• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸腔镜手术后同一患者剑突下与肋间伤口疼痛的同步比较

Simultaneous Comparison of Subxiphoid and Intercostal Wound Pain in the Same Patients Following Thoracoscopic Surgery.

作者信息

Liu Yu-Wei, Chou Shah-Hwa, Chou Andre, Kao Chieh-Ni

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan.

School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 18;11(8):2254. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082254.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11082254
PMID:35456345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9030809/
Abstract

There is a lack of data comparing postoperative pain after subxiphoid and intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Pain is an individual's subjective experience and, therefore, difficult to compare between different individuals subjected to either procedure. This study assessed reported pain at six postoperative time points in the same patients receiving both subxiphoid and intercostal incisions for thoracic disease. Data from 44 patients who received simultaneous combined intercostal and subxiphoid VATS were retrospectively analyzed from August 2019 to July 2021. All patients received the same length of subxiphoid and intercostal incisions with or without drain placements. A numerical pain rating scale was administered on postoperative days (POD)-1, POD-2, POD-Discharge, POD-30, POD-90, and POD-180. Bilateral uniportal VATS was performed in 11 patients, and unilateral multiportal VATS was performed in 33 patients. In the unilateral VATS group, there were no differences in pain reported for both incisions in the early postoperative period. However, in the bilateral VATS group, subxiphoid wounds resulted in significantly higher pain scores on POD-1, POD-2, and POD-Discharge ( = 0.0003, 0.001, and 0.03, respectively). Higher late (3 and 6 months) postoperative pain was associated with intercostal incisions in both groups, as previously reported, whereas higher early (day 1, 2, and discharge) postoperative pain was more associated with subxiphoid incisions than intercostal incisions in the bilateral VATS group.

