Sport Science Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Ondokuz Mayıs University Performance Laboratory, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Yaşar Doğu Sport Science Faculty, 55100, Samsun, Turkey.
Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Ondokuz Mayıs University Performance Laboratory, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Yaşar Doğu Sport Science Faculty, 55100, Samsun, Turkey.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2019 Jun;264:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength of both healthy smokers and nonsmokers. Forty-two healthy males (16 in the IMT smokers group [IMT], 16 in the IMT nonsmokers group [IMT], and 10 in the placebo group) participated in the present study. Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, IMT and IMT underwent 4 weeks of 30 breaths twice daily at 50% (+5% increase each week) of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), while the placebo group maintained 30 breaths twice daily at 15% MIP using an IMT device. The data were analyzed with repeated measures for one-way analysis of variance, 3 × 2 mixed factor analysis of variance, and least significant difference tests. Respiratory muscle strength (MIP and maximal expiratory pressure [MEP]) and pulmonary functions significantly improved after a 4-week period (between the pre and posttests) in the IMT and IMT groups (p < 0.05). The mean difference and percentage differences showed significant alterations in the respiratory muscle strength, forced and slow pulmonary capacities, and pulmonary volume between the IMT and IMT groups (p < 0.05). There were significant changes in the expiratory muscle strength (MEP), slow vital capacity (SVC), and forced pulmonary measurements (forced expiratory volume after 1 s and maximal voluntary ventilation) between IMT and IMT groups in favor of smokers (p < 0.05). These results show that greater improvements occurred in smokers after IMT. Increased respiratory muscle strength may be the underlying mechanism responsible for this improvement. Additionally, the benefits of IMT were greater in smokers than nonsmokers. This difference between smokers and nonsmokers may potentially be explained by higher influence of exercise on smokers' lung microbiome, resulting in greater reversal of negative effects.
本研究旨在探讨吸气肌训练(IMT)对健康吸烟者和非吸烟者的肺功能和呼吸肌力量的影响。42 名健康男性(16 名在 IMT 吸烟者组 [IMT],16 名在 IMT 非吸烟者组 [IMT],10 名在安慰剂组)参与了本研究。采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照设计,IMT 和 IMT 组分别以 50%(每周增加+5%)最大吸气压力(MIP)进行每日 2 次 30 次呼吸训练,而安慰剂组则以 15%MIP 通过 IMT 装置进行每日 2 次 30 次呼吸训练。采用重复测量的单向方差分析、3×2 混合因子方差分析和最小显著差异检验对数据进行分析。在 4 周的治疗后,IMT 和 IMT 组的呼吸肌力量(MIP 和最大呼气压力 [MEP])和肺功能均显著改善(与治疗前相比,p<0.05)。IMT 和 IMT 组的呼吸肌力量、用力和缓慢肺活量以及肺容积的平均差异和百分比差异均有显著改变(p<0.05)。IMT 和 IMT 组的呼气肌力量(MEP)、用力肺活量(SVC)和用力肺功能(1 秒用力呼气量和最大自主通气量)均有显著变化,吸烟者更为显著(p<0.05)。这些结果表明,IMT 后吸烟者的改善更为明显。呼吸肌力量的增加可能是改善的潜在机制。此外,IMT 对吸烟者的益处大于非吸烟者。吸烟者和非吸烟者之间的这种差异可能是由于运动对吸烟者肺部微生物组的影响更大,从而导致负面效应的更大逆转。