Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.
Ecol Appl. 2019 Jun;29(4):e01882. doi: 10.1002/eap.1882. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
Most assessments of the effectiveness of river restoration are done at small spatial scales (<10 km) over short time frames (less than three years), potentially failing to capture large-scale mechanisms such as completion of life-history processes, changes to system productivity, or time lags of ecosystem responses. To test the hypothesis that populations of two species of large-bodied, piscivorous, native fishes would increase in response to large-scale structural habitat restoration (reintroduction of 4,450 pieces of coarse woody habitat into a 110-km reach of the Murray River, southeastern Australia), we collected annual catch, effort, length, and tagging data over seven years for Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii) and golden perch (Macquaria ambigua) in a restored "intervention" reach and three neighboring "control" reaches. We supplemented mark-recapture data with telemetry and angler phone-in data to assess the potentially confounding influences of movement among sampled populations, heterogeneous detection rates, and population vital rates. We applied a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate changes in population parameters including immigration, emigration, and mortality rates. For Murray cod, we observed a threefold increase in abundance in the population within the intervention reach, while populations declined or fluctuated within the control reaches. Golden perch densities also increased twofold in the intervention reach. Our results indicate that restoring habitat heterogeneity by adding coarse woody habitats can increase the abundance of fish at a population scale in a large, lowland river. Successful restoration of poor-quality "sink" habitats for target species relies on connectivity with high-quality "source" habitats. We recommend that the analysis of restoration success across appropriately large spatial and temporal scales can help identify mechanisms and success rates of other restoration strategies such as restoring fish passage or delivering water for environmental outcomes.
大多数对河流恢复有效性的评估都是在小空间尺度(<10 公里)和短时间框架内(少于三年)进行的,可能无法捕捉到大尺度机制,如完成生命史过程、系统生产力的变化或生态系统响应的时滞。为了检验以下假设,即两种大型、肉食性、本地鱼类的种群数量将响应大规模结构栖息地恢复(在澳大利亚东南部墨累河 110 公里长的河段重新引入 4450 块粗木质生境)而增加,我们在恢复的“干预”河段和三个相邻的“对照”河段收集了 7 年的年度捕捞量、工作量、长度和标记数据,用于墨累鳕鱼(Maccullochella peelii)和金鲈(Macquaria ambigua)。我们利用遥测和钓鱼者电话数据补充标记重捕数据,以评估在抽样种群之间的移动、异质检测率和种群生命率的潜在混杂影响。我们应用贝叶斯层次模型来估计包括移民、迁出和死亡率在内的种群参数的变化。对于墨累鳕鱼,我们观察到干预河段内种群数量增加了三倍,而对照河段内的种群数量下降或波动。干预河段内的金鲈密度也增加了两倍。我们的结果表明,通过添加粗木质生境来恢复栖息地异质性可以增加大型低地河流中鱼类种群的丰度。为目标物种恢复劣质“汇”栖息地的成功取决于与高质量“源”栖息地的连通性。我们建议,在适当的大空间和时间尺度上分析恢复成功可以帮助确定其他恢复策略(如恢复鱼类通道或提供水以实现环境目标)的机制和成功率。