• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由经验丰富的合格外科医生指导的受训者进行腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术的可行性和安全性。

Feasibility and safety of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy performed by trainees supervised by an experienced qualified surgeon.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakano Asahi Yokohama Kanagawa, Yokohama, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):429-435. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06786-y. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-06786-y
PMID:30969360
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is becoming more commonly performed, but acquisition of its technique remains challenging. We investigated whether laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LDG) performed by trainees (TR) supervised by a technically qualified experienced surgeon (QS) is feasible and safe.

METHODS

The short-term outcomes of LDG were assessed in patients with gastric cancer between 2008 and 2018. We compared patients who underwent LDG performed by qualified experienced surgeons (QS group) with patients who underwent LDG performed by the trainees (TR group).

RESULTS

The operation time was longer in the TR group than in the QS group (median time: 270 min vs. 239 min, p < 0.001). The median duration of the postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in the QS group and 8 days in the TR group (p = 0.003). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Grade 2 or higher postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients (12.9%) in the QS group and 47 patients (11.7%) in the TR group (p = 0.763). Grade 3 or higher postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients (6.4%) in the QS group and 17 patients (4.2%) in the TR group (p = 0.357). Multivariate analysis showed that the American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status was an independent predictor of grade 2 or higher postoperative complications and that gender was an independent predictor of grade 3 or higher postoperative complications. The main operator (TR/QS) was not an independent predictor of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy performed by trainees supervised by an experienced surgeon is a feasible and safe procedure similar to that performed by experienced surgeons.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜胃切除术越来越普遍,但技术的掌握仍然具有挑战性。我们研究了由技术熟练的经验丰富的外科医生(QS)监督的受训者(TR)进行的腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LDG)是否可行和安全。

方法

评估了 2008 年至 2018 年期间接受胃癌腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LDG)的患者的短期结果。我们将接受有经验的合格外科医生(QS 组)进行 LDG 的患者与接受受训者(TR 组)进行 LDG 的患者进行比较。

结果

TR 组的手术时间长于 QS 组(中位数时间:270 分钟比 239 分钟,p < 0.001)。QS 组的术后住院时间中位数为 9 天,TR 组为 8 天(p = 0.003)。两组术后并发症发生率无显著差异。QS 组有 18 例(12.9%)和 TR 组有 47 例(11.7%)发生 2 级或以上术后并发症(p = 0.763)。QS 组有 9 例(6.4%)和 TR 组有 17 例(4.2%)发生 3 级或以上术后并发症(p = 0.357)。多因素分析显示,美国麻醉医师协会身体状况是 2 级或以上术后并发症的独立预测因素,性别是 3 级或以上术后并发症的独立预测因素。主要手术者(TR/QS)不是并发症的独立预测因素。

结论

由经验丰富的外科医生监督的受训者进行的腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术是一种可行且安全的手术,与经验丰富的外科医生进行的手术相似。

