• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗老年高血压患者的目标血压水平:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Target blood pressure level for the treatment of elderly hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

机构信息

Department of Geriatric and General Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2019 May;42(5):660-668. doi: 10.1038/s41440-019-0227-5. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1038/s41440-019-0227-5
PMID:30948832
Abstract

Although recent systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) support the benefit of blood pressure (BP) treatment in the elderly, the optimized target BP level remains controversial. We performed a SR to determine the clinical benefit of antihypertensive treatments with a target systolic BP (SBP) of <140 mmHg in the elderly. We searched for RCTs comparing intensive and less intensive treatments or placebo and active treatments reported until May 2017 and identified 11 RCTs in which the target or on-treatment SBP in the intensive or active treatment was less than 140 mmHg. Among the RCTs, 6 RCTs with primary or subanalysis results for patients aged 70 years or older were finally chosen for the meta-analysis. We found that intensive lowering of BP did not reduce the risk ratio (RR) of composite cardiovascular outcomes (95% CI: 0.67-1.05, p = 0.13). By contrast, intensive lowering of BP achieved RR reductions of 24% for all-cause death (0.63-0.92) and of 39% for cardiovascular death (0.48-0.77). Intensive lowering of BP did not alter the incidence of stroke (0.63-1.23) and serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.93-1.09). In conclusion, intensive antihypertensive regimens targeting SBP < 140 mmHg did not significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases compared to that of less intensive treatments, but did reduce the risk of death without increasing adverse events in patients aged 70 years or older. These findings support the benefit of intensive treatment targeting SBP to ≤140 mmHg in the elderly.

摘要

尽管最近的系统评价(SRs)支持对老年人进行血压(BP)治疗,但优化的目标 BP 水平仍存在争议。我们进行了一项 SR,以确定将收缩压(SBP)目标设定为<140mmHg 的降压治疗的临床益处。我们检索了比较强化和非强化治疗或安慰剂和活性治疗的 RCTs,直至 2017 年 5 月,并确定了 11 项将强化或活性治疗的目标或治疗中的 SBP 设定为<140mmHg 的 RCT。在这些 RCT 中,最终选择了 6 项具有 70 岁或以上患者的主要或亚分析结果的 RCT 进行荟萃分析。我们发现,强化降压并不能降低复合心血管结局的风险比(RR)(95%CI:0.67-1.05,p=0.13)。相比之下,强化降压可使全因死亡的 RR 降低 24%(0.63-0.92)和心血管死亡的 RR 降低 39%(0.48-0.77)。强化降压不会改变中风(0.63-1.23)和严重不良事件(SAEs)(0.93-1.09)的发生率。总之,与非强化治疗相比,目标 SBP<140mmHg 的强化降压方案并不能显著降低心血管疾病的风险,但可降低 70 岁及以上患者的死亡风险,而不会增加不良事件。这些发现支持将 SBP 目标设定为≤140mmHg 的强化治疗对老年人的益处。

相似文献

1
Target blood pressure level for the treatment of elderly hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.治疗老年高血压患者的目标血压水平:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2019 May;42(5):660-668. doi: 10.1038/s41440-019-0227-5. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
2
Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality: 13 - benefits and adverse events in older and younger patients with hypertension: overview, meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses of randomized trials.降压治疗对心血管结局和死亡率的影响:13 - 老年和年轻高血压患者的获益和不良反应:随机试验的概述、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。
J Hypertens. 2018 Aug;36(8):1622-1636. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001787.
3
Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 2. Effects at different baseline and achieved blood pressure levels--overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.血压降低对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:2. 不同基线血压和血压控制水平的影响——随机试验的概述与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2014 Dec;32(12):2296-304. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000379.
4
Effects of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on outcome incidence in hypertension: 10 - Should blood pressure management differ in hypertensive patients with and without diabetes mellitus? Overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.降压治疗对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:10 - 糖尿病合并与未合并高血压患者的血压管理是否应有所不同?随机试验的综述与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2017 May;35(5):922-944. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001276.
5
Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension. 1. Overview, meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses of randomized trials.血压降低对高血压患者结局发生率的影响。1. 随机试验的概述、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。
J Hypertens. 2014 Dec;32(12):2285-95. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000378.
6
Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 7. Effects of more vs. less intensive blood pressure lowering and different achieved blood pressure levels - updated overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.血压降低对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:7. 强化与非强化血压降低及不同血压达标水平的影响——随机试验的最新综述与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2016 Apr;34(4):613-22. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000881.
7
Effects of blood pressure lowering treatment in hypertension: 8. Outcome reductions vs. discontinuations because of adverse drug events - meta-analyses of randomized trials.高血压降压治疗的效果:8. 不良药物事件导致的结局降低与停药情况——随机试验的荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2016 Aug;34(8):1451-63. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000972.
8
Effects of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on outcome incidence in hypertension. 11. Effects of total cardiovascular risk and achieved blood pressure: overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.降压治疗对高血压患者结局发生率的影响。11. 总体心血管风险及血压控制情况的影响:随机试验的概述与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2017 Nov;35(11):2138-2149. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001548.
9
Treatment of Hypertension: Which Goal for Which Patient?高血压的治疗:针对不同患者应设定何种目标?
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;956:117-127. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_97.
10
Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 3. Effects in patients at different levels of cardiovascular risk--overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.血压降低对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:3. 对不同心血管风险水平患者的影响——随机试验的概述与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2014 Dec;32(12):2305-14. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000380.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeting a systolic blood pressure of <130 mmHg is beneficial in adults with hypertension aged ≥75 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.将收缩压目标设定为<130 mmHg对年龄≥75岁的高血压成人有益:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02302-z.
2
Update of the clinical guideline for hypertension diagnosis and treatment in Iran.伊朗高血压诊断与治疗临床指南的更新
Clin Hypertens. 2024 Jun 1;30(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40885-024-00269-6.
3
Current Management of Hypertension in Older Adults.老年人高血压的现行管理。
Drugs Aging. 2023 May;40(5):407-416. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01013-9. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
4
Time to Clinical Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients 60 Years and Older With Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.60 岁及以上高血压患者强化降压的临床获益时间:随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jun 1;182(6):660-667. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1657.
5
Numbers and Mortality Risk of Hypertensive Patients with or without Elevated Body Mass Index in China.中国高血压患者中,无论是否超重,其人数与死亡风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010116.
6
Effects of renal denervation on blood pressures in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials.肾去神经术对高血压患者血压的影响:随机假手术对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2022 Feb;45(2):210-220. doi: 10.1038/s41440-021-00761-8. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
7
Clinical studies on pharmacological treatment of hypertension in Japan.日本高血压药物治疗的临床研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2024 Jun;38(6):486-499. doi: 10.1038/s41371-021-00533-4. Epub 2021 May 7.
8
Blood pressure control in older adults with hypertension: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.老年高血压患者的血压控制:一项包含荟萃分析和荟萃回归的系统评价
Int J Cardiol Hypertens. 2020 Jul 7;6:100040. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100040. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Highlights of the 2019 Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines and perspectives on the management of Asian hypertensive patients.2019 年日本高血压学会指南要点及亚洲高血压患者管理的观点。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Mar;22(3):369-377. doi: 10.1111/jch.13763. Epub 2019 Dec 31.