Department of Experimental Psychology, And Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Spain.
Department of Experimental Psychology, And Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Spain.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jun;129:146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
It has been proposed that attention triggered by eye-gaze may represent a unique attentional process, different from that triggered by non-social stimuli such as arrows. To investigate this issue, in the present study we compared the temporal dynamics of the conflict processing triggered by eye-gaze and arrow stimuli. We investigated the electrophysiological activity during a task in which participants were required to identify the direction of laterally presented eye-gaze or arrow targets. Opposite behavioural effects were observed: while arrows produced the typical effect, with faster responses when they were congruent with their position, eye-gaze targets produced a reversed effect with faster responses when they were incongruent. Event-related potentials showed common and dissociable congruency modulation: whereas eye-gaze and arrows showed similar effects on earlier ERP components (P1 and N1), they led to opposite effects in later components such as N2 and P3. This represents the first electrophysiological demonstration of both early shared and later dissociable congruency effects for eye-gaze and arrow stimuli.
有人提出,眼睛注视引发的注意力可能代表一种独特的注意力过程,与箭头等非社交刺激引发的注意力过程不同。为了研究这个问题,本研究比较了眼睛注视和箭头刺激引发的冲突处理的时间动态。我们在一项任务中研究了参与者在识别侧向呈现的眼睛注视或箭头目标的方向时的电生理活动。观察到了相反的行为效果:虽然箭头产生了典型的效果,即当它们与位置一致时反应更快,但眼睛注视目标产生了相反的效果,即当它们不一致时反应更快。事件相关电位显示了共同和可分离的一致性调节:虽然眼睛注视和箭头在早期 ERP 成分(P1 和 N1)上表现出相似的效果,但它们在较晚的成分(如 N2 和 P3)上产生了相反的效果。这是首次在眼动和箭头刺激的早期共享和后期可分离的一致性效应方面进行的电生理证明。