School of Chemistry and Biological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.
Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing, 100037, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(30):37684-37698. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09858-y. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
Airborne emissions from concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) have the potential to pose a risk to human health and the environment. Here, we present an assessment of the emission, dispersion, and health-related impact of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emitted from a 300-head, full-scale dairy farm with an exercise yard in Beijing, China. By monitoring the referred gas emissions with a dynamic flux chamber for seven consecutive days, we examined their emission rates. An annual hourly emission time series was constructed on the basis of the measured emission rates and a release modification model. The health risk of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions around the dairy farm was then determined using atmospheric dispersion modeling and exposure risk assessment. The body mass-related mean emission factors of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide were 2.13 kg a AU and 24.9 g a AU, respectively (one animal unit (AU) is equivalent to 500 kg body mass). A log-normal distribution fitted well to ammonia emission rates. Contour lines of predicted hourly mean concentrations of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide were mainly driven by the meteorological conditions. The concentrations of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide at the fence line were below 10 μg m and 0.04 μg m, respectively, and were 2-3 orders of magnitude lower than the current Chinese air quality standards for such pollutants. Moreover, the cumulative non-carcinogenic risks (HI) of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide were 4 orders of magnitudes lower than the acceptable risk levels (HI = 1). Considering a health risk criterion of 1E-4, the maximum distance from the farm fence line to meet this criterion was nearly 1000 m towards north-northeast. The encompassed area of the contour lines of the ambient concentration of ammonia is much larger than that of hydrogen sulfide. However, the contour lines of the ammonia health risk are analogous to those of hydrogen sulfide. In general, the ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from the dairy farm are unlikely to cause any health risks for the population living in the neighborhood.
养殖场排放的空气污染物(CAFOs)有可能对人类健康和环境构成威胁。本研究以北京一家具有运动场的 300 头奶牛的规模化奶牛场为例,评估了氨气和硫化氢排放的排放、扩散和与健康相关的影响。通过使用动态通量室连续七天监测这些气体的排放,我们测量了它们的排放速率。根据测量的排放率和释放修正模型,构建了一个年度每小时排放时间序列。然后,利用大气扩散模型和暴露风险评估来确定奶牛场周围空气中氨气和硫化氢排放的健康风险。奶牛场氨气和硫化氢的体质量相关平均排放因子分别为 2.13kg a AU 和 24.9g a AU(一个动物单位 (AU) 相当于 500kg 体重)。对数正态分布很好地拟合了氨气排放速率。预测的氨气和硫化氢小时平均浓度等高线主要受气象条件驱动。围栏线上的氨气和硫化氢浓度分别低于 10μg m 和 0.04μg m,比中国现行的此类污染物空气质量标准低 2-3 个数量级。此外,氨气和硫化氢的非致癌累积风险(HI)比可接受的风险水平(HI=1)低 4 个数量级。考虑到健康风险标准为 1E-4,从农场围栏线到满足该标准的最大距离几乎是向东北偏北方向 1000 米。氨气环境浓度等高线所涵盖的区域比硫化氢的要大得多。然而,氨气健康风险的等高线与硫化氢的相似。总的来说,奶牛场的氨气和硫化氢排放不太可能对周围居民造成任何健康风险。