Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Thoracic Cancer Service, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Oncol Res Treat. 2019;42(5):275-282. doi: 10.1159/000499086. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
Little is known regarding the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) efficacy and safety in the elderly.
Consecutive patients (n = 53) with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with an ALK TKI were identified through internal databases of three cancer centers and divided into groups A (< 65 years old; n = 34) and B (≥65 years old; n = 19). Progression-free survival (PFS), ALK TKI safety and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Uni- and multivariate PFS and OS analyses were performed.
Crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib were administered in 94 and 100%, 35 and 31%, 38 and 52% of patients in groups A and B, respectively. The median PFS (months) was 5.4 (95% CI, 3.4-12.4) and 5.6 (95% CI, 2.5-14.7) with crizotinib (log-rank 0.0009, p = 0.9), 4.7 (95% CI, 1.0-11.5) and 23.0 (95% CI, 0.8-27.7) with ceritinib (log-rank 0.44, p = 0.5), and 21.2 (95% CI, 1.2 to not reached, NR) and 5.6 (95% CI, 0.5 to NR) with alectinib (log-rank 0.53, p = 0.5) in groups A and B, respectively. The median OS (months) comprised 29.8 (95% CI, 21.0 to NR) and 25.1 (95% CI, 10.8-53.6) in groups A and B, respectively (log-rank 0.57, p = 0.4). Age affected neither PFS nor OS. 19 and 37%, 50 and 40%, and 0 and 0% of patients in groups A and B, treated with crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib, respectively, developed high-grade adverse events. The treatment discontinuation rate was 9 and 21%, 16 and 60%, 0 and 0% with crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib in groups A and B, respectively.
In the elderly, crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib treatments are associated with similar efficacy but different safety profiles; alectinib is associated with a lower rate of high-grade adverse events and a lower treatment discontinuation rate.
对于老年患者,间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)的疗效和安全性知之甚少。
通过三个癌症中心的内部数据库,确定了 53 名接受 ALK TKI 治疗的 ALK 阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,将他们分为 A 组(<65 岁;n=34)和 B 组(≥65 岁;n=19)。评估无进展生存期(PFS)、ALK TKI 安全性和总生存期(OS)。进行单变量和多变量 PFS 和 OS 分析。
在 A 组和 B 组中,分别有 94%和 100%的患者接受了克唑替尼、色瑞替尼和阿来替尼治疗,35%和 31%的患者接受了克唑替尼、色瑞替尼和阿来替尼治疗,38%和 52%的患者接受了克唑替尼、色瑞替尼和阿来替尼治疗。接受克唑替尼治疗的患者中位 PFS(月)为 5.4(95%CI,3.4-12.4)和 5.6(95%CI,2.5-14.7)(log-rank 0.0009,p=0.9),接受色瑞替尼治疗的患者中位 PFS(月)为 4.7(95%CI,1.0-11.5)和 23.0(95%CI,0.8-27.7)(log-rank 0.44,p=0.5),接受阿来替尼治疗的患者中位 PFS(月)为 21.2(95%CI,1.2 至未达到,NR)和 5.6(95%CI,0.5 至 NR)(log-rank 0.53,p=0.5)。A 组和 B 组的中位 OS(月)分别为 29.8(95%CI,21.0 至 NR)和 25.1(95%CI,10.8-53.6)(log-rank 0.57,p=0.4)。年龄既不影响 PFS 也不影响 OS。在 A 组和 B 组中,分别有 19%和 37%、50%和 40%以及 0%和 0%的接受克唑替尼、色瑞替尼和阿来替尼治疗的患者出现了 3 级及以上不良事件。A 组和 B 组中,因治疗相关不良事件而停药的患者比例分别为 9%和 21%、16%和 60%、0%和 0%。
在老年患者中,克唑替尼、色瑞替尼和阿来替尼治疗的疗效相似,但安全性不同;阿来替尼与更高的 3 级及以上不良事件发生率和更低的停药率相关。