• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注视方向对食物偏好的影响。

The influence of gaze direction on food preferences.

机构信息

Institute for Psychology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.

Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Neuroscience Research Center, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 3;9(1):5604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41815-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-41815-9
PMID:30944355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6447626/
Abstract

In our information-rich environment, the gaze direction of another indicates their current focus of attention. Following the gaze of another, results in gaze-evoked shifts in joint attention, a phenomenon critical for the functioning of social cognition. Previous research in joint attention has shown that objects that are attended by another are more liked than ignored objects. Here, we investigated this effect of gaze-cueing on participants' preferences for unknown food items. Participants provided their willingness to pay (WTP), taste and health preferences for food items before and after a standard gaze-cueing paradigm. We observed a significant effect of gaze-cueing on participants' WTP bids. Specifically, participants were willing to pay more money for the food items that were looked at by another person. In contrast, there was a decrease in preference for the food items that were ignored by another person. Interestingly, this increase in WTP occurred without participants' awareness of the contingency between the cue and target. These results highlight the influence of social information on human choice behavior and lay the foundation for experiments in neuromarketing and consumer decision making.

摘要

在信息丰富的环境中,他人的目光方向表示他们当前的注意力焦点。跟随他人的目光会导致共同注意的目光诱发转移,这是社会认知功能的关键现象。先前关于共同注意的研究表明,被他人关注的物体比被忽视的物体更受欢迎。在这里,我们研究了这种注视提示对参与者对未知食物偏好的影响。在标准的注视提示范式之前和之后,参与者提供了他们对食物的支付意愿 (WTP)、味觉和健康偏好。我们观察到注视提示对参与者的 WTP 出价有显著影响。具体来说,参与者愿意为被另一个人注视的食物支付更多的钱。相比之下,对于被另一个人忽视的食物,参与者的偏好则下降。有趣的是,这种 WTP 的增加是在参与者没有意识到线索和目标之间的关联的情况下发生的。这些结果强调了社会信息对人类选择行为的影响,为神经营销和消费者决策制定实验奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/b5504023c806/41598_2019_41815_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/047e8416ccaa/41598_2019_41815_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/3c5c35088c34/41598_2019_41815_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/f364448590c2/41598_2019_41815_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/4590e61c730e/41598_2019_41815_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/ad2ad255b2ad/41598_2019_41815_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/b5504023c806/41598_2019_41815_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/047e8416ccaa/41598_2019_41815_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/3c5c35088c34/41598_2019_41815_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/f364448590c2/41598_2019_41815_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/4590e61c730e/41598_2019_41815_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/ad2ad255b2ad/41598_2019_41815_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/382b/6447626/b5504023c806/41598_2019_41815_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of gaze direction on food preferences.注视方向对食物偏好的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 3;9(1):5604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41815-9.
2
Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.注意力的注视提示:视觉注意力、社会认知与个体差异
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):694-724. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694.
3
When seeing is more than looking: Intentional gaze modulates object desirability.当看不仅仅是看时:有意的注视会调节物体的吸引力。
Emotion. 2014 Aug;14(4):824-32. doi: 10.1037/a0036258. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
4
Neural Correlates Underlying Social-Cue-Induced Value Change.社会线索诱导价值变化的神经相关因素。
J Neurosci. 2022 Aug 10;42(32):6276-6284. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2405-21.2022. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
5
A direct link between gaze perception and social attention.目光感知与社会注意力之间的直接联系。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Jun;37(3):634-44. doi: 10.1037/a0020559.
6
Complementary effects of gaze direction and early saliency in guiding fixations during free viewing.自由观看过程中注视方向和早期显著性在引导注视方面的互补作用。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 4;14(13):3. doi: 10.1167/14.13.3.
7
Emotion Unchained: Facial Expression Modulates Gaze Cueing under Cognitive Load.情感解放:面部表情在认知负荷下调节注视提示
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 13;11(12):e0168111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168111. eCollection 2016.
8
The appeal of the devil's eye: social evaluation affects social attention.恶魔之眼的吸引力:社会评价影响社会注意力。
Cogn Process. 2017 Feb;18(1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0785-2. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
9
Only your eyes tell me what you like: Exploring the liking effect induced by other's gaze.唯有你的双眼告诉我你之所好:探究他人目光引发的喜好效应。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(3):460-70. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.919899. Epub 2014 May 23.
10
Eye gaze triggers reflexive attention shifts: evidence from lateralised ERPs.目光注视引发反射性注意力转移:来自偏侧化事件相关电位的证据。
Brain Res. 2014 Nov 17;1589:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.029. Epub 2014 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
How to nudge students toward healthier snacks? Consumer neuroscience insights on multisensory nudge interventions in university vending machines.如何引导学生选择更健康的零食?关于大学自动售货机中多感官引导干预的消费者神经科学见解。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0325804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325804. eCollection 2025.
2
Neural Correlates Underlying Social-Cue-Induced Value Change.社会线索诱导价值变化的神经相关因素。
J Neurosci. 2022 Aug 10;42(32):6276-6284. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2405-21.2022. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
3
EEG alpha and theta signatures of socially and non-socially cued working memory in virtual reality.

