Yuan Qi, Huang Dongmei, Hu Yiwei, Shen Liming, Shi Long, Zhang Mingzhen
College of Quality and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Xilinmen Furniture Co., Ltd., Shaoxing 312000, China.
Polymers (Basel). 2019 Jan 8;11(1):88. doi: 10.3390/polym11010088.
Fire behaviors of rubber latex foam under different thickness conditions ( = 1, 2, and 5 cm) were explored by using a self-built small-scale experimental platform. It can be shown that the flame spread menchanism of thermally thin and thermally thick rubber latex foam is different. Rubber latex foam with a thickness of 2 cm shows higher fire risk, whose value of flame spread rate, maximum flame height, maximum mass loss rate, and maximum temperature are 2.93 × 10 m/s, 851.88 mm, and 1.83 g/s, 948.00 °C, respectively. On the one hand, this may due to the different mechanisms of flame spread, resulting in different preheating zones on the surface. On the other hand, this may because the thickness of residue formed by thermally thick materials is larger than the thin ones, obstructing the contact of the rubber latex foam with fresh air. In addition, a special phenomenon is noticed during the stage II, where the bottom unburned zone is located in the four edges (thermally thin material) and middle player (thermally thick material).
利用自建的小型实验平台,探究了不同厚度条件(1厘米、2厘米和5厘米)下乳胶泡沫橡胶的燃烧行为。结果表明,热薄和热厚乳胶泡沫橡胶的火焰蔓延机制不同。厚度为2厘米的乳胶泡沫橡胶显示出更高的火灾风险,其火焰蔓延速率、最大火焰高度、最大质量损失率和最高温度分别为2.93×10米/秒、851.88毫米、1.83克/秒和948.00℃。一方面,这可能是由于火焰蔓延机制不同,导致表面预热区不同。另一方面,这可能是因为热厚材料形成的残余物厚度大于热薄材料,阻碍了乳胶泡沫橡胶与新鲜空气的接触。此外,在第二阶段还注意到一个特殊现象,即底部未燃烧区位于四个边缘(热薄材料)和中间部分(热厚材料)。