Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1248-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu060. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
What meanings do lesbian couples construct regarding their sperm donor?
For some parents, the donor was increasingly presented as a person, whereas for other parents, the donor was seen as an instrument from the moment they received the sperm donation.
Few studies specifically focus on how lesbian couples deal with the issue of third-party anonymous gamete donation. It is often assumed that they have fewer difficulties than heterosexual couples with the involvement of a male procreator, since their status as a donor conception family is 'socially visible' and there is no social father who fears exclusion.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 lesbian couples (20 participants), recruited via the Ghent University Hospital. All couples had at least one child, conceived through anonymous donor insemination, between 7 and 10 years old.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Within the data corpus, a particular data set was analyzed where couples referred to their donor and his position in their family. Step-by-step inductive thematic analysis was performed resulting in themes that are grounded in the data. All phases of the analysis were followed by team discussion.
This study reveals different donor constructs, indicating different ways of dealing with the third-party involvement in the family. Some parents diminish the role of the donor throughout family life and continue to present him as an instrument: something they needed in order to become parents. Others show an increasing interest in the donor as the children mature, which results in a more personalized account of the donor.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: In our qualitative cross-sectional study, we collected retrospectively constructed stories. Longitudinal qualitative and quantitative research is required to allow for an extrapolation of the conclusions made.
This study shows how the concept of the donor is constructed within lesbian families and how it is challenged by the child's developing personality and features. When counseling prospective parents, it could therefore be useful to discuss the concept of the anonymous donor beyond the conception phase.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The project was funded by the Research Fund of Ghent University, Belgium. There are no competing interests.
女同性恋伴侣如何看待她们的捐精者?
对于一些父母来说,捐精者越来越被视为一个人,而对于另一些父母来说,从收到精子捐赠的那一刻起,捐精者就被视为一种工具。
很少有研究专门关注女同性恋伴侣如何处理第三方匿名配子捐赠的问题。人们通常认为,与异性恋伴侣相比,她们在涉及男性生育者方面遇到的困难较少,因为她们作为捐精受孕家庭的身份“在社会上可见”,而且没有担心被排斥的社会父亲。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:通过根特大学医院招募了 10 对女同性恋伴侣(20 名参与者)进行半结构化访谈。所有的夫妇都至少有一个孩子,通过匿名供精人工授精,年龄在 7 到 10 岁之间。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:在数据集中,分析了一个特别的数据集,其中夫妇提到了他们的供精者及其在家庭中的地位。采用逐步归纳主题分析,得出的主题扎根于数据。分析的所有阶段都经过团队讨论。
这项研究揭示了不同的供精者构建,表明了处理家庭中第三方参与的不同方式。一些父母在整个家庭生活中削弱供精者的角色,并继续将他视为一种工具:他们成为父母所需要的东西。另一些人则随着孩子的成长,对供精者越来越感兴趣,这导致了对供精者更个性化的描述。
局限性、谨慎的原因:在我们的定性横断面研究中,我们回顾性地收集了构建的故事。需要进行纵向定性和定量研究,以便对得出的结论进行推断。
这项研究表明了供精者的概念在女同性恋家庭中是如何构建的,以及孩子发展的个性和特征是如何对其构成挑战的。因此,在为准父母提供咨询时,除了受孕阶段之外,讨论匿名供精者的概念可能会很有用。
研究资金/竞争利益:该项目由比利时根特大学研究基金资助。没有竞争利益。