摘要

目前缺乏关于剑突下与肋间电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)术后疼痛比较的数据。疼痛是个人的主观体验,因此,很难在接受这两种手术的不同个体之间进行比较。本研究评估了同一组因胸部疾病接受剑突下和肋间切口的患者在术后六个时间点报告的疼痛情况。对2019年8月至2021年7月期间44例同时接受肋间和剑突下联合VATS的患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。所有患者接受相同长度的剑突下和肋间切口,有或没有放置引流管。在术后第1天(POD-1)、第2天(POD-2)、出院日(POD-出院)、第30天(POD-30)、第90天(POD-90)和第180天(POD-180)采用数字疼痛评分量表进行评估。11例患者进行了双侧单孔VATS,33例患者进行了单侧多孔VATS。在单侧VATS组中,术后早期两种切口报告的疼痛没有差异。然而,在双侧VATS组中,剑突下伤口在POD-1、POD-2和POD-出院时的疼痛评分显著更高(分别为=0.0003、0.001和0.03)。如先前报道,两组术后晚期(3个月和6个月)较高的疼痛与肋间切口有关,而在双侧VATS组中,术后早期(第1天、第2天和出院时)较高的疼痛与剑突下切口的相关性高于肋间切口。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/07b9a32be3b4/jcm-11-02254-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/941a3c905ff4/jcm-11-02254-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/a76b1a1ca76f/jcm-11-02254-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/ea6ac579b74b/jcm-11-02254-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/20e2980f94aa/jcm-11-02254-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/364723b4d6d8/jcm-11-02254-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/246569c49012/jcm-11-02254-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/07b9a32be3b4/jcm-11-02254-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/941a3c905ff4/jcm-11-02254-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/a76b1a1ca76f/jcm-11-02254-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/ea6ac579b74b/jcm-11-02254-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/20e2980f94aa/jcm-11-02254-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/364723b4d6d8/jcm-11-02254-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/246569c49012/jcm-11-02254-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c68e/9030809/07b9a32be3b4/jcm-11-02254-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Simultaneous Comparison of Subxiphoid and Intercostal Wound Pain in the Same Patients Following Thoracoscopic Surgery.胸腔镜手术后同一患者剑突下与肋间伤口疼痛的同步比较
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 18;11(8):2254. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082254.
2
Subxiphoid vs intercostal single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: A randomised controlled trial.剑突下入路与肋间单切口电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jun;30:99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
3
Comparison of post-operative pain and quality of life between uniportal subxiphoid and intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.剑突下单孔与肋间电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术后疼痛及生活质量的比较
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jul;12(7):3582-3590. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-425.
4
Subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy: a report of 105 cases.剑突下单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术:105例报告
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Mar;8(Suppl 3):S251-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.02.32.
5
The Feasibility and Advantages of Subxiphoid Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Lobectomy.经剑突下单操作孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术行肺叶切除术的可行性和优势。
World J Surg. 2019 Jul;43(7):1841-1849. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04948-6.
6
Double sternal elevation subxiphoid versus uniportal thoracoscopic thymectomy associated with superior clearance for stage I-II thymic epithelial tumors: Subxiphoid thymectomy compared with VATS.剑突下双胸骨抬高术与单孔胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗Ⅰ-Ⅱ期胸腺上皮肿瘤的上纵隔清扫效果比较:剑突下胸腺切除术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术的对比
Surgery. 2022 Jul;172(1):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.034. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
7
Subxiphoid versus lateral intercostal approaches thoracoscopic thymectomy for non-myasthenic early-stage thymoma: A propensity score -matched analysis.剑突下入路与侧胸壁入路胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗非重症肌无力早期胸腺瘤:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Jul;67:13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
8
Comparison of Subxiphoid and Intercostal Uniportal Thoracoscopic Thymectomy for Nonmyasthenic Early-Stage Thymoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.经胸骨下和肋间单孔胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗非重症肌无力早期胸腺瘤的比较:回顾性单中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;69(2):173-180. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713878. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
Combination of subxiphoid and intercostal uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral lung lesions: report of two cases and review of the literature.剑突下与肋间单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术联合治疗双侧肺部病变:2例报告及文献复习
Postgrad Med. 2017 Jun;129(5):513-516. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1324229. Epub 2017 May 5.
10
Subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic middle lobectomy and anterior anatomic segmentectomy (S3).剑突下单孔电视辅助胸腔镜下中叶切除术及前侧解剖性段切除术(S3)
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Mar;8(3):540-3. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.02.63.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of subxiphoid and intercostal uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.剑突下与肋间单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗早期非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Feb;41(2):359-365. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.2.11096.
2
Evolution of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: optimization and advancements.单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术的发展:优化与进展
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):4839-4843. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-647. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Uniportal and three-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery pulmonary lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer (UNIT trial): study protocol of a single-center randomized trial.单孔与三孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术治疗早期肺癌(UNIT试验):一项单中心随机试验的研究方案
Trials. 2021 Feb 25;22(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05115-w.
2
Adjuvant chemotherapy as a risk factor for chronic postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a 10-year single-centre retrospective study.辅助化疗是电视辅助胸腔镜手术后慢性术后疼痛的危险因素:一项 10 年单中心回顾性研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jan 22;32(2):276-283. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa250.
3
Comparison of post-operative pain and quality of life between uniportal subxiphoid and intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.
剑突下单孔与肋间电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术后疼痛及生活质量的比较
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jul;12(7):3582-3590. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-425.
4
Early outcomes in 147 consecutive cases of subxiphoid single-port thymectomy and evaluation of learning curves.147 例剑突下单孔胸腺切除术的早期结果及学习曲线评估。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 1;58(Suppl_1):i44-i49. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa183.
5
Simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic blebs excision reduces contralateral recurrence in patients undergoing operation for ipsilateral primary spontaneous pneumothorax.同期双侧电视胸腔镜肺大疱切除术降低了同侧原发性自发性气胸手术患者对侧复发的风险。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;159(3):1120-1127.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
Multiportal subxiphoid thoracoscopic major pulmonary resections.剑突下多端口胸腔镜下肺大部切除术
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jul;11(7):2778-2787. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.21.
7
Uniportal and three-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: analysis of the Italian video-assisted thoracic surgery group database.单孔与三孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术:意大利电视辅助胸腔镜手术组数据库分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Nov 1;29(5):714-721. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz153.
8
Subxiphoid versus intercostal uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral lung resections: a single-institution experience.剑突下与肋间单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术用于双侧肺切除术:单机构经验
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Feb 1;57(2):343-349. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz206.
9
The Feasibility and Advantages of Subxiphoid Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Lobectomy.经剑突下单操作孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术行肺叶切除术的可行性和优势。
World J Surg. 2019 Jul;43(7):1841-1849. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04948-6.
10
Is a Chest Tube Necessary after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Mediastinal Tumor Resection?电视胸腔镜纵隔肿瘤切除术后是否需要放置胸腔引流管?
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;69(2):181-188. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683879. Epub 2019 Apr 1.