• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

浪漫关系中经历不忠时的不宽恕动机:消极情绪和对伴侣的焦虑依恋作为预测因素。

Unforgiveness Motivations in Romantic Relationships Experiencing Infidelity: Negative Affect and Anxious Attachment to the Partner as Predictors.

作者信息

Beltrán-Morillas Ana M, Valor-Segura Inmaculada, Expósito Francisca

机构信息

Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center, Department of Social Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 22;10:434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00434. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00434
PMID:30967804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6439209/
Abstract

Infidelity is considered an unforgivable betrayal. However, not all behaviors considered unfaithful affect the person who suffers them in the same way. Therefore, to have a better understanding of unforgiveness according to different extradyadic behaviors, two studies were designed. Study 1 ( = 240) explored which extradyadic behaviors are considered as more indicative of infidelity. The results revealed that sexual behaviors were considered more unfaithful when compared with technological, emotional/affective, and solitary behaviors. Study 2 ( = 378) examined the influence of experienced extradyadic behaviors on unforgiveness, negative affect, and anxious attachment to the partner. The results showed that (a) sexual and technological behaviors were less frequently forgiven and promoted a more intense negative affect, (b) anxious attachment was predictive of unforgiveness for sexual and technological behaviors, and (c) negative affect mediated the relationship between anxious attachment and unforgiveness for sexual and technological behaviors. These findings and their possible implications for romantic relationships are discussed.

摘要

不忠被视为一种不可原谅的背叛。然而,并非所有被视为不忠的行为都会以相同的方式影响遭受这些行为的人。因此,为了根据不同的婚外行为更好地理解不可原谅,设计了两项研究。研究1(N = 240)探讨了哪些婚外行为被认为更能表明不忠。结果显示,与涉及科技、情感/感情以及独处方面的行为相比,性行为被认为更不忠。研究2(N = 378)考察了经历过的婚外行为对不可原谅、负面影响以及对伴侣的焦虑依恋的影响。结果表明:(a)性行为和涉及科技的行为较少被原谅,并引发更强烈的负面影响;(b)焦虑依恋可预测对性行为和涉及科技的行为的不可原谅;(c)负面影响在焦虑依恋与对性行为和涉及科技的行为的不可原谅之间起中介作用。本文讨论了这些发现及其对浪漫关系可能产生的影响

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323d/6439209/8e8eb87aa3cd/fpsyg-10-00434-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323d/6439209/0325ac6d4fc9/fpsyg-10-00434-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323d/6439209/8e8eb87aa3cd/fpsyg-10-00434-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323d/6439209/0325ac6d4fc9/fpsyg-10-00434-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323d/6439209/8e8eb87aa3cd/fpsyg-10-00434-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Unforgiveness Motivations in Romantic Relationships Experiencing Infidelity: Negative Affect and Anxious Attachment to the Partner as Predictors.浪漫关系中经历不忠时的不宽恕动机:消极情绪和对伴侣的焦虑依恋作为预测因素。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 22;10:434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00434. eCollection 2019.
2
Unforgiveness in the Light of Sexual Infidelity: Anxious Attachment to the Partner and Personal Distress as Correlates.性不忠视角下的不宽恕:与伴侣的焦虑依恋和个人痛苦的相关性
Psychol Rep. 2025 Oct;128(5):3457-3477. doi: 10.1177/00332941231208395. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Faith and unfaithfulness: can praying for your partner reduce infidelity?信仰与不忠:为伴侣祈祷能否减少不忠行为?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):649-59. doi: 10.1037/a0019628.
4
Infidelity in the Adolescence Stage: The Roles of Negative Affect, Hostility, and Psychological Well-Being.青少年阶段的不忠行为:负面情绪、敌意和心理健康的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 25;20(5):4114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054114.
5
Unfaithful individuals are less likely to practice safer sex than openly nonmonogamous individuals.不忠的个体比公开的非一夫一妻制个体更不可能采取安全性行为。
J Sex Med. 2012 Jun;9(6):1559-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02712.x. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
6
[Extradyadic Sex and its Predictors in Homo- and Heterosexuals.].[异性性行为及其在同性恋者和异性恋者中的预测因素。]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2014 Dec;64(12):458-464. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390423. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
7
Motivations for Extradyadic Infidelity Revisited.再探多角关系外遇的动机。
J Sex Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;56(3):273-286. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1393494. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
8
The Webs We Weave: Predicting Infidelity Motivations and Extradyadic Relationship Satisfaction.我们编织的网:预测不忠动机和婚外关系满意度。
J Sex Res. 2021 Feb;58(2):170-182. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1746954. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
Partner-Specific Dependency and Guilt as Predictors of Forgiveness in Spanish University Women.西班牙大学女性中特定伴侣的依赖和内疚作为宽恕的预测因素
Span J Psychol. 2019 Apr 26;22:E19. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.19.
10
Infidelity in Dating Relationships: Gender-Specific Correlates of Face-to-Face and Online Extradyadic Involvement.约会关系中的不忠行为:面对面和网络上的婚外情在性别上的相关因素
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0576-3. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Infidelity in the Adolescence Stage: The Roles of Negative Affect, Hostility, and Psychological Well-Being.青少年阶段的不忠行为:负面情绪、敌意和心理健康的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 25;20(5):4114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054114.
2
Extradyadic Behaviors and Gender: How Do They Relate With Sexual Desire, Relationship Quality, and Attractiveness.婚外行为与性别:它们如何与性欲、关系质量和吸引力相关联。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 3;10:2554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02554. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Sexual and Emotional Infidelity: Evolved Gender Differences in Jealousy Prove Robust and Replicable.性和情感不忠:嫉妒的进化性别差异被证明是强大且可复制的。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):155-160. doi: 10.1177/1745691617698225.
2
Infidelity in romantic relationships.浪漫关系中的不忠行为。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Feb;13:70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
3
Do You Have Anything to Hide? Infidelity-Related Behaviors on Social Media Sites and Marital Satisfaction.你有什么要隐瞒的吗?社交媒体网站上与不忠相关的行为和婚姻满意度。
Comput Human Behav. 2017 Jan;66:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
4
Forgiveness in Romantic Relationships: The Roles of Attachment, Empathy, and Attributions.浪漫关系中的宽恕:依恋、同理心和归因的作用。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2016 Oct;42(4):645-658. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12171. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
5
Sociosexuality, Commitment, Sexual Infidelity, and Perceptions of Infidelity: Data From the Second Love Web Site.社交性行为、承诺、性不忠及对不忠行为的认知:来自第二个爱情网站的数据。
J Sex Res. 2017 Feb;54(2):241-253. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1145182. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
6
Drawing the Line: The Development of a Comprehensive Assessment of Infidelity Judgments.划定界限:不忠判断综合评估的发展
J Sex Res. 2016 Oct;53(8):910-926. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1062840. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
Facebook or Memory: Which Is the Real Threat to Your Relationship?脸书还是记忆:哪一个才是你人际关系的真正威胁?
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Oct;18(10):561-6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0259. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
8
Defining infidelity in research and couple counseling: a qualitative study.界定研究与夫妻咨询中的不忠行为:一项定性研究。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41(5):487-97. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2014.931314. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
9
The third wheel: the impact of Twitter use on relationship infidelity and divorce.第三者:Twitter 使用对婚姻不忠和离婚的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jul;17(7):425-30. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0570. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
10
Sex differences in attitudes toward partner infidelity.对伴侣不忠态度上的性别差异。
Evol Psychol. 2013 Aug 6;11(4):821-32. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100407.