UOC Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Sassari and Università di Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 1;9(1):5426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41994-5.
Raised circulating concentrations of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), have been reported in several rheumatic diseases (RDs). However, the strength of this relationship is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the magnitude and the robustness of the association between ADMA concentrations and RDs. We calculated standardized mean differences (SMD, with 95% confidence intervals, CI). Study heterogeneity was evaluated by meta-regressions and sensitivity analyses according to type of RDs, conventional cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers, and type of ADMA assessment methodology. Thirty-seven studies with a total of 2,982 subjects (1,860 RDs patients and 1,122 healthy controls) were included in our meta-analysis. Pooled results showed that ADMA concentrations were significantly higher in patients with RDs than in healthy controls (SMD = 1.27 µmol/L, 95% CI 0.94-1.60 µmol/L; p < 0.001). However, the between-studies heterogeneity was high. Differences in ADMA concentrations between controls and RDs patients were not significantly associated with inflammatory markers, increasing age, lipid concentrations, body mass index, blood pressure, or methodology used to assess ADMA. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed no difference across RDs. This meta-analysis showed that, in the context of significant between-study heterogeneity, circulating concentrations of ADMA are positively related to RDs.
已有研究报道,几种风湿性疾病(RDs)患者体内循环的不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)浓度升高,ADMA 是一氧化氮合酶(NOS)的内源性抑制剂。然而,这种相关性的强度尚不清楚。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估 ADMA 浓度与 RDs 之间的关联强度和稳健性。我们计算了标准化均数差(SMD,95%置信区间,CI)。根据 RDs 的类型、传统心血管危险因素、炎症标志物和 ADMA 评估方法的类型,通过荟萃回归和敏感性分析来评估研究的异质性。我们的荟萃分析共纳入了 37 项研究,总计 2982 名受试者(1860 名 RDs 患者和 1122 名健康对照者)。汇总结果表明,RDs 患者的 ADMA 浓度明显高于健康对照组(SMD=1.27µmol/L,95%CI 0.94-1.60µmol/L;p<0.001)。然而,研究间存在高度异质性。ADMA 浓度在对照组和 RDs 患者之间的差异与炎症标志物、年龄增长、脂质浓度、体重指数、血压或评估 ADMA 的方法无关。此外,亚组分析表明 RDs 之间没有差异。本荟萃分析表明,在存在显著研究间异质性的情况下,循环 ADMA 浓度与 RDs 呈正相关。