Suppr超能文献

东道国对叙利亚难民中非传染性疾病的应对措施:一项综述。

Host country responses to non-communicable diseases amongst Syrian refugees: a review.

作者信息

Akik Chaza, Ghattas Hala, Mesmar Sandra, Rabkin Miriam, El-Sadr Wafaa M, Fouad Fouad M

机构信息

1Center for Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

2ICAP, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA.

出版信息

Confl Health. 2019 Mar 22;13:8. doi: 10.1186/s13031-019-0192-2. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the beginning of the Syrian conflict in 2011, Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey have hosted large refugee populations, with a high pre-conflict burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe the ways in which these three host country health systems have provided NCD services to Syrian refugees over time, and to highlight the successes and challenges they encountered.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive review of the academic and grey literature, published between March 2011 and March 2017, using PubMed and Google searches complemented with documents provided by relevant stakeholders.

RESULTS

Forty-one articles and reports met our search criteria. Despite the scarcity of systematic population-level data, these documents highlight the high burden of reported NCDs among Syrian refugees, especially amongst older adults. The three host countries utilized different approaches to the design, delivery and financing of NCD services for these refugees. In Jordan and Lebanon, Ministries of Health and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) coordinate a diverse group of health care providers to deliver health services to Syrian refugees at a subsidized cost. In Turkey, however, services are provided solely by the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD), a Turkish governmental agency, with no cost to patients for primary or secondary care. Access to NCD services varied both within and between countries, with no data available from Turkey. The cost of NCD treatment is the primary barrier to accessing healthcare, with high out-of-pocket payments required for medications and secondary and tertiary care services, despite the availability of free or subsidized primary health services. Financial impediments led refugees to adopt coping strategies, including returning to Syria to seek treatment, with associated frequent treatment interruptions. These gaps were compounded by health system related barriers such as complex referral systems, lack of effective guidance on navigating the health system, limited health facility capacity and suboptimal NCD health education.

CONCLUSION

As funding shortages for refugee services continue, innovative service delivery models are needed to create responsive and sustainable solutions to the NCD burden among refugees in host countries.

摘要

背景

自2011年叙利亚冲突爆发以来,约旦、黎巴嫩和土耳其接纳了大量难民,这些国家在冲突前就面临着较高的非传染性疾病负担。

目的

我们旨在描述这三个东道国卫生系统随着时间推移为叙利亚难民提供非传染性疾病服务的方式,并突出它们所取得的成功和遇到的挑战。

方法

我们对2011年3月至2017年3月期间发表的学术文献和灰色文献进行了描述性综述,利用PubMed和谷歌搜索,并辅以相关利益攸关方提供的文件。

结果

41篇文章和报告符合我们的搜索标准。尽管缺乏系统的人群层面数据,但这些文件突出了叙利亚难民中报告的非传染性疾病负担较高,尤其是在老年人中。这三个东道国对为难民提供的非传染性疾病服务的设计、提供和融资采用了不同的方法。在约旦和黎巴嫩,卫生部和联合国难民事务高级专员公署(难民署)协调了一批不同的医疗服务提供者,以补贴成本为叙利亚难民提供医疗服务。然而,在土耳其,服务仅由土耳其政府机构灾害和应急管理局(AFAD)提供,初级或二级医疗对患者免费。各国国内和国家之间获得非传染性疾病服务的情况各不相同,土耳其没有相关数据。非传染性疾病治疗费用是获得医疗保健的主要障碍,尽管有免费或补贴的初级卫生服务,但药物以及二级和三级医疗服务仍需要高额自付费用。经济障碍导致难民采取应对策略,包括返回叙利亚寻求治疗,这常常导致治疗中断。这些差距因卫生系统相关障碍而更加严重,如复杂的转诊系统、缺乏关于如何在卫生系统中就医的有效指导、卫生设施能力有限以及非传染性疾病健康教育不足。

结论

随着难民服务资金短缺问题持续存在,需要创新的服务提供模式,以制定应对东道国难民非传染性疾病负担的灵活且可持续的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf63/6431037/303b336a3952/13031_2019_192_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验