George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering , Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering , Clarkson University , Potsdam , New York 13699 , United States.
Chem Rev. 2019 Apr 24;119(8):5416-5460. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00642. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
This comprehensive Review focuses on the key challenges and recent progress regarding sodium-metal anodes employed in sodium-metal batteries (SMBs). The metal anode is the essential component of emerging energy storage systems such as sodium sulfur and sodium selenium, which are discussed as example full-cell applications. We begin with a description of the differences in the chemical and physical properties of Na metal versus the oft-studied Li metal, and a corresponding discussion regarding the number of ways in which Na does not follow Li-inherited paradigms in its electrochemical behavior. We detail the major challenges for Na-metal systems that at this time limit the feasibility of SMBs. The core Na anode problems are the following interrelated degradation mechanisms: An unstable solid electrolyte interphase with most organic electrolytes, "mossy" and "lath-like" metal dendrite growth for liquid systems, poor Coulombic efficiency, and gas evolution. Even solid-state Na batteries are not immune, with metal dendrites being reported. The solutions may be subdivided into the following interrelated taxonomy: Improved electrolytes and electrolyte additives tailored for Na-metal anodes, interfacial engineering between the metal and the liquid or solid electrolyte, electrode architectures that both reduce the current density during plating-stripping and serve as effective hosts that shield the Na metal from excessive reactions, and alloy design to tune the bulk properties of the metal per se. For instance, stable plating-stripping of Na is extremely difficult with conventional carbonate solvents but has been reported with ethers and glymes. Solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) such as beta-alumina solid electrolyte (BASE), sodium superionic conductor (NASICON), and sodium thiophosphate (75NaS·25PS) present highly exciting opportunities for SMBs that avoid the dangers of flammable liquids. Even SSEs are not immune to dendrites, however, which grow through the defects in the bulk pellet, but may be controlled through interfacial energy modification. We conclude with a discussion of the key research areas that we feel are the most fruitful for further pursuit. In our opinion, greatly improved understanding and control of the SEI structure is the key to cycling stability. A holistic approach involving complementary post-mortem, in situ, and operando analyses to elucidate full battery cell level structure-performance relations is advocated.
这篇全面的综述聚焦于在用于钠金属电池(SMB)的钠金属阳极所面临的关键挑战和最新进展。金属阳极是新兴储能系统(如钠硫和钠硒电池)的重要组成部分,我们将其作为全电池应用的示例进行了讨论。我们首先描述了钠金属与经常研究的锂金属在化学和物理性质上的差异,并相应地讨论了钠在电化学行为方面不遵循锂所遵循的模式的多种方式。我们详细介绍了限制 SMB 可行性的钠金属系统的主要挑战。核心的钠阳极问题包括以下相互关联的降解机制:与大多数有机电解质不兼容的不稳定固体电解质界面相、液态系统中“苔藓状”和“条状”金属枝晶生长、差的库仑效率和气体析出。即使是固态钠电池也不能幸免,据报道存在金属枝晶。解决方案可以分为以下相互关联的分类:为钠金属阳极定制的改进电解质和电解质添加剂、金属与液态或固态电解质之间的界面工程、既能降低电镀-剥离过程中的电流密度,又能作为有效宿主来屏蔽钠金属免受过度反应的电极结构,以及合金设计来调整金属本身的体性质。例如,在传统的碳酸盐溶剂中,钠的稳定电镀-剥离极其困难,但在醚类和甘醇类溶剂中已有报道。β-氧化铝固体电解质(BASE)、钠离子超导体(NASICON)和硫代磷酸钠(75NaS·25PS)等固态电解质(SSE)为 SMB 提供了极具吸引力的机会,可以避免易燃液体的危险。然而,即使是 SSE 也不能幸免枝晶的问题,枝晶会穿过体颗粒的缺陷生长,但可以通过界面能的修饰来控制。最后,我们讨论了我们认为最有前途的关键研究领域。在我们看来,大大提高对 SEI 结构的理解和控制是循环稳定性的关键。我们提倡采用互补的事后分析、原位分析和操作分析的整体方法来阐明全电池级别的结构-性能关系。