• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《残疾人权利公约》第十二条:在法律面前获得平等承认

Article 12 CRPD: Equal Recognition before the Law

作者信息

Series Lucy, Nilsson Anna

机构信息

School of Law and Politics, Cardiff University (

Department of Law, Lund University (

PMID:30933458
Abstract

The right to equal recognition before the law is concerned with legal personality – the ability to bear rights and duties under law, and legal capacity – whether and how one can exercise, claim or defend those rights, and the assumption of legal liability. Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is concerned with how legal systems themselves enable and disable people as legal actors. In the view of the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (‘CRPD Committee’) and many of those involved in negotiating article 12, it introduces a new paradigm of ‘universal legal capacity’, that cannot be limited on grounds of disability or mental incapacity. The CRPD Committee maintains that this requires the abolition of all forms of substitute decision making. This interpretation of article 12 is contested in the literature, but for many involved in the disability movement, ending guardianship and other forms of substitute decision making is central to wider advocacy goals of ending institutionalisation, forced treatment, and loss of fundamental citizenship rights such as the ability to vote, marry and own property.

摘要

在法律面前获得平等承认的权利涉及法律人格——即在法律上承担权利和义务的能力,以及法律行为能力——即一个人是否以及如何能够行使、主张或捍卫这些权利,以及承担法律责任。《联合国残疾人权利公约》(CRPD)第十二条关注的是法律制度本身如何使人们成为或无法成为法律行为主体。根据联合国残疾人权利委员会(“CRPD委员会”)以及许多参与第十二条谈判的人的观点,该条引入了一种“普遍法律行为能力”的新范式,这种能力不能因残疾或精神无行为能力而受到限制。CRPD委员会坚持认为,这需要废除所有形式的替代决策。对第十二条的这种解释在文献中存在争议,但对于许多参与残疾运动的人来说,结束监护和其他形式的替代决策是更广泛的倡导目标的核心,这些目标包括结束机构化、强制治疗以及丧失基本公民权利,如投票、结婚和拥有财产的能力。

相似文献

1
Article 12 CRPD: Equal Recognition before the Law《残疾人权利公约》第十二条:在法律面前获得平等承认
2
"Capacity", "best interests", "will and preferences" and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.“能力”、“最大利益”、“意愿和偏好”与《联合国残疾人权利公约》。
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):34-41. doi: 10.1002/wps.20584.
3
The impact of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on Victorian guardianship practice.《联合国残疾人权利公约》对维多利亚州监护实践的影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2806-2814. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1836680. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
4
Legal capacity of persons with disabilities in Ethiopia: The need to reform existing legal frameworks.埃塞俄比亚残疾人的法律行为能力:改革现有法律框架的必要性。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017 Nov-Dec;55:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
5
[The influence of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on the German jurisdiction and legalisation regarding compulsory measures].[《联合国残疾人权利公约》对德国关于强制手段的司法管辖权及合法化的影响]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2018 Aug;86(8):485-492. doi: 10.1055/a-0597-2031. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
6
Is the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Impacting Mental Health Laws and Policies in High-Income Countries? A Case Study of Implementation in Canada.《联合国残疾人权利公约》对高收入国家的精神卫生法律和政策有影响吗?以加拿大的实施情况为例
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Nov 11;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0103-1.
7
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a new approach to decision-making in mental health law.《联合国残疾人权利公约》:精神卫生法决策的新方法。
Eur J Health Law. 2012 Dec;19(5):423-40. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341237.
8
Supportive/Substitute Decision-making and Capacity in Victoria: Compliance with Australia's Obligations under the CRPD?维多利亚州的支持性/替代性决策和能力:符合《残疾人权利公约》下的澳大利亚义务?
J Law Med. 2023 Dec;30(4):907-916.
9
Supported Decision-Making and Paradigm Shifts: Word Play or Real Change?支持性决策与范式转变:文字游戏还是真正的变革?
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 11;11:571005. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.571005. eCollection 2020.
10
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Social Work: Evidence for Impact?《联合国残疾人权利公约》与社会工作:影响证据?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 16;20(20):6927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206927.