相似文献

1
Feasibility and safety of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy performed by trainees supervised by an experienced qualified surgeon.由经验丰富的合格外科医生指导的受训者进行腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术的可行性和安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):429-435. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06786-y. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
2
Accreditation as a qualified surgeon improves surgical outcomes in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.认证为合格的外科医生可改善腹腔镜远端胃切除术的手术效果。
Surg Today. 2021 Dec;51(12):1978-1984. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02309-2. Epub 2021 May 29.
3
Safety of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer when performed by trainee surgeons with little experience in performing open gastrectomy.由几乎没有开放胃切除术经验的实习外科医生进行腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术的安全性。
Surg Today. 2018 Feb;48(2):211-216. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1569-8. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
4
Three-Port Versus Five-Port Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Case-Control Study.三孔与五孔腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术治疗早期胃癌患者:一项倾向评分匹配病例对照研究
J Invest Surg. 2018 Dec;31(6):455-463. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1355941. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
5
Is sufficient experience performing open gastrectomies necessary to start laparoscopic distal gastrectomy training?是否需要有足够的开腹胃切除术经验才能开始腹腔镜远端胃切除术的培训?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jul;14(3):489-495. doi: 10.1111/ases.12901. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
6
Early experience of duet laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (duet-LDG) using three abdominal ports for gastric carcinoma: surgical technique and comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.三孔法腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术(duet-LDG)治疗胃癌的早期经验:手术技术及与传统腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3559-66. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4653-4. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
7
Effectiveness and safety of a laparoscopic training system combined with modified reconstruction techniques for total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.腹腔镜训练系统联合改良重建技术在全腹腔镜远端胃切除术中的有效性和安全性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 7;26(13):1490-1500. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i13.1490.
8
Low incidence of postoperative infectious complications following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer in older adult patients above 75 years: Propensity score-matched comparison with open distal gastrectomy.腹腔镜与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗 75 岁以上老年局部进展期胃癌术后感染并发症的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Oct;17(4):e13371. doi: 10.1111/ases.13371.
9
Short and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single-center experience (retrospective cohort study).腹腔镜全胃切除术治疗胃癌的近期和远期疗效:单中心经验(回顾性队列研究)。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:109-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.027. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
10
Feasibility and safety comparison of laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric carcinoma with D2 lymphadenectomy.腹腔镜辅助与开腹胃癌D2淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的可行性及安全性比较
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;46(4):323-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw001. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system on the oncological safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study.内镜手术技能资质体系对腹腔镜胃癌根治术肿瘤安全性的影响:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5693-5703. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11153-7. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Advantages of a robotic approach compared with laparoscopy gastrectomy for patients with high visceral fat area.与腹腔镜胃切除术相比,机器人手术在高内脏脂肪区患者中的优势。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6181-6193. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09178-x. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Educational system of laparoscopic gastrectomy for trainee-how to teach, how to learn.面向学员的腹腔镜胃切除术教学体系——如何教,如何学。
J Vis Surg. 2017 Feb 13;3:16. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2016.12.13. eCollection 2017.
2
Endoscopic surgery in Japan: The 12th national survey(2012-2013) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery.日本的内镜手术:日本内镜外科学会的第12次全国调查(2012 - 2013年)
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017 Nov;10(4):345-353. doi: 10.1111/ases.12428. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
3
Short-term outcomes in minimally invasive versus open gastrectomy: the differences between East and West. A systematic review of the literature.
Laparoscopic Gastric Resection for Gastric Cancer: Is Intracorporeal Anastomosis Necessary?
腹腔镜胃癌切除术:体内吻合是否必要?
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Sep-Oct;36(6):1177-1182. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.6.1915.
4
Effectiveness and safety of a laparoscopic training system combined with modified reconstruction techniques for total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.腹腔镜训练系统联合改良重建技术在全腹腔镜远端胃切除术中的有效性和安全性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 7;26(13):1490-1500. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i13.1490.
微创与开放胃癌手术的短期疗效比较:东西方的差异。系统文献回顾。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jan;21(1):19-30. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0747-0. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
4
Safety of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer when performed by trainee surgeons with little experience in performing open gastrectomy.由几乎没有开放胃切除术经验的实习外科医生进行腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术的安全性。
Surg Today. 2018 Feb;48(2):211-216. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1569-8. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
5
Training system for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术训练系统
Surg Today. 2017 Jul;47(7):802-809. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1439-9. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
6
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).《日本胃癌治疗指南2014(第4版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
7
Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01).与开放性远端胃癌切除术相比,腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术治疗Ⅰ期胃癌的发病率降低:一项多中心随机对照试验(KLASS-01)的短期结果
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346.
8
Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.胃癌:ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 May;40(5):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.020.
9
Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines.胃癌临床实践指南(2013 年版):NCCN 指南的重点更新内容。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 May 1;11(5):531-46. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0070.
10
A phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric Cancer (JCOG0912).腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫术治疗临床ⅠA/ⅠB 期胃癌的 III 期研究(JCOG0912)。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar;43(3):324-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys220. Epub 2012 Dec 28.