Zabelski Sasha, Cascalheira Cory J, Shaw Thomas J, Helminen Emily C, Messinger Adam M, Edwards Katie M, Scheer Jillian R
University of North Carolina at Charlotte, NC, USA.
Syracuse University, NY, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Aug 9:8862605241265441. doi: 10.1177/08862605241265441.
Research on sexual and gender minority (SGM) and domestic violence/sexual assault (DV/SA) is needed given that SGM people are at elevated risk of experiencing DV/SA and accessing inclusive and affirming services from DV/SA community agencies poses challenges for SGM survivors. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is emerging as a valuable methodological tool in this area, yet few CBPR studies focus on DV/SA among SGM people. In the current paper, we present a case study of a CBPR study conducted in collaboration with SGM survivors of DV/SA, as well as community stakeholders (i.e., DV/SA agency staff and providers). More specifically, we make six recommendations to address CBPR study challenges specifically focused on SGM DV/SA, including (a) integrating positionality throughout every step of the research process, (b) establishing rapport with community partners early in the process, (c) engaging external experts in conducting research related to SGM DV/SA to enhance community-research partnerships, (d) ensuring diverse identities are represented within the study team, (e) developing clear, co-defined feedback and communication guidelines with a Survivor Advisory Board (SAB), and (f) implementing an SAB engagement/retention plan. We also provide concrete examples from our CBPR case study to illustrate each recommendation. These recommendations may enhance the impact of conducting CBPR that seeks to promote recovery from DV/SA among SGM via practices for sustainable community partnerships and linkage-to-care efforts for SGM survivors.
鉴于性取向和性别少数群体(SGM)遭受家庭暴力/性侵犯(DV/SA)的风险较高,且从DV/SA社区机构获得包容性和肯定性服务对SGM幸存者构成挑战,因此需要开展关于SGM与DV/SA的研究。基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)正在成为该领域一种有价值的方法工具,但很少有CBPR研究关注SGM人群中的DV/SA问题。在本文中,我们介绍了一项与DV/SA的SGM幸存者以及社区利益相关者(即DV/SA机构工作人员和服务提供者)合作开展的CBPR研究的案例。更具体地说,我们提出了六项建议,以应对专门针对SGM DV/SA的CBPR研究挑战,包括:(a)在研究过程的每一步都融入立场性;(b)在过程早期与社区伙伴建立融洽关系;(c)邀请外部专家开展与SGM DV/SA相关的研究,以加强社区与研究的伙伴关系;(d)确保研究团队中有不同身份的代表;(e)与幸存者咨询委员会(SAB)制定明确的、共同定义的反馈和沟通指南;(f)实施SAB参与/留用计划。我们还从CBPR案例研究中提供了具体例子来说明每项建议。这些建议可能会增强开展CBPR的影响力,即通过可持续社区伙伴关系的实践以及为SGM幸存者提供联系护理的努力,促进SGM人群从DV/SA中恢复。