Mutlu Onur, Olcay Ali Bahadır, Bilgin Cem, Hakyemez Bahattin
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeditepe University, Kayisdagi Cad, Istanbul, Turkey.
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeditepe University, Kayisdagi Cad, Istanbul, Turkey.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e727-e737. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.255. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
Flow diverter stents are often used in the treatment of giant aneurysms at carotid arteries. Although these stents promise to decrease blood flow into the aneurysm sac, little is known about hemodynamics inside the aneurysm once the stent is planted into the aneurysm neck. To further explore this, computational fluid dynamics and Lagrangian coherent structure (LCS) techniques were used to evaluate the time evolution mechanism of stagnation regions inside an aneurysm. The purpose of this work is to provide a quantitative effectiveness comparison of 2 different flow diverter stents placed into the aneurysm neck based on their stagnation zone formations in the sac.
In numerical modeling, Womersley function, and fluidsolid interaction were defined as the 3 cardiac cycles for blood velocity and the aneurysm wall, respectively. Moreover, blood was accepted as a non-Newtonian fluid, and mean arterial blood pressure of the patient was entered into the computational domain to accurately mimic the hemodynamics inside the aneurysm sac accurately.
The numerical analyses revealed that the use of a Fred-type stent in the aneurysm neck causes fluid flow zone formations yielding to sequenced stagnated regions. Time evolution of stagnation regions in an aneurysm sac was shown just after a flow diverter stent was employed at a patient's aneurysm neck. Furthermore, the stagnation field in the Fred stent-fitted aneurysm was nearly 4.8 times the stagnation area of the Surpass brand stent-attached aneurysm.
Finite time Lyapunov exponent fields obtained from the LCS techniques demonstrated a good agreement with the patient's digital subtraction angiography images obtained just after treatment.
血流导向支架常用于治疗颈动脉巨大动脉瘤。尽管这些支架有望减少流入瘤腔的血流,但一旦将支架植入动脉瘤颈部,关于瘤腔内的血流动力学情况却知之甚少。为进一步探究这一问题,采用计算流体动力学和拉格朗日相干结构(LCS)技术来评估动脉瘤内停滞区域的时间演变机制。本研究的目的是基于瘤腔内停滞区的形成情况,对两种不同的血流导向支架植入动脉瘤颈部后的定量有效性进行比较。
在数值模拟中,分别将Womersley函数和流固相互作用定义为血流速度和动脉瘤壁的3个心动周期。此外,将血液视为非牛顿流体,并将患者的平均动脉血压输入计算域,以准确模拟动脉瘤腔内的血流动力学。
数值分析表明,在动脉瘤颈部使用Fred型支架会导致流体流动区域形成一系列停滞区域。在患者的动脉瘤颈部植入血流导向支架后,立即显示出动脉瘤腔内停滞区域的时间演变。此外,安装Fred支架的动脉瘤内的停滞区域几乎是安装Surpass品牌支架的动脉瘤停滞区域的4.8倍。
从LCS技术获得的有限时间李雅普诺夫指数场与治疗后立即获得的患者数字减影血管造影图像显示出良好的一致性。