Department of Physiotherapy, Own Master in evaluation, physiotherapy and reconditioning in sports science, University of Valencia, Calle Gascó Oliag 3, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
School of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Valencia, Calle Gascó Oliag 3, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Apr 9;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2533-0.
Literature addressing the mechanical properties of kinesiology tape is quite scarce. There are no studies which focus on the mechanical characteristics of kinesiology tape, its mechanical properties, nor its adherence following the ISO international standard test methods for tape elongation.
This study quantified the mechanical characteristics of 380 samples of kinesiology tape from 19 different brands and in 4 different colors using a dynamometer. Mechanical testing was controlled by UNE EN ISO 13934-1.
Significant differences were found between tape brands in terms of grammage, maximum force tenacity, work, pre-elongation and percentage elongation (P < .001). Regarding kinesiology tape color, statistically significant differences were found between tape brands in terms of grammage, maximum force and tenacity (P < .001), work and pre-elongation (P < .05). When adherence was studied, statistically significant differences were found between tape brands in terms of maximum force and work (P < .001).
The different kinesiology tapes presented different behaviors with regard to rupture and removal when applied to skin in dry state, wet state and after being submerged in artificial acidic sweat solution. Therefore, different kinesiology tape brands will produce different levels of strain even though the same elongation is used. Depending on the characteristics (body dimensions) and properties (skin elongation) of each subject in the sample, bandages with different elongations must be applied to achieve the same strain in all of the tapes and therefore produce the same effect. The absence of these data at this time limits the reliability of previous clinical studies, makes comparing their findings impossible and presents new challenges for research in this field.
关于运动贴扎力学特性的文献相当匮乏。目前尚无研究专注于运动贴扎的力学特性、机械性能,以及其贴合性是否符合国际标准化组织(ISO)的胶带拉伸试验方法国际标准。
本研究使用测力计对 19 个不同品牌的 380 个运动贴扎样本的力学特性进行了量化,这些样本分为 4 种不同颜色。机械测试受 UNE EN ISO 13934-1 控制。
不同品牌的运动贴扎在克重、最大拉伸力强度、功、预伸长率和伸长率(P<.001)方面存在显著差异。至于运动贴扎的颜色,在克重、最大拉伸力和强度(P<.001)、功和预伸长率(P<.05)方面,不同品牌的运动贴扎之间存在统计学上的显著差异。在研究贴合性时,不同品牌的运动贴扎在最大拉伸力和功方面存在统计学上的显著差异(P<.001)。
在干燥、湿润和浸入人工酸性汗液后应用于皮肤时,不同的运动贴扎在断裂和移除方面表现出不同的行为。因此,即使使用相同的伸长率,不同品牌的运动贴扎也会产生不同程度的应变。根据样本中每个个体的特征(身体尺寸)和特性(皮肤伸长率),必须使用具有不同伸长率的绷带来达到所有贴扎带的相同应变,从而产生相同的效果。目前缺乏这些数据限制了先前临床研究的可靠性,使得比较其研究结果变得不可能,并为该领域的研究带来了新的挑战。