Center for Immune-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 15;25(18):5449-5457. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1543. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
Both immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and antiangiogenesis agents have changed the landscape of cancer treatment in the modern era. While antiangiogenesis agents have demonstrated activities in tumors with high vascularization, including renal cell carcinoma and colorectal cancer, the effect of ICIs has been seen mainly in immunologically recognized tumors, with highly immune-infiltrative lymphocytes. The main challenge in the drug development of ICIs is moving their activities to noninflamed tumors and overcoming resistance that is driven, in part, by the immune-suppressive microenvironment. Angiogenesis factors drive immune suppression by directly suppressing the antigen-presenting cells as well as immune effector cells or through augmenting the effect of regulatory T cells (Treg), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM). Those suppressive immune cells can also drive angiogenesis, creating a vicious cycle of impaired immune activation. The combination of bevacizumab and ipilimumab was the first to show the promising effect of antiangiogenesis and ICIs. A plethora of similar combinations has entered the clinic since then, confirming the promising effects of such approach.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和抗血管生成药物在现代都改变了癌症治疗的格局。抗血管生成药物在血管化程度高的肿瘤中显示出活性,包括肾细胞癌和结直肠癌,而 ICI 的作用主要见于免疫识别的肿瘤中,这些肿瘤中有高度浸润的淋巴细胞。ICI 药物开发的主要挑战是将其活性转移到非炎症肿瘤中,并克服耐药性,部分耐药性是由免疫抑制微环境驱动的。血管生成因子通过直接抑制抗原呈递细胞以及免疫效应细胞,或通过增强调节性 T 细胞(Treg)、髓系来源的抑制细胞(MDSC)和肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAM)的作用来驱动免疫抑制。这些抑制性免疫细胞也可以驱动血管生成,形成一个免疫激活受损的恶性循环。贝伐珠单抗和伊匹单抗的联合是第一个显示出抗血管生成和 ICI 有前景的疗效的联合。此后,大量类似的联合药物进入临床,证实了这种方法的前景。