Suppr超能文献

蜥蜴的性别依赖性辨别学习:一项荟萃分析。

Sex-dependent discrimination learning in lizards: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Szabo Birgit, Whiting Martin J, Noble Daniel W A

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2019 Jul;164:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

Abstract

We have a poor understanding of differences in learning performance between male and female non-avian reptiles compared to other vertebrates. Learning studies in non-avian reptiles have greatly increased in the last 10 years providing an opportunity to test for sex-based learning using a meta-analysis. Although, we initially considered all reptiles, only lizard studies (N = 11) provided sufficient data to calculate effect sizes. We found weak evidence for sex-dependent learning and moderate heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies. Although, our hypothesized moderator variables (stimulus or task type, species, genus and family) explained little variation. Indeed, our results show that only one species (Egernia striolata) exhibited a sex-dependent learning difference, with males learning faster than females. Together, our meta-analysis indicated a general lack of effective reporting on attributes of study methodology (i.e., animal sex, sample sizes). We propose that future research improve reporting by openly sharing their data for the use in similar analyses. The limited sample currently constrains our ability to effectively disentangle whether sex differences vary across different tasks and stimuli. We urge authors to incorporate both sexes in experimental designs and test them on ecologically relevant cognitive assays to improve our understanding of the degree of sex differences in non-avian reptile learning.

摘要

与其他脊椎动物相比,我们对非鸟类爬行动物中雄性和雌性在学习表现上的差异了解甚少。在过去10年里,针对非鸟类爬行动物的学习研究大幅增加,这为通过荟萃分析来检验基于性别的学习提供了契机。虽然我们最初考虑了所有爬行动物,但只有蜥蜴研究(N = 11)提供了足够的数据来计算效应量。我们发现了性别依赖性学习的微弱证据,且各研究的效应量存在中等程度的异质性。尽管我们假设的调节变量(刺激或任务类型、物种、属和科)只能解释很少的变异。实际上,我们的结果表明只有一个物种(细纹埃氏蜥)表现出性别依赖性学习差异,雄性比雌性学习得更快。总体而言,我们的荟萃分析表明在研究方法的属性(即动物性别、样本量)方面普遍缺乏有效的报告。我们建议未来的研究通过公开共享数据以供类似分析使用来改进报告。目前有限的样本限制了我们有效厘清性别差异是否因不同任务和刺激而变化的能力。我们敦促作者在实验设计中纳入两性,并在与生态相关的认知测试中对它们进行测试,以增进我们对非鸟类爬行动物学习中性别差异程度的理解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验