Duarte Thiago S, Alves Danilo L, Coimbra Danilo R, Miloski Bernardo, Bouzas Marins João C, Bara Filho Maurício G
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Nov 1;14(10):1338-1343. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0004.
To analyze the technical and tactical training load in professional volleyball players, using subjective internal training load (session rating of perceived exertion [SRPE]) and objective internal training load (training impulse of the heart rate [HR]) and the relationship between them.
The sample was composed of 15 male professional volleyball players. They were monitored during 37 training sessions that included both technical (n = 23) and tactical (n = 14) training. Technical and training load was calculated using SRPE and training impulse of the HR.
Significant correlations were found between the methods in tactical (r = .616) and technical training (r = -.414). Furthermore, it was noted that technical training occurs up to 80% of HRmax (zone 3) and tactical training between 70% and 90% of HRmax (zones 3-4).
The training impulse of the HR method has proved to be effective for training-load control during tactical training. However, it was limited compared with technical training. Thus, the use of SRPE is presented as a more reliable method in the different types of technical training in volleyball.
运用主观内部训练负荷(训练主观用力程度评级[SRPE])和客观内部训练负荷(心率训练冲量[HR])及其两者之间的关系,分析职业排球运动员的技术和战术训练负荷。
样本由15名男性职业排球运动员组成。在37次训练课期间对他们进行监测,这些训练课包括技术训练(n = 23)和战术训练(n = 14)。使用SRPE和HR训练冲量计算技术和训练负荷。
在战术训练(r = 0.616)和技术训练(r = -0.414)中,两种方法之间存在显著相关性。此外,注意到技术训练可达最大心率(HRmax)的80%(第3区),战术训练在HRmax的70%至90%之间(第3 - 4区)。
HR方法的训练冲量已被证明在战术训练期间对训练负荷控制有效。然而,与技术训练相比它存在局限性。因此,在排球不同类型的技术训练中,SRPE的使用被认为是一种更可靠的方法。