• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窦性心律心力衰竭的抗凝治疗与安慰剂对照

Anticoagulation versus placebo for heart failure in sinus rhythm.

作者信息

Lip Gregory Yh, Wrigley Benjamin J, Pisters Ron

机构信息

University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13(6):CD003336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003336.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003336.pub2
PMID:22696335
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic heart failure (heart failure) are at risk of thromboembolic events, including stroke, pulmonary embolism and peripheral arterial embolism, whilst coronary ischaemic events also contribute to the progression of heart failure. Long-term oral anticoagulation is established in certain groups, including patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation, but there is wide variation in the indications and use of oral anticoagulation in the broader heart failure population.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether long-term oral anticoagulation reduces total deaths and/or major thromboembolic events in patients with heart failure.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated the searches in February 2010 on CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2010), MEDLINE (2000 to February 2010) and EMBASE (1998 to February 2010). Reference lists of papers and abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings were studied to identify unpublished studies. Relevant authors were contacted to obtain further data. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral anticoagulants with placebo in adults with heart failure, and with treatment duration at least one month. Non-randomised studies were also included for assessing side-effects. Inclusion decisions were duplicated, disagreement resolved by discussion or a third party.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and assessed the risks and benefits from antithrombotic therapy using relative measures of effects, such as odds ratio, accompanied with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

Two RCTs were identified. One compared warfarin, aspirin and no antithrombotic therapy and the second compared warfarin with placebo in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Three small prospective controlled studies of warfarin in heart failure were also identified, but were over 50 years old with methods not considered reliable by modern standards. In both WASH 2004 and HELAS 2006, there were no significant differences in the incidence of myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and death between patients taking oral anticoagulation and placebo. Four retrospective non-randomised cohort analyses and four observational studies of oral anticoagulation in heart failure included differing populations of heart failure patients and reported contradictory results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the two major randomised trials (HELAS 2006; WASH 2004), there is no convincing evidence that oral anticoagulant therapy modifies mortality or vascular events in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm. Although oral anticoagulation is indicated in certain groups of patients with heart failure (for example atrial fibrillation), the data available does not support its routine use in heart failure patients who remain in sinus rhythm. A large randomised trial of warfarin in heart failure patients in sinus rhythm is currently in progress and data from this trial will be a useful addition to this topic.

摘要

背景

慢性心力衰竭患者有发生血栓栓塞事件的风险,包括中风、肺栓塞和外周动脉栓塞,而冠状动脉缺血事件也会促使心力衰竭病情进展。在某些人群中,包括心力衰竭合并房颤患者,长期口服抗凝治疗已得到确立,但在更广泛的心力衰竭人群中,口服抗凝治疗的适应证和使用情况存在很大差异。

目的

确定长期口服抗凝治疗是否能降低心力衰竭患者的全因死亡和/或主要血栓栓塞事件发生率。

检索方法

我们于2010年2月更新了对Cochrane图书馆CENTRAL(2010年第1期)、MEDLINE(2000年至2010年2月)和EMBASE(1998年至2010年2月)的检索。研究了国内和国际心血管会议论文及摘要的参考文献列表,以识别未发表的研究。联系了相关作者以获取更多数据。未设语言限制。

选择标准

比较口服抗凝剂与安慰剂用于成年心力衰竭患者且治疗持续时间至少1个月的随机对照试验(RCT)。还纳入了非随机研究以评估副作用。纳入决策进行了重复,分歧通过讨论或第三方解决。

数据收集与分析

四位综述作者独立评估试验是否纳入,并使用效应的相对测量指标(如比值比)及95%置信区间评估抗栓治疗的风险和益处。

主要结果

识别出两项RCT。一项比较了华法林、阿司匹林和不进行抗栓治疗,另一项比较了华法林与安慰剂用于特发性扩张型心肌病患者。还识别出三项关于华法林用于心力衰竭的小型前瞻性对照研究,但这些研究已有50多年历史,其方法按现代标准不被认为可靠。在WASH 2004和HELAS 2006中,口服抗凝治疗组与安慰剂组患者在心肌梗死、非致命性中风和死亡发生率方面均无显著差异。四项回顾性非随机队列分析和四项关于心力衰竭患者口服抗凝治疗的观察性研究纳入了不同的心力衰竭患者群体,报告结果相互矛盾。

