Wolferman Nicholas, Hunter Trendha, Hirsch Jennifer S, Khan Shamus R, Reardon Leigh, Mellins Claude A
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(1):115-119. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0014.
This article presents the experience of one community-based participatory research (CBPR) board and moves board feedback beyond its dialogue with affiliated researchers, expanding the conversations to the broad research community.
The board member authors of this article were part of the Sexual Health Initiative to Foster Transformation (SHIFT), which had some of the highest subject participation rates within the literature on college sexual assault-84% in a daily diary study (N = 427) and 67% in a survey of 2,500 randomly selected students-and enjoyed an overall positive sentiment.
Based on the experience of board members this article outlines four recommendations for the construction of CBPR studies: meeting frequently, co-education of board members and researchers, addressing power and privilege, and prioritizing highly valued participation, with mutual respect for and recognition of distinct roles and expertise.
本文介绍了一个基于社区的参与性研究（CBPR）委员会的经验，并将委员会的反馈从与附属研究人员的对话扩展到更广泛的研究社区。
本文的委员会成员作者是促进转变性健康倡议（SHIFT）的一部分，该倡议在大学性侵犯文献中拥有一些最高的受试者参与率——在一项每日日记研究中为84%（N = 427），在对2500名随机选择的学生进行的调查中为67%——并且总体情绪积极。
基于委员会成员的经验，本文概述了CBPR研究构建的四项建议：频繁会面、委员会成员和研究人员的共同教育、解决权力和特权问题以及优先考虑高度重视的参与，同时相互尊重并认可不同的角色和专业知识。
