School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
Institute of Management Studies, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, KPK, 25120, Pakistan.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jun;26(16):16053-16075. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05004-5. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
A plethora of empirical work explored finance-income-environment nexus, aims to investigate high CO emissions determinants, over the last few couples of decades. The prior empirical work assist the idea that finance and income have diverse impacts on the environment. The lack of consensus on finance-income-environment nexus in the Central and Eastern European Countries in the perspective of Belt and Road Initiative need to be examined. Therefore, the present study explores the nexus between financial development, income level, and environmental quality for a panel of eighteen Central and Eastern European Countries, over the period of 1980-2016. The Dynamic Seemingly Unrelated Regression, the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares, and the Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel casualty approaches are employed. The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis also investigated for both time series panel and country-wise. The Dynamic Seemingly Unrelated Regression long-run panel results reveal that (i) financial development index and income negatively impact on environmental quality; (ii) energy consumption is the key determinant of CO emissions and reduces environmental quality; (iii) urbanization and trade both enhance environmental quality via reduction of carbon emissions; and (iv) the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis supported for the selected panel countries. The country-wise results depict that increase in environmental quality occurs due to increase in financial development (in four countries), income level (in five countries), trade (in five countries), and urbanization (in eight countries). However, the environmental quality decreases due to the increase in financial development (in six countries), income level (in eight countries), energy consumption (in twelve countries), trade (in six countries), and urbanization (in five countries). The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis supported for five Central and Eastern European Countries. Additionally, the causality results confirmed the presence of feedback relationships among income and environmental quality, and financial development and energy consumption. Thus, we conclude that income level and financial development are the main drivers behind high carbon dioxide emissions in CEECs. The finding of the study opens up new insight for appropriate policymaking.
大量的实证研究探讨了金融-收入-环境关系,旨在研究过去几十年中高 CO2 排放的决定因素。先前的实证研究表明,金融和收入对环境有不同的影响。需要研究“一带一路”倡议视角下中东欧国家金融-收入-环境关系的共识。因此,本研究探讨了 1980-2016 年期间中东欧 18 个国家金融发展、收入水平与环境质量之间的关系。采用动态似乎不相关回归、全修正最小二乘法和 Dumitrescu-Hurlin 面板因果关系方法。还检验了时间序列面板和国家层面的环境库兹涅茨曲线假说。动态似乎不相关回归长期面板结果表明:(i)金融发展指数和收入对环境质量有负面影响;(ii)能源消耗是 CO2 排放的关键决定因素,降低了环境质量;(iii)城市化和贸易都通过减少碳排放来提高环境质量;(iv)所选面板国家支持环境库兹涅茨曲线假说。国家层面的结果表明,由于金融发展(在四个国家)、收入水平(在五个国家)、贸易(在五个国家)和城市化(在八个国家)的增加,环境质量得到了提高。然而,由于金融发展(在六个国家)、收入水平(在八个国家)、能源消耗(在十二个国家)、贸易(在六个国家)和城市化(在五个国家)的增加,环境质量下降。环境库兹涅茨曲线假说在五个中东欧国家得到支持。此外,因果关系结果证实了收入和环境质量以及金融发展和能源消耗之间存在反馈关系。因此,我们得出结论,收入水平和金融发展是中东欧国家高二氧化碳排放的主要驱动因素。这项研究的结果为制定适当的政策提供了新的见解。