他们对公开身份精子供体的看法。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(1):78-81. doi: 10.1080/00016340500334851.
9
Female-partnered and single women's contact motivations and experiences with donor-linked families.女性伴侣和单身女性与供体家庭联系的动机和经历。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Jun;30(6):1375-85. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev077. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
10
'Of course he's our child': transitions in social parenthood in donor sperm recipient families.“他当然是我们的孩子”:供精受孕家庭中社会父母身份的转变。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Jan;28(1):106-15. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' disclosure to their donor-conceived children in the last 10 years and factors affecting disclosure: a narrative review.近 10 年来父母对其捐精受孕子女的披露情况,以及影响披露的因素:叙事性综述。
Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Jul 1;30(4):488-527. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmae010.