Suppr超能文献

根据寻求共识的情况评估膜周部室间隔缺损定义标准。

Assessing the criteria for definition of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in light of the search for consensus.

机构信息

The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Apr 3;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1044-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discussions continue as to whether ventricular septal defects are best categorized according to their right ventricular geography or their borders. This is especially true when considering the perimembranous defect. Our aim, therefore, was to establish the phenotypic feature of the perimembranous defect, and to establish the ease of distinguishing its geographical variants.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed unrepaired isolated perimembranous ventricular defects from six historic archives, subcategorizing them using the ICD-11 coding system. We identified 365 defects, of which 94 (26%) were deemed to open centrally, 168 (46%) to open to the outlet, and 84 (23%) to the inlet of the right ventricle, with 19 (5%) being confluent. In all hearts, the unifying phenotypic feature was fibrous continuity between the leaflets of the mitral and tricuspid valves. This was often directly between the valves, but in all instances incorporated continuity through the atrioventricular portion of the membranous septum. In contrast, we observed fibrous continuity between the leaflets of the tricuspid and aortic valves in only 298 (82%) of the specimens. When found, discontinuity most commonly was seen in the outlet and central defects. There were no discrepancies between evaluators in distinguishing the borders, but there was occasional disagreement in determining the right ventricular geography of the defect.

CONCLUSIONS

The unifying feature of perimembranous defects, rather than being aortic-to-tricuspid valvar fibrous continuity, is fibrous continuity between the leaflets of the atrioventricular valves. While right ventricular geography is important in classification, it is the borders which are more objectively defined.

摘要

背景

关于室间隔缺损是根据其右心室解剖位置还是边缘来分类,目前仍存在争议。尤其是对于膜周部缺损更是如此。因此,我们的目的是确定膜周部缺损的表型特征,并确定区分其地理变异的难易程度。

方法和结果

我们评估了来自六个历史档案的未修复的孤立性膜周部室间隔缺损,并使用 ICD-11 编码系统对其进行了亚分类。我们共发现 365 个缺损,其中 94 个(26%)位于中央,168 个(46%)位于流出道,84 个(23%)位于流入道,19 个(5%)为融合型。在所有心脏中,二尖瓣和三尖瓣瓣叶之间的纤维连续性是统一的表型特征。这通常是在瓣叶之间直接相连,但在所有情况下都通过膜部间隔的房室部分相连。相比之下,我们仅在 298 个(82%)标本中观察到三尖瓣和主动脉瓣叶之间的纤维连续性。当发现这种连续性时,最常见的是在流出道和中央缺损中。在区分边界时,评估者之间没有差异,但在确定缺损的右心室解剖位置时偶尔会存在分歧。

结论

膜周部缺损的统一特征不是主动脉瓣至三尖瓣瓣叶的纤维连续性,而是房室瓣叶之间的纤维连续性。虽然右心室解剖位置在分类中很重要,但边界的定义更为客观。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d8/6448229/5795839b9e84/13023_2019_1044_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验