作者结论

基于两项主要随机试验(HELAS 2006;WASH 2004),没有令人信服的证据表明口服抗凝治疗能改变窦性心律心力衰竭患者的死亡率或血管事件。虽然在某些心力衰竭患者群体(如房颤患者)中需要口服抗凝治疗,但现有数据不支持在窦性心律的心力衰竭患者中常规使用。一项关于华法林用于窦性心律心力衰竭患者的大型随机试验正在进行中,该试验的数据将为这一主题增添有用信息。

相似文献

1
Anticoagulation versus placebo for heart failure in sinus rhythm.窦性心律心力衰竭的抗凝治疗与安慰剂对照
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13(6):CD003336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003336.pub2.
2
Anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm.窦性心律心力衰竭的抗凝治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD003336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003336.
3
Antiplatelet versus anticoagulation treatment for people with heart failure in sinus rhythm.窦性心律心力衰竭患者的抗血小板治疗与抗凝治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 11;6(6):CD003333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003333.pub4.
4
Anticoagulation versus placebo for heart failure in sinus rhythm.窦性心律心力衰竭患者使用抗凝剂与安慰剂的对照研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 28;2014(3):CD003336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003336.pub3.
5
Anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm: a Cochrane systematic review.窦性心律心力衰竭的抗凝治疗:Cochrane系统评价
QJM. 2002 Jul;95(7):451-9. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.7.451.
6
Antiplatelet agents versus control or anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm: a Cochrane systematic review.抗血小板药物与对照或抗凝治疗用于窦性心律心力衰竭的疗效比较:一项Cochrane系统评价
QJM. 2002 Jul;95(7):461-8. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.7.461.
7
Antiplatelet agents versus control or anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm.抗血小板药物与对照或抗凝治疗用于窦性心律心力衰竭的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD003333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003333.
8
Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants for hypertension.用于高血压的抗血小板药物和抗凝剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003186.pub3.
9
Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants for hypertension.用于高血压的抗血小板药物和抗凝剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD003186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003186.pub2.
10
Anticoagulation versus placebo for heart failure in sinus rhythm.抗凝治疗与安慰剂用于窦性心律心力衰竭。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 18;5(5):CD003336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003336.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Flow transport and not ejection fraction determines blood stasis in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function.在左心室收缩功能受损的患者中,血流运输而非射血分数决定了血液瘀滞。
Physiol Rep. 2025 Jul;13(13):e70351. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70351.
2
Usefulness of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide for Predicting the Risk of Stroke in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.B 型利钠肽对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者发生卒中风险的预测价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):e024302. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024302. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
3
Anticoagulation versus placebo for heart failure in sinus rhythm.
抗凝治疗与安慰剂用于窦性心律心力衰竭。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 18;5(5):CD003336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003336.pub4.
4
Arterial Stiffness and Indices of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Etiology.不明原因栓塞性脑卒中患者的动脉僵硬度与左心室舒张功能障碍指数。
Dis Markers. 2019 Sep 12;2019:9636197. doi: 10.1155/2019/9636197. eCollection 2019.
5
Heart Failure and Stroke.心力衰竭与中风。
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2018 Oct;15(5):287-296. doi: 10.1007/s11897-018-0405-9.
6
Korean Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure.《韩国慢性心力衰竭诊断与管理指南》
Korean Circ J. 2017 Sep;47(5):555-643. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0009. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
7
Unmet Needs in Anticoagulant Therapy: Potential Role of Rivaroxaban.抗凝治疗中未满足的需求:利伐沙班的潜在作用。
Cardiol Res. 2015 Jun;6(3):267-277. doi: 10.14740/cr413w. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
8
Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: stroke risk stratification and anticoagulation.心力衰竭中的心房颤动:卒中风险分层与抗凝治疗
Heart Fail Rev. 2014 May;19(3):305-13. doi: 10.1007/s10741-014-9420-4.
9
Dabigatran versus warfarin under standard or pharmacogenetic-guided management for the prevention of stroke and systemic thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: a cost/utility analysis using an analytic decision model.达比加群酯与华法林在标准或基于药物遗传学的管理下用于预防房颤患者的中风和全身性血栓栓塞:使用分析决策模型进行的成本-效用分析。
Thromb J. 2013 Jul 17;11(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1477-9560-11-14.
10
Safety and efficacy of new anticoagulants in patients with heart failure.新型抗凝剂在心力衰竭患者中的安全性和有效性。
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2013 Mar;10(1):18-25. doi: 10.1007/s11897-012-0125-5.