Suppr超能文献

不同司法管辖区的气味影响标准是否确保了在同等保护水平下类似的隔离距离?

Do odour impact criteria of different jurisdictions ensure analogous separation distances for an equivalent level of protection?

机构信息

WG Environmental Health, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210, Vienna, Austria.

Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Hohe Warte 38, A-1190, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2019 Jun 15;240:394-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.102. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

Abstract

Governments are increasingly introducing odour impact criteria (OIC) to determine separation distances between odour sources and residential areas. Previous studies have shown the wide range of OIC available for this purpose, depending on the desired level of protection against odour annoyance. However, it is unclear whether OIC with similar levels of protection can ensure analogous separation distances, which would reasonably be expected. This study presents a comparative analysis of separation distances calculated at two sites for different OIC, but all related to an equivalent level of protection. Here, the equivalent level of protection was defined for urban residential areas (land use), swine odour (hedonic tone) and new facilities (facility type). In this manner, the regulatory criteria currently enforced in Germany, Ireland, and Queensland (Australia) were selected as references for the investigation. The results clearly show that, even for an equivalent level of protection, disparate separation distances can be obtained. Differences in separation distances were found to be greater in prevailing wind directions compared to distances in additional wind directions. Overall, the results demonstrate a risk of poor conclusions in odour assessments. This means that care must be taken when adopting OIC for decision making, principally in those countries that have not yet established specific regulations to manage environmental odours. Concomitantly, the results stress the need for better harmonisation of the concept of the odour impact criterion and components thereof. By using perturbation analysis, it has also been found that the stack exit temperature influences the separation distances in a distinct way, reliant on the criteria used to determine the distances. This finding is of significance for input data collection in future odour modelling studies. Furthermore, approaches used to derive OIC, equivalence between dispersion modelling and field inspections (European standard EN 16841-1), as well as implications of the findings for regulatory practice are summarised and discussed.

摘要

政府越来越多地引入气味影响标准 (OIC) 来确定气味源与居民区之间的隔离距离。以前的研究表明,有多种 OIC 可用于此目的,具体取决于对气味干扰的保护程度。然而,目前尚不清楚具有类似保护水平的 OIC 是否可以确保类似的隔离距离,而这是合理预期的。本研究对两个地点的不同 OIC 进行了比较分析,但所有 OIC 都与同等保护水平有关。在这里,将城市住宅区(土地利用)、猪气味(快乐色调)和新设施(设施类型)的等效保护水平定义为保护水平。通过这种方式,选择了德国、爱尔兰和昆士兰州(澳大利亚)目前执行的监管标准作为研究参考。结果清楚地表明,即使是等效的保护水平,也可以获得不同的隔离距离。与附加风向的距离相比,在主导风向的情况下,隔离距离的差异更大。总体而言,结果表明在气味评估中得出错误结论的风险较大。这意味着在做出决策时,必须谨慎采用 OIC,特别是在尚未制定特定法规来管理环境气味的国家。同时,结果强调了需要更好地协调气味影响标准及其组成部分的概念。通过使用摄动分析,还发现烟囱出口温度以明显依赖于确定距离所使用的标准的方式影响隔离距离。这一发现对于未来气味模型研究中的输入数据收集具有重要意义。此外,还总结和讨论了用于推导 OIC 的方法、扩散模型与现场检查之间的等效性(欧洲标准 EN 16841-1)以及研究结果对监管实践的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验