• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

箭头与眼注视空间一致效应中,显性与隐性空间加工。

Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja, s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2023 Feb;87(1):242-259. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01659-x. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-022-01659-x
PMID:35192045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9873763/
Abstract

Arrows and gaze stimuli lead to opposite spatial congruency effects. While standard congruency effects are observed for arrows (faster responses for congruent conditions), responses are faster when eye-gaze stimuli are presented on the opposite side of the gazed-at location (incongruent trials), leading to a reversed congruency effect (RCE). Here, we explored the effects of implicit vs. explicit processing of arrows and eye-gaze direction. Participants were required to identify the direction (explicit task) or the colour (implicit task) of left or right looking/pointing gaze or arrows, presented to either the left or right of the fixation point. When participants responded to the direction of stimuli, standard congruency effects for arrows and RCE for eye-gaze stimuli were observed. However, when participants responded to the colour of stimuli, no congruency effects were observed. These results suggest that it is necessary to explicitly pay attention to the direction of eye-gaze and arrows for the congruency effect to occur. The same pattern of data was observed when participants responded either manually or verbally, demonstrating that manual motor components are not responsible for the results observed. These findings are not consistent with some hypotheses previously proposed to explain the RCE observed with eye-gaze stimuli and, therefore, call for an alternative plausible hypothesis.

摘要

箭头和注视刺激导致相反的空间一致效应。虽然标准的一致性效应在箭头中观察到(在一致条件下反应更快),但当眼动注视刺激出现在注视位置的相反侧时(不一致的试验),反应更快,导致反转一致性效应(RCE)。在这里,我们探讨了箭头和眼动方向的内隐和外显处理的影响。要求参与者识别左或右看/指的注视或箭头的方向(外显任务)或颜色(内隐任务),呈现于注视点的左侧或右侧。当参与者对刺激的方向做出反应时,观察到箭头的标准一致性效应和眼动刺激的 RCE。然而,当参与者对刺激的颜色做出反应时,没有观察到一致性效应。这些结果表明,必须明确注意眼动和箭头的方向,才能产生一致性效应。当参与者以手动或口头方式做出反应时,观察到相同的数据模式,这表明手动运动成分不是观察到的结果的原因。这些发现与以前提出的一些假设不一致,这些假设用于解释眼动刺激观察到的 RCE,因此需要一个替代的合理假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/9873763/e6e6139dfc29/426_2022_1659_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/9873763/3ce95756c491/426_2022_1659_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/9873763/a544f3363a2e/426_2022_1659_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/9873763/57aeb4fabfe8/426_2022_1659_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/9873763/e6e6139dfc29/426_2022_1659_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/9873763/3ce95756c491/426_2022_1659_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/9873763/a544f3363a2e/426_2022_1659_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/9873763/57aeb4fabfe8/426_2022_1659_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa2/9873763/e6e6139dfc29/426_2022_1659_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects.箭头与眼注视空间一致效应中,显性与隐性空间加工。
Psychol Res. 2023 Feb;87(1):242-259. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01659-x. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Are eyes special? Gaze, but not pointing gestures, elicits a reversed congruency effect in a spatial Stroop task.眼睛很特殊吗?在空间斯特鲁普任务中,凝视而非指向手势会引起相反的一致性效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Nov;85(8):2547-2552. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02774-6. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
3
Target-background segregation in a spatial interference paradigm reveals shared and specific attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows.在空间干扰范式中,目标-背景分离揭示了由注视和箭头触发的共享和特定的注意机制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Nov;47(11):1561-1573. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000953.
4
What gaze adds to arrows: Changes in attentional response to gaze versus arrows in childhood and adolescence.目光所及之处:儿童和青少年时期对目光和箭头的注意力反应变化。
Br J Psychol. 2022 Aug;113(3):718-738. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12552. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
5
Gaze elicits social and nonsocial attentional orienting: An interplay of shared and unique conflict processing mechanisms.注视引发社会和非社会注意定向:共享和独特冲突处理机制的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Aug;48(8):824-841. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001015. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
6
Automatic attentional orienting to other people's gaze in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者对他人目光的自动注意定向
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1549-1558. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1192658. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
7
Neural basis of social attention: common and distinct mechanisms for social and nonsocial orienting stimuli.社会注意的神经基础:社会和非社会定向刺激的共同和独特机制。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Nov 4;33(22):11010-11024. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad339.
8
Are eyes special? Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence for a dissociation between eye-gaze and arrows attentional mechanisms.眼睛有特殊性吗?眼动和箭头注意机制分离的电生理和行为证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jun;129:146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
9
Eye gaze is not unique: The reversed congruency effect on gaze and tongue targets.目光注视并非独一无二:目光和舌头目标上的反转一致效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jul;77(7):1485-1497. doi: 10.1177/17470218231203187. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
10
Arrows don't look at you: Qualitatively different attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows.箭头不会注视你:由目光和箭头引发的性质不同的注意力机制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2254-2259. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1457-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal dynamics of activation and suppression in a spatial Stroop task: A distribution analysis on gaze and arrow targets.空间Stroop任务中激活与抑制的时间动态:关于注视和箭头目标的分布分析。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):367-383. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02993-5. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
2
Exploring the spatial interference effects elicited by social and non-social targets: A conditional accuracy function approach.探索社会和非社会目标引发的空间干扰效应:一种条件准确性函数方法。
Br J Psychol. 2025 Feb;116(1):69-88. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12735. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
3
The mechanism for the specificity of gaze direction: Inhibiting background location.

