Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Jena, Germany.
Paris Est University, Animal Health Laboratory, EU-Reference Laboratory for Glanders, Maisons Alfort Cedex, France.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 5;14(4):e0214963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214963. eCollection 2019.
Glanders is a zoonotic contagious disease of equids caused by Burkholderia (B.) mallei. Serodiagnosis of the disease is challenging because of false-positive and false-negative test results. The accuracy of the complement fixation test (CFT) which is prescribed for international trade by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), five ELISAs and a Western blot (WB) were compared for serodiagnosis of glanders using sera from 3,000 glanders-free and 254 glanderous equids. Four ELISA tests are based on recombinant antigens (TssA, TssB, BimA and Hcp1), the IDVet ELISA is based on a semi-purified fraction of B. mallei and WB makes use of a purified LPS-containing B. mallei-antigen. Sensitivity and specificity of tests were estimated using cut-off values recommended by the test developers. The WB and all ELISAs, except BimA, were significantly more specific than the CFT. ELISAs based on TssA, TssB, and BimA antigens had significantly lower sensitivity compared to CFT while the sensitivities of the Hcp1-ELISA, the IDVet-ELISA and the WB did not differ significantly from that of the CFT. Given their comparable sensitivities and specificities, the CFT (98.0%, 96.4%), the WB (96.8%, 99.4%), the Hcp1-ELISA (95.3%, 99.6%) and the IDVet-ELISA (92.5%, 99.5%) should be further developed to meet OIE requirements.
类鼻疽是一种由鼻疽伯克霍尔德菌(B. mallei)引起的马属动物人畜共患传染病。由于假阳性和假阴性的检测结果,该病的血清学诊断具有挑战性。本研究比较了国际动物卫生组织(OIE)规定用于贸易的补体结合试验(CFT)、5 种 ELISA 和 Western blot(WB)在 3000 份无类鼻疽马属动物血清和 254 份类鼻疽马属动物血清中的血清学诊断价值。四种 ELISA 试验基于重组抗原(TssA、TssB、BimA 和 Hcp1),IDVet ELISA 基于半纯化的鼻疽伯克霍尔德菌片段,WB 则利用纯化的含脂多糖的鼻疽伯克霍尔德菌抗原。使用测试开发者推荐的临界值来评估测试的敏感性和特异性。WB 和除 BimA 以外的所有 ELISA 都比 CFT 具有更高的特异性。与 CFT 相比,基于 TssA、TssB 和 BimA 抗原的 ELISA 敏感性显著降低,而 Hcp1-ELISA、IDVet-ELISA 和 WB 的敏感性与 CFT 无显著差异。鉴于它们具有相当的敏感性和特异性,CFT(98.0%,96.4%)、WB(96.8%,99.4%)、Hcp1-ELISA(95.3%,99.6%)和 IDVet-ELISA(92.5%,99.5%)应进一步开发以满足 OIE 的要求。