Roerdink Melvyn, de Jonge Christa P, Smid Lisette M, Daffertshofer Andreas
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Physiol. 2019 Mar 22;10:257. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00257. eCollection 2019.
The correlational structure of stride-to-stride fluctuations differs between healthy and pathological gait. Uncorrelated and anti-persistent stride-to-stride fluctuations are believed to indicate pathology whereas persistence represents healthy functioning. However, this reading can be questioned because the correlational structure changes with task constraints, like acoustic pacing, signifying the tightness of control over particular gait parameters. We tested this "tightness-of-control interpretation" by varying the maneuverability range during treadmill walking (small, intermediate, and large walking areas), with and without acoustic pacing. Stride-speed fluctuations exhibited anti-persistence, suggesting that stride speeds were tightly controlled, with a stronger degree of anti-persistence for smaller walking areas. Constant-speed goal-equivalent-manifold decompositions revealed simultaneous control of stride times and stride lengths, especially for smaller walking areas to limit stride-speed fluctuations. With acoustic pacing, participants followed both constant-speed and constant-stride-time task goals. This was reflected by a strong degree of anti-persistence around the stride-time by stride-length point that uniquely satisfied both goals. Our results strongly support the notion that anti-persistence in stride-to-stride fluctuations reflect the tightness of control over the associated gait parameter, while not tightly regulated gait parameters exhibit statistical persistence. We extend the existing body of knowledge by showing quantitative changes in anti-persistence of already tightly regulated stride-speed fluctuations.
健康步态和病态步态中步幅间波动的相关结构有所不同。不相关和反持续性的步幅间波动被认为表明存在病理状况,而持续性则代表健康的功能状态。然而,这种解读可能受到质疑,因为相关结构会随着任务限制而变化,比如声音起搏,这意味着对特定步态参数的控制紧密程度。我们通过在跑步机行走过程中改变可操控范围(小、中、大步行区域),分别在有和没有声音起搏的情况下,测试了这种“控制紧密性解读”。步速波动呈现出反持续性,这表明步速受到严格控制,且步行区域越小,反持续性程度越强。恒速目标等效流形分解显示对步幅时间和步幅长度进行了同时控制,特别是在较小步行区域以限制步速波动。在声音起搏的情况下,参与者同时遵循恒速和恒步幅时间的任务目标。这通过在步幅时间与步幅长度的点周围存在高度反持续性得以体现,该点独特地满足了两个目标。我们的结果有力地支持了这样一种观点,即步幅间波动中的反持续性反映了对相关步态参数的控制紧密程度,而未受到严格调节的步态参数则表现出统计上的持续性。我们通过展示已经受到严格调节的步速波动反持续性的定量变化,扩展了现有的知识体系。