• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心力衰竭伴窦性节律患者的抗凝治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Anticoagulation therapy in heart failure and sinus rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavn, Kbh Ø, Denmark.

出版信息

Heart. 2019 Sep;105(17):1325-1334. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314381. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314381
PMID:30962190
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Heart failure is a prothrombotic state, and it has been hypothesised that thrombosis and embolism cause non-fatal and fatal events in heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We sought to determine the effect of anticoagulant therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF who are in sinus rhythm.

METHODS

We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of anticoagulation therapy in patients with HFrEF in sinus rhythm. Our analysis compared patients randomised to anticoagulant therapy with those randomised to antiplatelet therapy, placebo or control, and examined the endpoints of all-cause mortality, (re)hospitalisation for worsening heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke of any aetiology and major haemorrhage.

RESULTS

Five trials were identified that met the prespecified search criteria. Compared with control therapy, anticoagulant treatment did not reduce all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.08), (re)hospitalisation for heart failure (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.13) or non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.13). Anticoagulation did reduce the rate of non-fatal stroke (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.81, p=0.001), but this was offset by an increase in the incidence of major haemorrhage (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.38, p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis provides evidence to oppose the hypothesis that thrombosis or embolism plays an important role in the morbidity and mortality associated with HFrEF, with the exception of stroke-related morbidity.

摘要

目的

心力衰竭是一种促血栓形成状态,据推测血栓形成和栓塞导致心力衰竭和射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者发生非致命性和致命性事件。我们旨在确定窦性心律的 HFrEF 患者接受抗凝治疗对临床结局的影响。

方法

我们进行了更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以检查窦性心律的 HFrEF 患者抗凝治疗的效果。我们的分析比较了随机接受抗凝治疗的患者与随机接受抗血小板治疗、安慰剂或对照组的患者,并检查了全因死亡率、(因)心力衰竭恶化再住院、非致命性心肌梗死、任何病因的非致命性卒中和大出血的主要终点。

结果

确定了五项符合预设搜索标准的试验。与对照组治疗相比,抗凝治疗并未降低全因死亡率(风险比 [RR] 0.99,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.90 至 1.08)、(因)心力衰竭再住院(RR 0.97,95%CI 0.82 至 1.13)或非致命性心肌梗死(RR 0.92,95%CI 0.75 至 1.13)。抗凝治疗确实降低了非致命性卒中的发生率(RR 0.63,95%CI 0.49 至 0.81,p=0.001),但这被大出血发生率增加所抵消(RR 1.88,95%CI 1.49 至 2.38,p=0.001)。

结论

我们的荟萃分析提供了证据反对血栓形成或栓塞在与 HFrEF 相关的发病率和死亡率中起重要作用的假设,除了与卒中相关的发病率外。

相似文献

1
Anticoagulation therapy in heart failure and sinus rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心力衰竭伴窦性节律患者的抗凝治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart. 2019 Sep;105(17):1325-1334. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314381. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
2
Antiplatelet versus anticoagulation treatment for patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm.窦性心律心力衰竭患者的抗血小板治疗与抗凝治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 15;9(9):CD003333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003333.pub3.
3
A comparison of anticoagulation, antiplatelet, and placebo treatment for patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较窦性心律射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的抗凝、抗血小板和安慰剂治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Fail Rev. 2020 Mar;25(2):207-216. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09818-w.
4
Meta-Analysis of Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Sinus Rhythm.射血分数降低的心力衰竭伴窦性节律患者抗血栓治疗策略的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 15;127:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
5
Updated meta-analysis on antithrombotic therapy in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm.更新的心力衰竭伴窦性节律患者抗血栓治疗的荟萃分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Jan;15(1):69-78. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs171. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
6
Quality of anticoagulation control in preventing adverse events in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm: Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction trial substudy.窦性心律心力衰竭患者抗凝控制预防不良事件的质量:心脏射血分数降低患者华法林与阿司匹林对比试验的子研究
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 May;8(3):504-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001725. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
7
Oral anticoagulation versus antiplatelet or placebo for stroke prevention in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服抗凝剂与抗血小板或安慰剂治疗心力衰竭伴窦性心律患者的卒中预防:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Dec;14(9):856-861. doi: 10.1177/1747493019877296. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
8
Anticoagulation versus placebo for heart failure in sinus rhythm.窦性心律心力衰竭的抗凝治疗与安慰剂对照
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13(6):CD003336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003336.pub2.
9
Prophylactic warfarin post anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.前壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死后预防性使用华法林:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Dec;18(8):559-564. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 9.
10
Efficacy and safety of warfarin vs. antiplatelet therapy in patients with systolic heart failure and sinus rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.华法林与抗血小板治疗在收缩性心力衰竭伴窦性节律患者中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Stroke. 2014 Feb;9(2):199-206. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12036. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease: A Comprehensive Evidence-Based Review.优化心房颤动合并心脏瓣膜病患者的抗凝策略:一项基于证据的全面综述
Cureus. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):e81319. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81319. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Does anticoagulation therapy improve outcomes in severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction? A systematic review: Anticoagulation in severe heart failure: a systematic review.抗凝治疗能否改善射血分数降低的重度心力衰竭患者的预后?一项系统评价:重度心力衰竭中的抗凝治疗:一项系统评价。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 7;87(3):1576-1582. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002966. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Cardiac stasis imaging, stroke, and silent brain infarcts in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者的心脏瘀血性影像学表现、卒中和无症状性脑梗死。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2024 Aug 1;327(2):H446-H453. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00245.2024. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
Development and validation of a risk model for intracardiac thrombosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a retrospective study.扩张型心肌病患者心腔内血栓形成风险模型的建立与验证:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 16;14(1):1431. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51745-w.
5
Duration of Heightened Risk of Acute Ischemic Stroke After Hospitalization for Acute Systolic Heart Failure.急性收缩性心力衰竭住院后急性缺血性脑卒中风险升高的持续时间。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Mar 21;12(6):e027179. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027179. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
6
Cardiac CT for intra-cardiac thrombus detection in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS).心脏CT用于检测不明来源栓塞性卒中(ESUS)患者的心内血栓。
Eur Stroke J. 2022 Sep;7(3):212-220. doi: 10.1177/23969873221099692. Epub 2022 May 12.
7
Association between anticoagulant therapy, exacerbations and mortality in a Danish cohort of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.抗凝治疗与丹麦慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者恶化和死亡的相关性研究。
Sci Prog. 2022 Apr-Jun;105(2):368504221104331. doi: 10.1177/00368504221104331.
8
Mechanism of CREB1 in cardiac function of rats with heart failure via regulating the microRNA-376a-3p/TRAF6 axis.CREB1 在心力衰竭大鼠心脏功能中的作用机制通过调节 microRNA-376a-3p/TRAF6 轴。
Mamm Genome. 2022 Sep;33(3):490-501. doi: 10.1007/s00335-022-09947-y. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
9
Prognostic value of microRNAs in heart failure: A meta-analysis.miRNAs 在心力衰竭中的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 19;100(46):e27744. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027744.
10
Evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with heart failure after myocardial infarction by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.经食管实时三维超声心动图对心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者左心室功能的评估
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):10380-10387. eCollection 2021.