• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Five good reasons to be disappointed with randomized trials.对随机试验感到失望的五个充分理由。
J Man Manip Ther. 2019 May;27(2):63-65. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1589697. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
The tactics of large randomized trials.大随机试验的策略。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94 Suppl 1:19-23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00189.
3
Challenges of cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验的挑战。
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 May;3(3):271-81. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.21.
4
Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.伪整群随机化解决了临床试验中的选择偏倚和污染问题。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;59(4):381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.003. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
5
Cheap research is likely to be biased.廉价的研究可能存在偏差。
Complement Ther Med. 2002 Jun;10(2):59-60. doi: 10.1054/ctim.2002.0532.
6
Reading clinical research--what can we expect to learn from reading randomized clinical trials?阅读临床研究——我们期望从阅读随机临床试验中学到什么？
Md Med. 2002 Winter;3(1):35-8.
7
Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.调查荟萃分析中的患者排除偏倚。
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;34(1):79-87. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh300. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
8
Controversies in acupuncture research: selection of controls and outcome measures in acupuncture clinical trials.针灸研究中的争议：针灸临床试验中的对照选择与结局指标
J Altern Complement Med. 2006 Dec;12(10):943-53. doi: 10.1089/acm.2006.12.943.
9
Bias in recruitment to cluster randomized trials: a review of recent publications.群组随机对照试验中招募的偏倚：近期出版物综述。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Aug;18(4):878-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01700.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
10
Local IRBs, multicenter trials, and the ethics of internal amendments.当地的机构审查委员会、多中心试验与内部修订的伦理问题
IRB. 2005 Jul-Aug;27(4):7-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a Specialist Nurse-Led Post-Coronary Heart Disease Support Program: A Prospective Pre-Post Interventional Study.一项由专科护士主导的冠心病后支持项目的评估：一项前瞻性干预前后研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;12(24):2497. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12242497.
2
Revisiting ecological fallacy: are single-case experimental study designs even more relevant in the era of precision medicine?重新审视生态谬误：在精准医学时代，单病例实验研究设计是否更具相关性？
Precis Clin Med. 2024 Oct 18;7(4):pbae025. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbae025. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Navigating foster care: how parental drug use and caregiver attitudes shape children's mentalization processes-an exploratory longitudinal follow-up study: study protocol.探索寄养照料：父母药物使用及照料者态度如何塑造儿童的心理化过程——一项探索性纵向随访研究：研究方案
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 13;15:1295809. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295809. eCollection 2024.
4
Decoding the Misinformation-Legislation Pipeline: an analysis of Florida Medicaid and the current state of transgender healthcare.解码错误信息立法管道：佛罗里达州医疗补助计划和当前跨性别医疗保健状况分析。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2023 Oct 2;111(4):750-761. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1724.
5
Vitamin D and Periodontal Health: A Systematic Review.维生素D与牙周健康：一项系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):e47773. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47773. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Plain Language vs Standard Format for Youth Understanding of COVID-19 Recommendations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.普通语言与标准格式对青少年理解 COVID-19 推荐意见的影响：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Sep 1;177(9):956-965. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.2686.
7
Shoulder Range of Motion Measurements and Baseball Elbow Injuries: Ambiguity in Scientific Models, Approach, and Execution is Hurting Overhead Athlete Health.肩部活动范围测量与棒球肘损伤：科学模型、方法及实施中的模糊性正在损害过头运动员的健康。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Dec 12;5(1):e297-e304. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.11.001. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Post-traumatic stress disorder interventions for children and adolescents affected by war in low- and middle-income countries in the Middle East: systematic review.中东低收入和中等收入国家受战争影响的儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍干预措施：系统评价
BJPsych Open. 2022 Aug 8;8(5):e153. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.552.
9
Protocol for a multicenter, randomised controlled trial of surgeon-directed home therapy vs. outpatient rehabilitation by physical therapists for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the SHORT trial.一项关于外科医生指导的家庭治疗与物理治疗师门诊康复治疗用于反式全肩关节置换术的多中心随机对照试验方案：SHORT试验
Arch Physiother. 2021 Dec 10;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00121-2.
10
"I'm in a very good frame of mind": a qualitative exploration of the experience of standing frame use in people with progressive multiple sclerosis.“我状态很好”：使用站立架对进展性多发性硬化症患者的体验进行定性研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):e037680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037680.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal Mediation Analysis With Observational Data: Considerations and Illustration Examining Mechanisms Linking Neighborhood Poverty to Adolescent Substance Use.基于观察性数据的因果中介分析：考虑和说明检验邻里贫困与青少年物质使用之间关联机制的实例
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar 1;188(3):598-608. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy248.
2
Randomized controlled trials: Often flawed, mostly useless, clearly indispensable: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.随机对照试验：常常存在缺陷，大多毫无用处，但显然不可或缺：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:53-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
3
Challenging the hegemony of randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.挑战随机对照试验的霸权：对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:60-62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.024. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
4
Different interventions, same outcomes? Here are four good reasons.不同的干预措施，相同的结果？这里有四个充分的理由。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;52(15):951-952. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098978. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials.理解与误解随机对照试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:2-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
6
Randomized, Controlled Trials in Health Insurance Systems.医疗保险系统中的随机对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 7;377(10):957-964. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510058.
7
Evidence for Health Decision Making - Beyond Randomized, Controlled Trials.健康决策的证据——超越随机对照试验
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):465-475. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1614394.
8
The limitations of using randomised controlled trials as a basis for developing treatment guidelines.将随机对照试验作为制定治疗指南基础的局限性。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Feb;21(1):4-6. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102701. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
9
The influence of clinical equipoise and patient preferences on outcomes of conservative manual interventions for spinal pain: an experimental study.临床 equipoise 和患者偏好对脊柱疼痛保守手法干预结果的影响：一项实验研究。 （注：equipoise 这个词在医学研究语境中可能有特定含义，具体可结合专业背景理解，这里按原样保留英文未翻译，因为它可能是医学领域特有的术语且没有完全对应的简洁中文表述）
J Pain Res. 2017 Apr 26;10:965-972. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S130931. eCollection 2017.
10
New evidence pyramid.新的证据金字塔
Evid Based Med. 2016 Aug;21(4):125-7. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Five good reasons to be disappointed with randomized trials.

作者信息

Cook Chad E, Thigpen Charles A

机构信息

a Department of Orthopaedics , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA.

b Duke MSK Group , Duke Clinical Research Institute , Durham , NC , USA.

出版信息

J Man Manip Ther. 2019 May;27(2):63-65. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1589697. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1080/10669817.2019.1589697
PMID:30935322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6484499/
Abstract
摘要