Is a Chest Tube Necessary after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Mediastinal Tumor Resection?

BACKGROUND

The omission of chest tubes after thoracoscopic procedures such as sympathectomy, lung biopsy, and lung resection has proven efficacious in decreasing pain and length of hospital stay in some cases. However, its safety for mediastinal diseases remains unclear. This study evaluated the feasibility and outcome of eliminating chest drains after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for mediastinal tumor resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 70 patients receiving VATS mediastinal tumor resection in a single institution between January 2016 and November 2018. A total of 39 patients (drain group) received postoperative chest drains and 31 patients (no-drain group) did not. Group clinical outcomes and operation data were compared. A propensity score matching analysis was further performed to yield a fairer comparison.

RESULTS

Before propensity score matching, the no-drain group had a higher prevalence of cystic lesions, a shorter operative time, and less blood loss compared with the drain group ( = 0.015,  = 0.018, and  < 0.001, respectively). After matching, the group differences in these perioperative variables lost significance ( = 0.095, 0.4, and 0.2, respectively). The no-drain group had lower postoperative day 2 pain scores and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the drain group, regardless of whether they were matched (pain:  = 0.028; hospital stay < 0.001) or not (pain:  = 0.003; hospital stay < 0.001). No major adverse events occurred in either group during hospitalization or follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Eliminating chest drain placement after VATS mediastinal tumor resection may benefit some patients and decrease postoperative pain and hospital stay without increasing complications or compromising patient safety.