本文引用的文献

1
Gaze elicits social and nonsocial attentional orienting: An interplay of shared and unique conflict processing mechanisms.注视引发社会和非社会注意定向:共享和独特冲突处理机制的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Aug;48(8):824-841. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001015. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
What gaze adds to arrows: Changes in attentional response to gaze versus arrows in childhood and adolescence.目光所及之处:儿童和青少年时期对目光和箭头的注意力反应变化。
Br J Psychol. 2022 Aug;113(3):718-738. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12552. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Target-background segregation in a spatial interference paradigm reveals shared and specific attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows.
注视方向特异性的机制:抑制背景位置。
Iperception. 2024 Aug 12;15(4):20416695241270303. doi: 10.1177/20416695241270303. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
4
The reverse congruency effect elicited by eye-gaze as a function of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms.由目光注视引发的反向一致性效应与注意力缺陷/多动障碍症状的关系。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 14;15:1377379. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1377379. eCollection 2024.
5
Individual differences in gaze-cuing effect are associated with facial emotion recognition and social conformity.注视提示效应的个体差异与面部情绪识别和社会从众性相关。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 30;14:1219488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219488. eCollection 2023.
6
The Neurobiological Correlates of Gaze Perception in Healthy Individuals and Neurologic Patients.健康个体和神经疾病患者中注视感知的神经生物学关联
Biomedicines. 2022 Mar 9;10(3):627. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10030627.
在空间干扰范式中,目标-背景分离揭示了由注视和箭头触发的共享和特定的注意机制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Nov;47(11):1561-1573. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000953.
4
Are you looking at me? Impact of eye contact on object-based attention.你在看我吗?眼神接触对视点追踪的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Jun;47(6):765-773. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000913. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
5
Influence of global precedence on spatial Stroop effect.全局优先性对空间斯特鲁普效应的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jul;208:103116. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103116. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
Social modulators of gaze-mediated orienting of attention: A review.注视介导的注意定向的社会调节因素:综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):833-855. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01730-x.
7
Sex Differences in Attentional Selection Following Gaze and Arrow Cues.注视和箭头线索后注意选择中的性别差异。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 14;11:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00095. eCollection 2020.
8
The Loci of Stroop Interference and Facilitation Effects With Manual and Vocal Responses.手动和语音反应的斯特鲁普干扰与促进效应的位点
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 19;10:1786. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01786. eCollection 2019.
9
Joint attention facilitates observed gaze direction discrimination.共同注意有助于观察到的注视方向辨别。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jan;73(1):80-90. doi: 10.1177/1747021819867901. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
10
Perceived Gaze Direction Differentially Affects Discrimination of Facial Emotion, Attention, and Gender - An ERP Study.感知注视方向对面部表情、注意力和性别的辨别产生不同影响——一项事件相关电位研究
Front Neurosci. 2019 May 24;13:517. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00517. eCollection 2019.