• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西肥胖女性的饮食愉悦感:基于健康与体型无关方法的跨学科干预的定性报告。

Eating Pleasure in a Sample of Obese Brazilian Women: A Qualitative Report of an Interdisciplinary Intervention Based on the Health at Every Size Approach.

出版信息

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Sep;119(9):1470-1482. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.006
PMID:30940423
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Health at Every Size (HAES) is a weight-neutral approach focused on promoting healthy behaviors in people with different body sizes and on enhancing pleasure derived from consuming food to achieve sustainable healthy eating outcomes. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies in the literature assessing the effects of the HAES approach on perceptions of eating pleasure.

OBJECTIVE

We qualitatively investigated the perceptions of obese women about eating pleasure before and after a new interdisciplinary, nonprescriptive intervention based on the HAES approach.

DESIGN

The intervention was a randomized controlled clinical trial, designated as Health and Wellness in Obesity, conducted over 7 months at University of São Paulo (Brazil). We used a qualitative approach to data construction and analysis of perceptions about eating pleasure. Participants were randomized to either the intervention (I-HAES) group or the control (CTRL) group. The I-HAES group featured individual nutritional counseling, group practice of enjoyable physical activity, and philosophical workshops. The CTRL group was a traditional HAES intervention group (lecture-based model). Focus group discussions eliciting perceptions of pleasure around eating were conducted at baseline and post-study. Focus group transcripts were analyzed by exploratory content analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-three women aged 25 to 50 years with body mass index (measured in kilograms per square meter) between 30 and 39. 9 completed the intervention and the focus groups, with 32 in the I-HAES group and 11 in the CTRL group.

RESULTS

Lack of guilt about experiencing pleasure while eating and increased reflection on their own desires increased in participants of both groups after the study. The I-HAES group also displayed a greater sense of autonomy related to eating, increased pleasure in commensality, familiarity with the practice of cooking, and decreased automatic eating.

CONCLUSION

HAES-based intervention featuring nutritional counseling, appreciation for physical activity, and philosophical engagement was shown to stimulate pleasure around eating without leading to indiscriminate eating.

摘要

简介

健康体型(HAES)是一种关注不同体型人群健康行为的体重中立方法,同时增强了从食物中获得愉悦感,以实现可持续的健康饮食结果。然而,据我们所知,目前文献中尚无研究评估 HAES 方法对饮食愉悦感的影响。

目的

我们定性研究了肥胖女性在接受基于 HAES 方法的新的跨学科、非规定性干预之前和之后对饮食愉悦感的看法。

设计

该干预措施是一项在巴西圣保罗大学进行的为期 7 个月的随机对照临床试验,命名为肥胖症的健康与保健,我们采用定性方法构建和分析对饮食愉悦感的看法。参与者被随机分配到干预组(I-HAES)或对照组(CTRL)。I-HAES 组包括个体营养咨询、享受身体活动的小组实践和哲学研讨会。CTRL 组是传统的 HAES 干预组(基于讲座的模式)。在基线和研究后进行焦点小组讨论,以了解有关饮食愉悦感的看法。对焦点小组的转录进行探索性内容分析。

参与者

43 名年龄在 25 至 50 岁之间的女性,体重指数(以每平方米公斤为单位测量)在 30 至 39.9 之间,完成了干预和焦点小组,其中 32 名在 I-HAES 组,11 名在 CTRL 组。

结果

研究后,两组参与者在体验饮食愉悦感时的内疚感减少,对自身欲望的反思增加。I-HAES 组在与饮食相关的自主性方面也表现出更大的自主权,共餐的愉悦感增加,对烹饪实践的熟悉度增加,自动进食减少。

结论

以 HAES 为基础的干预措施,包括营养咨询、对身体活动的欣赏和哲学参与,被证明可以激发对饮食的愉悦感,而不会导致不加区分的饮食。

相似文献

1
Eating Pleasure in a Sample of Obese Brazilian Women: A Qualitative Report of an Interdisciplinary Intervention Based on the Health at Every Size Approach.巴西肥胖女性的饮食愉悦感:基于健康与体型无关方法的跨学科干预的定性报告。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Sep;119(9):1470-1482. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
2
Effects of a new intervention based on the Health at Every Size approach for the management of obesity: The "Health and Wellness in Obesity" study.基于健康体型方法的新干预措施对肥胖管理的影响:“肥胖中的健康与健康促进”研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0198401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198401. eCollection 2018.
3
Health-At-Every-Size and eating behaviors: 1-year follow-up results of a size acceptance intervention.健康体重理念与饮食行为:一项体型接纳干预的1年随访结果
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Nov;109(11):1854-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.08.017.
4
The design and rationale of an interdisciplinary, non-prescriptive, and Health at Every Size®-based clinical trial: The "Health and Wellness in Obesity" study.一项基于跨学科、非规定性且“无论身材,健康第一”理念的临床试验的设计与原理:“肥胖症中的健康与 Wellness”研究。
Nutr Health. 2017 Dec;23(4):261-270. doi: 10.1177/0260106017731260.
5
A Health at Every Size intervention improves intuitive eating and diet quality in Canadian women.一项“大小各有健康”干预措施改善了加拿大女性的直觉饮食和饮食质量。
Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;36(3):747-754. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
6
Eating-Related and Psychological Outcomes of Health at Every Size Intervention in Health and Social Services Centers Across the Province of Québec.魁北克省健康和社会服务中心的“每个尺寸都健康”干预措施对饮食相关和心理结果的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Feb;33(2):248-258. doi: 10.1177/0890117118786326. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
7
Is eating pleasure compatible with healthy eating? A qualitative study on Quebecers' perceptions.饮食愉悦与健康饮食兼容吗?对魁北克人的认知的定性研究。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:537-547. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.033. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
8
Short-term effects of a "health-at-every-size" approach on eating behaviors and appetite ratings.“健康体重各有不同”理念对饮食行为和食欲评分的短期影响。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Apr;15(4):957-66. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.638.
9
Effects of health at every size® interventions on health-related outcomes of people with overweight and obesity: a systematic review.健康体型®干预对超重和肥胖人群健康相关结局的影响:系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2018 Dec;19(12):1659-1666. doi: 10.1111/obr.12749. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
Impact of a Health-At-Every-Size intervention on changes in dietary intakes and eating patterns in premenopausal overweight women: results of a randomized trial.健康体型干预对绝经前超重女性饮食摄入和饮食模式变化的影响:一项随机试验的结果。
Clin Nutr. 2012 Aug;31(4):481-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Weight-neutral interventions for people with obesity and the perspective of patients, carers and healthcare professionals: a mixed methods review.肥胖人群的体重中性干预措施以及患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的观点:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 6;5(5):CD016107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016107.
2
Effects of health at every size based interventions on health-related outcomes and body mass, in a short and a long term.无论身材大小的健康干预措施在短期和长期内对健康相关结果和体重的影响。
Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 8;11:1482854. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1482854. eCollection 2024.
3
Health at Every Size®-Based Interventions May Improve Cardiometabolic Risk and Quality of Life Even in the Absence of Weight Loss: An Ancillary, Exploratory Analysis of the Health and Wellness in Obesity Study.
即使在没有体重减轻的情况下,基于“健康体重各尺码”理念的干预措施也可能改善心血管代谢风险和生活质量:肥胖研究中健康与 Wellness 的辅助性探索性分析。
Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 22;9:598920. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.598920. eCollection 2022.
4
What Is Commensality? A Critical Discussion of an Expanding Research Field.共餐是什么?对一个不断扩展的研究领域的批判性讨论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 9;18(12):6235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126235.