• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子期刊征稿启事。

Solicitation for article submission by electronic journals.

作者信息

Ball Somedeb, Kopel Jonathan, Alexander Robert, Nugent Kenneth

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences CenterLubbockTexas.

出版信息

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018 Sep 24;31(4):443-446. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2018.1498725. eCollection 2018 Oct.

DOI:10.1080/08998280.2018.1498725
PMID:30948976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6413993/
Abstract

The business model, editorial policies, and content quality vary significantly in online medical journals. Some online journals have been labeled as journals because their main effort involves collecting article processing charges with little interest in content, peer review, or manuscript presentation. Some of these journals send frequent email solicitations for submissions. One author affiliated with a department of internal medicine collected all email requests for submissions to online journals over a 6-month period. These emails included 210 unique journal names that covered over 40 medical fields and requested 15 different article types. Most of these journals were not listed in PubMed or the Directory of Open Access Journals. One hundred and eighty two were on Beall's list of predatory journals. The median article processing charge was $1035. Faculty and trainees at medical schools receive multiple requests for submissions, but it is difficult to determine the quality of the journal sending these requests. At a minimum, a journal should be listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals and have very clear editorial and publication policies.

摘要

在线医学期刊的商业模式、编辑政策和内容质量差异很大。一些在线期刊被贴上“掠夺性”期刊的标签,因为它们主要致力于收取文章处理费,而对内容、同行评审或稿件呈现几乎没有兴趣。其中一些期刊频繁发送投稿邀请电子邮件。一位内科部门的作者收集了6个月内所有向在线期刊发送的投稿电子邮件请求。这些电子邮件包含210个不同的期刊名称,涵盖40多个医学领域,并要求提交15种不同类型的文章。这些期刊大多未被列入PubMed或开放获取期刊目录。其中182种在Beall的掠夺性期刊名单上。文章处理费的中位数为1035美元。医学院的教职员工和实习生会收到多次投稿请求,但很难确定发送这些请求的期刊的质量。至少,一本期刊应该被列入开放获取期刊目录,并有非常明确的编辑和出版政策。

相似文献

1
Solicitation for article submission by electronic journals.电子期刊征稿启事。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018 Sep 24;31(4):443-446. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2018.1498725. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research.骨科学术研究中的掠夺性出版。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):e138. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01569.
3
"Dear Doctor, greetings of the day!": A 1-year observational study of presumed predatory journal invitations.“尊敬的医生,您好!”:一项针对掠夺性期刊邀请的为期 1 年的观察性研究。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Jul 3;24(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00471-6.
4
An Analysis of Solicitations From Predatory Journals in Ophthalmology.眼科领域掠夺性期刊征稿情况分析
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;264:216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.02.030. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.潜在的掠夺性和正规生物医学期刊:你能区分出来吗?一项横断面比较。
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 16;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9.
6
Rate of publication in predatory journals by orthopedic surgeons members of the French orthopedic and traumatology society (SOFCOT): A follow-up note.法国矫形外科学会(SOFCOT)成员在掠夺性期刊上的发表率:后续说明。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Dec;106(8):1457-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.03.042. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
7
Awareness of "Predatory" Open-Access Journals among Prospective Veterinary and Medical Authors Attending Scientific Writing Workshops.参加科研写作工作坊的兽医和医学作者对“掠夺性”开放获取期刊的认知。
Front Vet Sci. 2015 Aug 13;2:22. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00022. eCollection 2015.
8
Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation.康复领域的掠夺性开放获取
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):1051-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
9
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
10
An analysis of invitations for article submission received via emails.电子邮件邀请投稿的分析。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2022 Apr-Jun;VII(2):103-107. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2021.060. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Predatory journals- Can we stem the rot?掠夺性期刊——我们能阻止这种不良趋势吗?
J Postgrad Med. 2019 Jul-Sep;65(3):129-131. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_266_19.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006-2017.学术综合类大期刊的演变,2006 - 2017年
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 9;6:e4357. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4357. eCollection 2018.
2
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.潜在的掠夺性和正规生物医学期刊:你能区分出来吗?一项横断面比较。
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 16;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9.
3
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
4
Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact.开放获取期刊与订阅期刊:科学影响力比较。
BMC Med. 2012 Jul 17;10:73. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73.
5
Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.作为期刊评价工具的文献计量分析
Science. 1972 Nov 3;178(4060):471-9. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4060.471.