University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, 335 Guthrie Hall, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Jul;46(4):518-529. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00932-3.
Studies demonstrate that discrepancies among leader-follower perceptions of leadership are related to organizational processes that may impact evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. However, it is unknown whether discrepancies in leadership perceptions also predict EBP use. This study examined the association of principal-staff alignment and discrepancy in perceptions of implementation leadership with the dosage of three Autism-focused school-based EBPs, Discrete Trial Training, Pivotal Response Training (PRT), and Visual Schedules. PRT dosage was higher when principals under-rated their implementation leadership and when it was agreed upon that implementation leadership was low. Findings have implications for leaders support of EBPs implemented in school-based settings.
研究表明,领导者和追随者对领导力的看法存在差异与可能影响基于证据的实践(EBP)实施的组织过程有关。然而,领导者看法的差异是否也能预测 EBP 的使用尚不清楚。本研究考察了主要员工一致性和对实施领导力的看法差异与三个自闭症为重点的基于学校的 EBP 的剂量之间的关系,离散试验训练、关键反应训练(PRT)和视觉时间表。当校长低估他们的实施领导力,并且当他们一致认为实施领导力较低时,PRT 的剂量更高。这些发现对领导者在学校环境中实施 EBP 的支持具有重要意义。