本文引用的文献

1
Subliminal gaze cues increase preference levels for items in the gaze direction.阈下注视线索会提高对注视方向上物品的偏好程度。
Cogn Emot. 2018 Aug;32(5):1146-1151. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1371002. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
2
Making eye contact without awareness.无意识地进行眼神交流。
Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
3
Approach avoidance training in the eating domain: testing the effectiveness across three single session studies.进食领域的趋近回避训练:三项单次治疗研究检验其效果。
脑电图α和θ节律在虚拟现实中社会和非社会线索工作记忆的特征。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):531-540. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab123.
4
Neurogastronomy as a Tool for Evaluating Emotions and Visual Preferences of Selected Food Served in Different Ways.神经美食学作为一种评估以不同方式提供的特定食物的情感和视觉偏好的工具。
Foods. 2021 Feb 7;10(2):354. doi: 10.3390/foods10020354.
5
Incidental learning of group trust: Predictive gaze cue matters.偶然学习群体信任:预测性注视线索很重要。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 8;10(1):7789. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64719-5.
Appetite. 2015 Feb;85:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.11.017. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
4
Behavioral and neural valuation of foods is driven by implicit knowledge of caloric content.食物的行为和神经评估是由对卡路里含量的隐性知识驱动的。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2168-76. doi: 10.1177/0956797614552081. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
5
Only your eyes tell me what you like: Exploring the liking effect induced by other's gaze.唯有你的双眼告诉我你之所好:探究他人目光引发的喜好效应。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(3):460-70. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.919899. Epub 2014 May 23.
6
Changing value through cued approach: an automatic mechanism of behavior change.通过提示引导改变价值:行为改变的自动机制。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Apr;17(4):625-30. doi: 10.1038/nn.3673. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
7
Focusing attention on the health aspects of foods changes value signals in vmPFC and improves dietary choice.关注食物的健康方面会改变 vmPFC 中的价值信号,从而改善饮食选择。
J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 27;31(30):11077-87. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6383-10.2011.
8
Gaze cueing elicited by emotional faces is influenced by affective context.由情绪化面孔引发的注视线索受情感背景的影响。
Vis cogn. 2010 Sep;18(8):1214-1232. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2010.484657. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
9
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.视觉注视与简单选择中的价值计算和比较。
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Oct;13(10):1292-8. doi: 10.1038/nn.2635. Epub 2010 Sep 12.
10
Evidence for a common representation of decision values for dissimilar goods in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex.人类腹内侧前额叶皮层中不同商品决策价值存在共同表征的证据。
J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 30;29(39):12315-20. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2575-09.2009.